The last decades the public sector has been looking for ways of developing citizen-centric approaches, and design has been proven effective, bridging the logics of public policies, services, and the citizens’ needs by providing a user centric perspective (Sangiorgi, 2015; Pirinen et al., 2022). However, design has mainly been employed by consultants in policy experiments, e-services, living labs or innovation hubs (Gascó, 2017) and numerous failures related to servitization and participation demonstrate the inherent complexity of such initiatives (Anthopoulos et al., 2016). We argue that the public sector needs to embrace user-centricity to provide relevant services and opportunities for participation, problem-solving, and co-creation and that this requires integrating design competence and to learn how to apply design methods in the everyday work of civil servants. Therefore, we ask; How can design methods be introduced into the daily work of civil servants to promote a citizen-centred approach?

To understand and analyse the perception of design methods and tools we organised a four-hour introduction to design in a municipality. We then conducted semi-structured interviews (N=25) with the participants. This way we could investigate the initial perceptions of civil servants, towards using design methods in their daily work. We discuss their initial ideas of what they see as enablers and challenges and the application, enforcement, and prerequisites for the use of design methods in creating a citizen-centred organization.

The conceptual foundation for the research is based on previous knowledge on design and organisation change, such as design-led initiatives in the public sector (Hermus et al., 2020; Sangiorgi, 2015; Pirinen et al., 2022), and initiatives focusing on service- and policy design (Kimbell et al., 2022; Pirinen et al., 2022). Drawing on the data and previous research the study provides insights on first impression when introducing civil servants to design methods related to their daily work and report findings of enablers, challenges, application and enforcement and prerequisites needed to create a user-centred organization. Thus, contributing to the field and providing pathways for future studies on design methods in the public sector and practical guidance for establishing user-centric organizations.

References

Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C.G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare. gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161-173.

Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90-98.

Hermus, M., van Buuren, A., & Bekkers, V. (2020). Applying design in public administration: a literature review to explore the state of the art. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 21–48.

Kimbell, L., Richardson, L., Mazé, R., & Durose, C. (2022). Design for public policy: Embracing uncertainty and hybridity in mapping future research. In D. Lockton, et al., (Eds.), Proceedings of Design Research Society.

Pirinen, A., Savolainen, K., Hyysalo, S., & Mattelmäki, T. (2022). Design enters the city: Requisites and points of friction in deepening public sector design. Int. Journal of Design, 16(3), 1-19.

Sangiorgi, D. (2015). Designing for public sector innovation in the UK: design strategies for paradigm shifts. Foresight, 17(4), 332–348.

Design is never neutral, as it reflects and reinforces societal norms, values, and power structures. As the design field faces growing concerns about relevance and responsibility, norm-critical and participatory approaches offer ways to challenge dominant assumptions. Norms in design shape who gets to design, what is considered good design, and who benefits. By making these norms visible, norm-critical design questions exclusionary practices and provides alternative perspectives. Participatory design has long emphasized co-creation with marginalized groups, redistributing design agency, and ensuring that design is done with users, not just for them. In today’s rapidly shifting landscape, marked by technological change, economic uncertainty, and political tensions, such approaches become even more crucial. Without intentional inclusion, the design practice risks reinforcing dominant perspectives and excluding diverse voices. This contribution argues that norm-critical participatory design offers a path toward more just and inclusive design practices. By addressing implicit biases and engaging underrepresented groups, designers can create solutions that do not merely accommodate diversity but actively challenge exclusionary norms. In shaping the future of design, embracing these perspectives is not just an ethical choice—it is a necessity.

This study explores the role of young people in urban planning through the lens of procedural justice, focusing on their engagement and participation in research seeking to further youth use and perception of public space. Conducted in Huddinge Municipality, Sweden, the research involved youth as co-researchers in participatory mapping exercises to document their spatial preferences and experiences. Findings highlight the importance of inclusive urban planning that recognizes young people as legitimate stakeholders. Liked spaces were often those that supported social interaction, physical activity, and autonomy, while disliked spaces in the municipality were those the young respondents associate with fear and feelings of discomfort. This study casts a perspective on the need for planning practices that accommodate diverse youth perspectives and promote equitable access to public spaces. Despite challenges in institutional uptake, the research demonstrates the potential of youth participatory methods to inform our understanding and practice for advancing towards more just and responsive urban governance. This work contributes to ongoing debates on spatial justice and the inclusion of marginalized groups in urban decision-making.

This paper explores the preferences and experiences of young residents in Huddinge Municipality, Sweden, regarding public spaces and meeting places. Using qualitative data from participatory mapping, the study reveals the importance of accessible green spaces, socialization opportunities, and safety perceptions in shaping youth engagement with public spaces. Areas perceived as unsafe or lacking youth-oriented amenities are not used and avoided. The findings suggest that integrating youth perspectives can inform more inclusive spatial planning practices, enhancing social connection, well-being, and active citizenship. This study contributes to debates on participatory planning and youth engagement in urban environments.

Internet and increased datafication, signify a new era for civic society. Social media, fundraising tools, digital petitions, social media analytics, greatly facilitate the ability to activate, organize and raise public opinion. At the same time, the technology entails algorithmic surveillance and risks of being exposed to threats and hatred. For people at risk, undocumented refugees or people with protected identity, the lack of digital infrastructures also means great difficulties. While research points to these opportunities and risks, there is lack of research on how civic society deals with the increased datafication, and what methods, tools, and strategies are used on the field. The purpose of this workshop is therefore to gather researchers who investigate the impact of digitalization on civil society, both for established NGOs and informal activism.

Drawing on a case study of media technology, this article addresses theory–practice conflict in an educational work setting. This conflict is expressed in employment contracts and career opportunities and in how professional identity is made. We demonstrate how ideas about practical and theoretical knowledge are negotiated in the academic career system, as well as made on different organisational levels and at intersections with multiple factors such as gender and precarious work conditions. The study is based on a collective memory-work and content analysis of policy documents and communication material. Our results highlight a dissonance between symbolic discourse about practice-based education, as highlighted in external communications, and the academic career system in which theoretical knowledge is more highly valued, as demonstrated in teachers’ positions and assignments.