With a population of nearly 280 million people, Indonesia is the fourth most populous nation in the world, encompassing more than 1,300 ethnic groups as well over 700 regional languages, with Bahasa Indonesia being the national language. Amid this diversity, the state promotes Pancasila (‘the Five Principles’), as the official ideological foundation of the nation. While Pancasila is constitutionally enshrined and widely invoked as a unifying framework, its meanings have been historically contested. Nonetheless, it has been foundational in teaching citizenship education, and it is clearly present in Indonesia’s shift to the digitalisation of education in recent years.
This research aims to explore the ways in which Pancasila is articulated, both historically as well as in contemporary governmental policies, and how it is adapted in teachers’ educational practices with digital media and technologies. As there is a historical lens through which one must observe the meaning-making of Pancasila, this research begins by examining this perspective from The Birth of Pancasila speech, the Pancasila Ideology Development Agency (BPIP), as well as the Merdeka Mengajar (Emancipated Teaching) digital platform (PMM) and the Pancasila Student Profile framework, which are initiatives that were launched by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology.
Through an inquiry adopting a cultural approach to educational media production, this study is theoretically grounded within the encoding/decoding framework (Hall,1973). As an analytical tool, it observes the meaning-making of Pancasila through culture and ideology (Anderson, 2006; Geertz, 1973) as well as the measurements of learning (Biesta, 2009), technological solutionism (Facer & Selwyn, 2021), and cultural citizenship identity (Dahlgren, 2006). Correspondingly, the research design centres a qualitative methodology that includes analysis of interviews, field notes observations, as well as documents and Pancasila education video analyses.
At the intersection of education technology and ideology, teachers are positioned as intermediaries to instil a culture of learning Pancasila as a ‘lived ideology’ by being its active interpreters. Ultimately, teachers’ negotiated practices in using digital technologies and media not only are a reflection of their being exemplary teachers, but also a feature of becoming Indonesian as well.