sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
"Som erfarenhetsforskare, då är man med och bestämmer i forskningsprojektet": en autoetnografisk studie om en gemensam forskningsprocess
Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Social Work. Karolinska Institutet, Sverige.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6333-2852
Karolinska Institutet, Sverige.
Karolinska Institutet, Sverige.
Karolinska Institutet, Sverige.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (Swedish)In: Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, ISSN 1104-1420, E-ISSN 2003-5624, Vol. 29, no 3-4, p. 305-324Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In a participatory action research project, we emphasize experiences of collaboration between aca-demic and community researchers by applying analytical autoethnography. The aim of the article is to describe the research process which involves both individual and collaborative processes, and to analyze challenges in relation to participation in the ongoing research process. We identified four themes: Start-up and initial challenges, Conditions and structural prerequisites for collabo-ration, Joint development of work methods and Power and role distribution. Our findings are presented in two separate analyses; a collaborative inductive analysis and an academic led theore-tical analysis in which Arnstein’s ladder of participation and Fricker’s concept of epistemic injus-tice are utilized in order to scrutinize challenges related to different degrees of participation in the research process. The results demonstrate that shared hermeneutic resources are necessary for the mitigation of epistemic injustice and enablement of mutual learning processes, such as collective writing processes. The results also indicate that a full participation for community researchers in the entire research process was difficult to achieve, both in relation to structural resources such as allocated time, and in relation to perceptions of meaning- making aspects, for example, indivi-dual interests and contributionsin terms of knowledge.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping University Electronic Press, 2023. Vol. 29, no 3-4, p. 305-324
Keywords [en]
Participatory research, participatory design, co-creative processes, implementation, epistemic injustice
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52537DOI: 10.3384/svt.2022.29.3-4.4673OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-52537DiVA, id: diva2:1807083
Available from: 2023-10-24 Created: 2023-10-24 Last updated: 2023-10-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Hultman, Lill

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hultman, Lill
By organisation
Social Work
In the same journal
Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf