sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of genetic variants linked to liver fat and liver volume on MRI-mapped body composition
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science. Uppsala University, Sweden; Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1914-5248
University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7147-9421
Uppsala University, Sweden; Antaros Medical AB, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: JHEP Reports, E-ISSN 2589-5559, Vol. 7, no 9, article id 101468Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background & aims: A quarter of the world population is estimated to have metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Here, we aim to understand the impact of liver trait-associated genetic variants on fat content and tissue volume across organs and body compartments and on a large set of biomarkers.

Methods: Genome-wide association analyses were performed on liver fat and liver volume estimated with magnetic resonance imaging in up to 27,243 unrelated European participants from the UK Biobank. Identified variants were assessed for associations with fat fraction and tissue volume in >2 million 'Imiomics' image elements in 22,261 individuals and with circulating biomarkers in 310,224 individuals.

Results: We confirmed four liver fat and nine liver volume previously reported genetic variants (p values <5 × 10-8). We further found evidence suggestive of a novel liver volume locus, ADH4, where each additional T allele increased liver volume by 0.05 SD (SE = 0.01, p value = 3.3 × 10-8). The Imiomics analyses showed that liver fat-increasing variants were specifically associated with fat fraction of the liver tissue (p values <2.8 × 10-3) and with higher inflammation, liver and renal injury biomarkers, and lower lipid levels. Associations of liver volume variants with fat content, tissue volume, and biomarkers were more heterogeneous, for example the liver volume-increasing alleles at CENPW and PPP1R3B were associated with higher skeletal muscle volumes and were more pronounced in men, whereas the GCKR variant was negatively associated with lower skeletal muscle volumes in women (p values <2.8 × 10-3).

Conclusions: Liver fat-increasing variants were mostly linked to fat fraction of the liver and were positively associated with some adverse metabolic biomarkers and negatively with lipids. In contrast, liver volume-associated variants showed a less consistent pattern across organs and biomarkers.

Impact and implications: Liver fat and liver volume are common metabolic traits with a strong genetic component, yet the extent to which they exert organ-specific vs. systemic effects remains poorly defined. By integrating genome-wide association analyses and high-resolution neck-to-knee magnetic resonance imaging data through the Imiomics framework, this study reveals distinct genetic architectures for liver fat and liver volume, including sex-specific effects. These findings provide new insights into the biological, organ-level, tissue-specific, and systemic characteristics of steatotic liver disease and its genetic determinants. The results may inform the development of precision imaging genetic approaches, biomarker discovery, and stratified risk assessment strategies, while reinforcing the importance of incorporating sex-specific analyses in future research and clinical applications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 7, no 9, article id 101468
National Category
Nutrition and Dietetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-57943DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101468ISI: 001550849600005PubMedID: 40823175Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105012556580OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-57943DiVA, id: diva2:1991029
Available from: 2025-08-21 Created: 2025-08-21 Last updated: 2025-10-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusPMC Full text

Authority records

Ahmad, Shafqat

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ahmad, ShafqatCarrasquilla, Germán D.Ahmad, NoumanSayols-Baixeras, SergiDekkers, Koen F.Kennedy, BeatriceRomero-Lado, María J.Censin, Jenny C.Nguyen, DiemMartínez Mora, AndrésKilpeläinen, Tuomas O.Lind, LarsStrand, RobinFall, Tove
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
JHEP Reports
Nutrition and Dietetics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf