sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Land-sparing benefits biodiversity while land-sharing benefits ecosystem services: Stakeholders’ perspectives on biodiversity conservation strategies in boreal forests
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5864-2669
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain.
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6823-3503
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Ambio, ISSN 0044-7447, E-ISSN 1654-7209, Vol. 53, no 1, p. 20-33Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Biodiversity conservation and economic profit from forests can be combined by various land-sparing and land-sharing approaches. Using a semi-structured survey, we evaluated support for scenarios representing contrasting conservation strategies in a managed boreal forest landscape. Land-sparing approaches were supported by the conservation organisation, regional administrations and the forest company, mainly motivated by the benefit for biodiversity based on ecological theory. Land-sharing approaches were supported by one recreational organisation, some municipalities and the forest owners’ association, mainly motivated by the delivery of ecosystem services. Stakeholder groups using certain ecosystem services had motivations that we related to an anthropocentric mindset, while others focused more on species conservation, which can be related both to an anthropocentric or an ecocentric mindsets. Forest conservation planning should consider stakeholders’ preferences to handle land-use conflicts. Since reaching consensus among multiple stakeholders seems unfeasible, a combination of land-sparing and land-sharing approaches is probably the best compromise.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2024. Vol. 53, no 1, p. 20-33
National Category
Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use Ecology Forest Science
Research subject
Environmental Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52482DOI: 10.1007/s13280-023-01926-0ISI: 001087780900003PubMedID: 37819440Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85173898124OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-52482DiVA, id: diva2:1804344
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2016-00786Available from: 2023-10-12 Created: 2023-10-12 Last updated: 2023-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(644 kB)57 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 644 kBChecksum SHA-512
e97436ad5ff7e68a45fd4964a7317d2e6f76083d85ce5bd20c81fbc813efb1b6e9deaa3551b76a0ad7e2813771f631c9b4365c9d125bb47ccc455632302c6f37
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusPMC Full text

Authority records

Johansson, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Löfroth, ThereseJohansson, Johanna
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
Ambio
Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-useEcologyForest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 57 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 133 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf