sh.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 26 of 26
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the 'Create feeds' function.
  • 1.
    August, Fredriksson
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Papajannou, Ninve
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Abstrakt normkontroll som garant för den konstitutionella överhögheten: En komparativrättslig studie mellan Sverige och Frankrike.2017Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
    Abstract [en]

    Judicial preview acts as a tool to assure that no laws to be enacted conflicts with the constitution. For that reason, it is of importance that the authorities set to perform the judicial preview are independent towards the ruling power. The aim of this essay is to do a comparison between how judicial preview is done by the Council on Legislation in Sweden and by the Constitutional Council in France. The essay examines how this preview acts as a tool to guarantee the supremacy of the constitution and to insure a none confrontational legal system. This is done with the help of the method of comparative law and the legal dogmatic method. The result of the analysis shows that judicial preview plays an increasingly important role of guaranteeing the supremacy of constitutions in legal systems of increased complexity and in societies that are experiencing political tensions. The result also shows that the constitutions in both Sweden and France is increasing in importance to protect the ways of government, democracy and basic rights for the citizens. Based on the analysis the forms of judicial preview should be reviewed and stronger safeguards for the constitution may be of interest in the future.

  • 2.
    Blanc-Gonnet Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Administrative Sanctions - Country analysis  - Sweden2013In: Administrative Sanctions in the European Union / [ed] Jansen, Oswald, Cambridge: Intersentia, 2013, 553-583 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This book offers a unique overview of the main legal systems of administrative sanctions with thorough analyses of the administrative law sanctioning systems in 13 Member States and the European Union. The focus is on both remedial and  deterrent sanctions in administrative law. Especially where deterrent sanctions are involved, the aspects of national and international constitutional law are analysed as well as the influences of criminal law approaches in this legal area. After a general analysis of the definitions of sanction, thorough country analyses are presented of Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. The book concludes with an analysis of administrative sanctions in EU Law

  • 3.
    Blanc-Gonnet Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Démocratie, transparences et État de droit: La transparence dans tous ses états2015In: Revue européenne de droit public = European Review of Public Law, ISSN 1105-1590, Vol. 27, no 1Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    An effective, inclusive democracy requires maximal transparency of ‘public information’ while, on the contrary, limiting transparency of ‘personal information’ to the minimum. However, these two transparencies have an intricate relationship: they may be independent of each other, complementary to each other, or antinomical. Additionally, the development of an information society that leads to the fusion of the  private and public spheres, the cross-utilization by the public and private sectors of their respective data, and to an increase in the dangers common to both sectors, further complicates the picture. In weakening individuals as human beings and citizens, the digital era generates threats for democracy and the Rule of Law. There is, therefore, a need for an adequate protective framework and for the main legal protagonists to face the new informational and societal challenges. The obligation to preserve underlying, foundational democratic values lies also with the business sector and with citizens themselves.

  • 4.
    Blanc-Gonnet Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Les fondements de la responsabilité de la puissance publique en droit suédois2017In: La responsabilité de la puissance publique en droit comparé: matinée d'étude du 8 juin 2016 / [ed] Aurelien Antoine & Terry Olson, Paris: Société de Législation comparée, 2017, 117-146 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Blanc-Gonnet Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Les procédures d’urgence en Suède2015In: Les procédures d'urgence devant les juges de l'administration, Étude comparative: Étude comparative, Paris: Société de Législation comparée, 2015Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Blanc-Gonnet Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Traité de droit administratif - en anmälan2014In: Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, ISSN 0015-8585, no 2, 239-241 p.Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Blanc-Gonnet Jonason, Patricia
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Calland, Richard
    University of Cape Town.
    Global Climate Finance, Accountable Public Policy: Addressing the Multi-Dimensional Transparency Challenge2013In: The Georgetown Public Policy Review, ISSN 1083-7523, Vol. 18, no 2, 1-16 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    A concrete result of the 2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Durban (COP17) was the establishment of the Green Climate Fund (GCF), with the aim of channelling $100 billion per year from developed countries to developing countries to support their efforts to respond to climate change and promote sustainable development. The emerging global architecture for climate finance raises significant questions related to public policy and environmental governance. Participatory governance practices, including freedom of information, are increasingly considered effective tools for both coping with environmental problems and finding sustainable solutions to development challenges. Moreover, without sufficient transparency in their decision making, the various climate funds are unlikely to attract a sufficient supply of urgently needed finance, and the ambitious targets of the GCF will be unmet. Yet, the question of the modality and process for governing climate finance is undetermined and obscure. The complexity of climate finance stems from a multi-level structure with international, regional, national, and sub-national actors; multi-sector dimensions, with both public and private donors and recipients; and the sector’s global/multilateral/multidirectional character. This article amplifies the “transparency pressure points” in climate finance generally and the GCF specifically. Public policymaking, in response to the many complex and urgent climate change challenges, may depend on securing the principle of freedom of information within the global climate finance architecture.

  • 8.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Administration et collecte de données personnelles sur Internet et les réseaux sociaux : à la recherche  d'un cadre juridique adéquat2017In: Revue internationale des gouvernements ouverts, ISSN 2553-6869, no 5, 13-32 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 9.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Caractères essentiels du droit suédois de la procédure administrative2016In: Droit comparé de la procédure administrative / Comparative Law of Administrative Procedure / [ed] Jean-Bernard Auby, Brussels: Bruylant, 2016, 179-190 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 10.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Conditions for Participatory Environmental Governance in the Baltic Sea Region: At the intersection of Regionalisation and Europeanisation2015Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Démocratie et État de droit dans le cinéma suédois2016In: CinémAction, ISSN 0243-4504, no 158, 88-95 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    La solidarité financière en Suède2014Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Le droit d’accès à l’Information en droit suédois : une épopée de 250 ans2016In: Revue Internationale de droit des données et du numérique, ISSN 2553-6893, Vol. 2, 37-50 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 14.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Le droit à l'oubli numérique en Suède2017Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Right to be Forgotten in Sweden 

    Google has received about 15,000 requests for delisting regarding Swedish websites. Yet, in more than half of the cases the American search engine operator refused to remove the disputed websites from their results.

    What kind of help may individuals to whom a request for delisting has been denied expect from public authorities expect from public authorities? In other words, how do the Swedish authorities apply the Google ruling? These are the questions we tackle in this paper, first by focusing on the manner in which the Data Protection Authority, the Datainspektion (DI), deals with the issue; then by looking on how the courts – in the current case, the ordinary judge – handle complaints against search engine operators’ decisions not to delist incriminated URLs.

    The first section, dedicated to the theme of the right to be delisted and the data protection authority, begins with a brief review of the information provided by the Data Protection Authority’s website on the right to be forgotten and the manner to exercise it. We notice that there is a need for clearer information but that some improvements seem to be underway, not least concerning the right to erasure laid down in the General Data Protection Regulation.

    The next two parts of Section 1 deal with the twofold procedure initiated in May 2015 by the DI towards Google, following complaints submitted to the Swedish authority. One part of the procedure concerns thirteen individual complaints selected by the DI that the Swedish supervisory authority required Google to review. The second part of the procedure consists of a general investigation of the way the American search engine operator complies with the European case law on the right to be forgotten. In a decision closing these two procedures on May 2nd 2017, the Data Protection Authority, assesses that in five of these cases Google’s reiterated refusal to delist websites from the search results were in breach of the Swedish data protection legislation and requires Google to delist the incriminated websites by August 2nd 2017. Moreover, the Swedish Data Protection Authority makes two recommendations to Google with regard to the procedure its removals-team follows when receiving a request from an individual to remove links. Additionally the DI requires Google to apply the right to be forgotten not only for search results on Google’s Swedish pages, but also on Google’s search engine for other countries that ”have such a relationship to Sweden and to the data subject that they cause an infringement in the privacy of the data subject”. The American search engine operator has three weeks from the date of reception of the decision for lodging an appeal to the administrative court.

    The second section, entitled The right to be delisted and the ordinary judge, provides an analysis of the first Swedish judgment in the field. The court of first instance of Stockholm, in its decision from May 9th 2016, made upon the appeal of a businessman in the construction sector complaining about the refusal of Google to remove links to webpages publishing critical articles regarding the plaintiff, decided in favor of the search engine operator. We analyse this judgement with a particular focus, first, on the balancing of the interests the judge makes in the present case, as well as on the legality of the data processing, and, second, on the question raised by the defendant on the competence of the ordinary judge to prohibit the continued processing of data. On the first issue, the Swedish authority, taking inter alia into account the role of public figure of the plaintiff and the seriousness of the news outlets which published the incriminated articles, concluded that the interests of Google and third persons to diffuse and access information contained in the articles outweight the right to protection of privacy and the right of data protection of the plaintiff. Consequently, the judge assessed that the data processing wasn’t illegal. On the second issue of the competence of the ordinary judge to order the cessation of the listing of websites, we first review the different opinions on that issue before raising the question of the compliance of the Swedish legal framework in terms of the effectiveness of the application of the European ruling on the right to be delisted.

    Our general conclusion is that it is too early to give a straightforward appreciation on the way the Swedish authorities apply the right to be forgotten. Indeed, we don’t know how the legally robust decision taken by the DI in May 2017 will impact its policy in the field of the right to be forgotten; will the DI, for instance, endorse more individuals’ complaints? Furthermore, to this date, there has been no decision on the right to be forgotten by the administrative court and only one by an ordinary court. In any case, the absence of obligation for the Datainspektion to forward individual complaints to search engine operators, if combined with a lack of power for the ordinary judge to order a delisting, would raise questions on the effectivness in Sweden of the application of the right to be forgotten.

     

     

  • 15.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Le système de la péréquation entre les collectivités locales en Suède2015In: Revue Francaise d'Administration Publique, ISSN 0152-7401, E-ISSN 1965-0620, Vol. 4, no 156, 1021-1026 p.Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [fr]

    Pour faire face aux disparités territoriales qui affectent les capacités financières des communes, la Suède a mis en place un système de péréquation qui comporte cinq volets : les deux principaux sont la péréquation des revenus et la péréquation des coûts. S’y ajoutent la dotation de structures, la dotation pour coûts d’entrée ainsi qu’un compte de régularisation. Chacune de ces composantes est divisée entre un système dédié aux communes et un système dédié aux comtés. Ce système permet de concilier une large autonomie locale et l’égal accès de tous les citoyens au même niveau de service.

  • 16.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Le traitement de l'inertie administrative en droit suédois2016In: Droit comparé de la procédure administrative / Comparative Law of Administrative Procedure / [ed] Jean-Bernard Auby, Brussels: Bruylant, 2016, 727-734 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 17.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Les débats sur la réforme de la procédure administrative en Suède2016In: Droit comparé de la procédure administrative / Comparative Law of Administrative Procedure / [ed] Jean-Bernard Auby, Brussels: Bruylant, 2016, 937-946 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 18.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    L’Ombudsman suédois, un protecteur des droits fondamentaux qui se découvre2017In: Revue Droit et Societe, ISSN 0769-3362Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 19.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Multidimensional Governance illustrated by Participatory Environmental Governance - The Baltic Sea Region example2015In: Multilevel Governance – from local communities to a true European community: Proceedings of the Conference on European Democracy 2014 (EuDEM 2014) 5 and 6 May 2014 (Strasbourg) / [ed] Alexander Balthasar, Johannes W. Pichler (eds), Wien: Klein Publishing , 2015Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    The International Environmental Participatory Governance Legal Framework2013In: On conference website, 2013Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 21.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    The Protection of Privacy in the Context of Video Surveillance: Towards a European Model?2013In: Video Surveillance and Social Control in a Comparative Perspective / [ed] Björklund, Fredrika; Svenonius, Ola, New York: Routledge, 2013, 97-128 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This edited collection reports the results of a comparative study of video surveillance/CCTV in Germany, Poland, and Sweden. It investigates how video surveillance as technologically mediated social control is affected by national characteristics, with a specific concern for recent political history. The book is motivated by asking what makes video surveillance "tick" in three very different cultural settings, two of which (Poland and Sweden) are virtually unexplored in the literature on surveillance. The selection of countries is motivated by an interest in societies with recent experiences of authoritarianism, and how they respond to the global trend towards intensified technical means of control. With thorough empirical studies, the book constitutes an important contribution to security studies, surveillance studies, and post-communist area studies.

  • 22.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    The Swedish legal framework on the right of access to official documents2017In: The Right of Access to Public Information: An International Comparative Legal Survey / [ed] Hermann-Josef Blanke ; Ricardo Perlingeiro, Heidelberg: Springer, 2017Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    The transposition of the PSI Directive into the Swedish legal system2014In: Public Sector Information - Open Data: What is fair : Free Access or Fees? / [ed] Balthasar, Alexander and Sully, Melanie, Wien: Facultas , 2014, 53-63 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Transparency as a mean for the realization of Human rights2014Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 25.
    Jonason, Patricia
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    Öppna lärresurser som komplement till traditionella läromedel och undervisningsformer: exempel tagna från utbildningen i offentlig rätt2014Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 26.
    Trybus, Martin
    et al.
    University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
    Caranta, RobertoUniversity of Turin, Italy.Edelstam, GunillaSödertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Public Law.
    EU public contract law: public procurement and beyond2014Collection (editor) (Other academic)
1 - 26 of 26
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf