sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Platforms as Partners?: Dissecting the Interplay Between Civil Society Organizing and Social Media Platforms
University of Bologna, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4809-0207
Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4809-0207
Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Administration.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1477-2493
2025 (English)In: Social Media + Society, E-ISSN 2056-3051, Vol. 11, no 2Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A few social media platforms have come to play a central role in civil society organizing, often functioning as organizing partners. But on whose terms? As organizing partners, commercial social media platforms shape the conditions under which civil society actors organize, also shaping organizational dynamics, visibility, and collective action. Far from being neutral partners, these platforms become battlegrounds where civil society actors and platform owners negotiate power, visibility, and control?differently affecting various forms of civil society actors and organizing. Therefore, we need to move beyond the notion of platforms as mere organizing agents to critically examine the opportunities and constraints they create for different civil society actors, as well as how different civil society actors navigate these. This requires considering both exogenous, contextual elements, and endogenous, actor-centered elements of civil society organizing. Doing so allows us to examine how organizing efforts emerge not simply on social media platforms but with them, requiring constant negotiation with platform logics. The collection of articles in this special issue shows how social media platforms enable civil society organizing, but also how platform-driven asymmetries emerge and play out differently according to the different features that characterize the civil society organizations at stake.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2025. Vol. 11, no 2
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-57275DOI: 10.1177/20563051251343865ISI: 001495519400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105008181729OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-57275DiVA, id: diva2:1961159
Available from: 2025-05-26 Created: 2025-05-26 Last updated: 2025-10-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Weinryb, Noomi

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mattoni, AliceUldam, JulieWeinryb, Noomi
By organisation
Public Administration
In the same journal
Social Media + Society
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 95 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf