sh.sePublications
4142434445464744 of 83
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Rights-Based Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Regulatory Measures in the European Union, the United States, and China
Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Law.
2026 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This study adopts a rights-focused perspective to evaluate how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is regulated in the European Union, the United States, and China through a legal analysis. It uses a three-jurisdiction framework to examine the EU AI Act, assess its implications for fundamental rights and contrast it with AI regulatory approaches in the United States and China. The analysis focuses on how these legal frameworks safeguard fundamental rights and structure accountability in the development and deployment of AI systems. Drawing on doctrinal analysis of existing regulations, legal documents, case law and academic literature, the study identifies significant differences in regulatory strategies — ranging from rights-based and risk-based models to more security driven and market driven approaches. It concludes with recommendations for regulatory convergence and policy harmonisation aimed at strengthening human rights protection, transparency and accountability in AI governance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. , p. 67
Keywords [en]
Artificial Intelligence; Regulation and Legislation of AI; AI systems; EU law; Fundamental rights; Human rights law; Privacy and Data protection; Non-Discrimination; Expression; Fairness and Explanation; Ethical AI governance; Accountability and Transparency; Sustainable Development Goals; Legal dogmatic method; European Union; United States; China.
National Category
Law Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-59104OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-59104DiVA, id: diva2:2033112
Subject / course
Public Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-01-28 Created: 2026-01-28 Last updated: 2026-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(333 kB)30 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 333 kBChecksum SHA-512
c437874bcb2d0482cb54032b790a0ac81c9cfc709ab15a8e874736b8b800942e2de67087e27ba9da50fdff79a6225278e31920d48912d917d57fbd401cfbe672
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Law
LawOther Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 334 hits
4142434445464744 of 83
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf