sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
“What?”: – The Q-drop Corpus’s Usage of Rhetorical Questions to Refer to Independent Information Retrieval
Södertörn University, School of Historical and Contemporary Studies, Archive Studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4350-6346
2025 (English)Conference paper, Poster (with or without abstract) (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The communications from the source "Q" are regarded by the QAnon movement, a political and conspiracy theory group that rose to prominence in the early months of 2021 after storming the Capitol in Washington, D.C., as their primary information source. Between November 2017 and November 2022, "Q" posted brief remarks on many message boards, including 4Chan, 8Chan, and others. The messages make predictions about future political developments and offer commentary on current political happenings (OperationQ 2025). 

The Q-drop corpus—the 4,966 posts made by the poster Q—is full of rhetorical questions with the purpose of inciting the reader to "Do your own research." Relating to earlier research, I have made a collection of all Q-drops in .txt format, which makes it possible to search through all posts using the program Grep (Grep 2025). In this poster I will map and analyse the use of rhetorical questions in the corpus; Especially such rhetorical questions that invite the reader to do their own research using a search engine. 

Purpose

“Do your own research” or DYOR has been trending in social media for a couple of years. It is often used in connection to the spread of conspiracy theories and by authors on the subject described as: “The basic idea behind DYOR is that laypeople should not follow the conclusions of experts but instead seek out information on their own to arrive at their own conclusions.” (Ballatyne et al 2022). Using a known corpus of conspiracy theory as the Q-drops to investigate the use of DYOR-inciting will put new light on the reciprocative nature of conspiracy theory. 

Method

The investigation is performed in two phases. First a mapping phase, in which the material is reviewed through a hermeneutic method and categories of injunction towards “do your own research” are created. Then an analytical phase in which a search for these different categories in the material is performed. This will form the basis of an analysis of how the Q-drops urges the followers to “Do their own research.” The research process and the results are presented in the form of a poster. 

Results

There will be two types of results. First, a variety of categories that describe the settings in which DYOR is employed are the outcomes of the mapping process. The second is the frequency of occurrence of each category in the corpus.

References

Ballantyne, N., Celniker, J., &Dunning, D. (2022). “Do Your Own Research”. Social Epistemology, 38(3), 302-317.

Grep (2025), Grep Manual Page, Retrieved January 27, 2025 from https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/grep.1.html 

OperationQ (2025). Intelligence drops. Retrieved January 27, 2025 from https://operationq.pub/ 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bamberg: University of Bamberg , 2025.
Keywords [en]
QAnon, Grep, Conspiracy theories, 4Chan, Donald Trump
National Category
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified History of Science and Ideas Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities and Arts
Research subject
Other research area
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-58181OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-58181DiVA, id: diva2:2000322
Conference
European Conference on Information Literacy, ECIL2025, 22-25 september 2025, Bamberg, Germany
Available from: 2025-09-23 Created: 2025-09-23 Last updated: 2025-10-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(239 kB)195 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 239 kBChecksum SHA-512
7a4436cba2c8b6db3e3f65c82a0324d8885c3dfd27d5d60224fa39b664652a75e9b84414765a7328cce2cf750f0fec6e21e073b5be5db047e16344f79f7474f6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Friberg von Sydow, Rikard

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Friberg von Sydow, Rikard
By organisation
Archive Studies
Other Humanities not elsewhere specifiedHistory of Science and IdeasInterdisciplinary Studies in Humanities and Arts

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 195 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 5394 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf