sh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Avgränsa sökresultatet
12 1 - 50 av 81
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Träffar per sida
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Författare A-Ö
  • Författare Ö-A
  • Titel A-Ö
  • Titel Ö-A
  • Publikationstyp A-Ö
  • Publikationstyp Ö-A
  • Äldst först
  • Nyast först
  • Skapad (Äldst först)
  • Skapad (Nyast först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Äldst först)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyast först)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidigaste först)
  • Disputationsdatum (senaste först)
Markera
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Andersson, Staffan
    et al.
    Växjö University, Sweden.
    Aylott, Nicholas
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Södertörns högskola, Centrum för Östersjö- och Östeuropaforskning (CBEES). Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Centrum för studier av politikens organisering.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Democracy and technocracy in Sweden's Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic2022Ingår i: Frontiers in Political Science, E-ISSN 2673-3145, Vol. 4, s. 1-13, artikel-id 832518Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    Sweden’s management of the coronavirus pandemic, beginning in early 2020, hasbeen much discussed because it deviated from other countries’ equivalents. Set inthe context of scholarly debate about the balance between politicians and experts inpolitical decision-making, we argue that a necessary condition for this case of Swedishexceptionalism was the manner of policy-making adopted by the Swedish authorities. Inthis article, we describe this policy-making procedure, which involved a radical form ofdelegation by elected politicians to appointed experts, and seek to explain how it cameabout. We focus on the 1st year of the pandemic, and use media reports and other publicdocuments, including parts of a public inquiry, as our empirical material.

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    Democracy and Technocracy Covid-19
  • 2.
    Bendrath, Ralf
    et al.
    University of Bremen, Germany.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Università di Bologna, Italy.
    From Cyberterrorism to Cyberwar, Back and Forth: How the United States Securitized Cyberspace2007Ingår i: International relations and security in the digital age / [ed] Johan Eriksson and Giampiero Giacomello, London: Routledge, 2007, s. 57-82Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 3. Bröms, Peter
    et al.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Svensson, Bo
    Reconstructing Survival: Evolving Perspectives on Euro-Arctic Politics1994Bok (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 4.
    Demirel, Cagla
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Competitive victimhood and reconciliation: the case of Turkish–Armenian relations2020Ingår i: Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, ISSN 1070-289X, E-ISSN 1547-3384, Vol. 27, nr 5, s. 537-556Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper argues that conflicts tend to be intractable if collective victimhood has become a component of national identity, and when conflicting communities claim to be the ‘real’ or ‘only’ victims, and that their suffering justifies crimes past and present. Turkish and Armenian narratives of competitive victimhood are analysed drawing on public opinion polls from Turkey and Armenia, and personal interviews with Turks and Armenians. The study corroborates past theory and research that competitive victimhood prevents reconciliation, particularly if it has become an essential part of national identity. The paper also shows that Turkish–Armenian relations remain at the bottom stage of the reconciliation ladder. Yet, some of our empirical observations suggest that when grass-roots level interaction between Turks and Armenians is facilitated (which has been prevented not least because of the closed border), there is room for the abandonment of competitive victimhood at least on an interpersonal level, if not on a general societal or political level. 

  • 5.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Agendas, threats and politics: securitization in Sweden2000Rapport (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 6.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Cyberplagues, IT, and Security: Threat Politics in the Information Age.2001Ingår i: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, ISSN 0966-0879, E-ISSN 1468-5973, Vol. 9, nr 4, s. 211-222Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The swiftness and considerable political impact of the widespread conceptualisation of IT as a security problem makes it a particularly fruitful case for analysing threat politics – how and why some threat images but not others end up on the political agenda. A conceptual framework combining theories of framing, securitisation, agenda setting and policy diffusion is developed, which is applied to the case of IT security policy in Sweden. The analysis emphasises the impact of the end of the Cold War, the uncertainty following the breakthrough of the information age, the tradition of focusing on information and technological development in military affairs, the adaptability to ‘widened security thinking’ within the military-bureaucratic establishment, and the lack of opposition to the securitisation of IT.

  • 7.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Debating the Politics of Security Studies: Response to Goldmann, Wæver and Williams1999Ingår i: Cooperation and Conflict, ISSN 0010-8367, E-ISSN 1460-3691, Vol. 34, nr 3, s. 345-352Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
  • 8.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Den nya rymdkapplöpningen: Diktaturer och entreprenörer på frammarsch2023Ingår i: Ikaros - Tidskrift om människan och vetenskapen, ISSN 1796-1998, Vol. 9, nr 2, s. 36-40Artikel i tidskrift (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 9.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Drömmen om en egen stat2001Ingår i: Internationella Studier, ISSN 0020-952X, nr 1, s. 59-70Artikel i tidskrift (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 10.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Explaining Security Agenda Setting: Beyond the Domestic Realm2002Ingår i: Cooperation or competition?: a juxtaposition of research problems regarding security in the Baltic Sea Region / [ed] Olav F Knudsen, Huddinge: Södertörns högskola , 2002, s. 81-92Konferensbidrag (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    Explaining Security Agenda Setting: Beyond the Domestic Realm
  • 11.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Forskarrollen - att bli publicerad, befordrad och få anslag2016Ingår i: Att forska: Praktiker och roller / [ed] Linus Hagström, Niklas Bremberg och Arita Holmberg, Carlsson Bokförlag, 2016, s. 183-205Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
  • 12.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Frontier politics: The realm of dreamers2015Ingår i: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479, Vol. 1, nr 4-5, s. 365-367Artikel i tidskrift (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 13.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Hotbildernas politik2001Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 14.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Hur och när påverkar forskning utrikespolitik?2007Ingår i: Internationella Studier, ISSN 0020-952X, nr 1, s. 64-76Artikel i tidskrift (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 15.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Introduction2001Ingår i: Threat politics: new perspectives on security, risk and crisis management / [ed] Johan Eriksson, Aldershot: Ashgate , 2001, s. 1-18Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 16.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Statsvetenskap.
    Kampen om hotbilden: rutin och drama i svensk säkerhetspolitik2004Bok (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 17.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för statsvetenskap, nationalekonomi och juridik, Statsvetenskap.
    Konstruktivism2006Ingår i: Internationella relationer / [ed] Jakob Gustavsson & Jonas Tallberg, Lund: Studentlitteratur , 2006, 1, s. 87-102Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 18.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Utrikespolitiska institutet, Sverige.
    Konstruktivism2021Ingår i: Internationella relationer / [ed] Jakob Gustavsson; Jonas Tallberg, Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 2021, 4, s. 131-138Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 19.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Machiavelli and Critical Security Studies?2000Ingår i: Cooperation and Conflict, ISSN 0010-8367, E-ISSN 1460-3691, Vol. 35, s. 107-108Artikel i tidskrift (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 20.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Myten om hemlandets säkerhet2003Ingår i: Internationella studier, ISSN 0020-952X, nr 2, s. 3-9Artikel i tidskrift (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 21.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Nationell nyhetskultur i globaliseringens tidevarv2006Ingår i: Internationella studier, ISSN 0020-952X, nr 4, s. 80-83Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 22.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Observers or Advocates?: On the Political Role of Security Analysts1999Ingår i: Cooperation and Conflict, ISSN 0010-8367, E-ISSN 1460-3691, Vol. 34, nr 3, s. 311-330Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
  • 23.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    On the Policy Relevance of Grand Theory2014Ingår i: International Studies Perspectives, ISSN 1528-3577, E-ISSN 1528-3585, Vol. 15, nr 1, s. 94-108Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper challenges the commonly held perception that grand theory is irrelevant for policy. Policy, it is often argued, is in need of detailed case-oriented empirical analysis and instrumental policy recommendations rather than any sweeping generalizations or lofty ideas emanating from grand theory. Notwithstanding, this paper argues that grand theory has an underestimated relevance for policy. To be able to see and appreciate this, the notion of policy relevance must be expanded. Whereas grand theory and grand concepts such as Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism, or Marxism do not provide case-specific knowledge or recommendations, they provide general roadmaps, conceptualization of world affairs, and also have a symbolic function, legitimating or challenging established policy paradigms. Policymakers, akin to grand theorists, arguably like to make sweeping statements and generalizations. Drawing on theory and findings in public policy studies, here applied to international relations and foreign policy, this paper suggests conditions under which grand theory can be relevant for policy.

  • 24. Eriksson, Johan
    Partition and Redemption: A Machiavellian Analysis of Sami and Basque Patriotism1997Doktorsavhandling, monografi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    Since the end of the Second World War, the location of most inter­state borders has been fixed. This suggests that the common phenomenon of ethnic groups partitioned by internationally recognized state borders is permanent. Nevertheless, a recurrent dream of ‘redemption’ (i.e. the building of a self-ruling polity which unifies the separate segments) is capable of inciting patri­otic mobilization even in the face of a very long period of unbroken partition. Little is known about this clash between dream and reality. How can an ethnoterritorial group which is appar­ently permanently partitioned between separate, sovereign states be redeemed? In seeking a solution to this puzzle, I attempt a Machiavellian type of analysis, defined as an approach which com­bines a patriotic perspective with a strategic view of the choice of specific means and ends in a way which is free of state-centrism. I also employ Machiavelli’s theory-building method, which is a form of abduction.

    This study focuses on six aspects of the problem of partition and redemption: the territorial setting, the historical process, partitioning state contexts, perceptions of partition and homeland mythology, strategies, and outcomes. Two instances are selected for case study and compari­son: the Sami in northernmost Europe, and the Basques in Spain and France. Both groups are partitioned between separate states, are a minority in each one, and lack control over all existing state governments.

    The analysis reveals the unexpected result that the less numerous, greater dispersed, more partitioned, and gen­erally weaker Sami have been more successful in redemption than have the Basques. While the Sami have built common bodies which officially represent Sami in all four partitioning states, the Basques have only a limited transborder cooperation between the Basque Autonomous Community (BAC) in Spain and non-Basque regional authorities in France. It is more impor­tant to have com­patible building blocks in each state (like the three Nordic Sami Parliaments), than to have a single powerful one (like the BAC). Without fairly similar and harmonized parti­tioning states, like the Nordic countries, it is ex­tremely difficult for transborder polity-building to succeed. Another main conclu­sion, which disputes the findings of other re­search, is that redemption is possi­ble even when a group remains partitioned, given that the goal of statehood is abandoned in favour of a less ambitious transborder homerule. In order to realize this goal, the most generally applicable method is a stepwise strategy aimed at creating compatible building blocks in each state. A variant of this is the blueprint strategy, that is, using an achievement in one state as a model for the struggle in other states. In contrast to non­parti­tioned groups, partitioned groups can refer to their own achievement in other states.

    The subject of interest here transcends the domestic-international divide. Similarly, the analysis tran­scends academic boundaries, mainly those of political theory, inter­national politics and com­parative politics. This combination provides a starting-point for further inquiry into the pattern of overlapping polities which is emerging, and of partition and redemption in particular.

  • 25.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Peter Håkansson's United Nations Reformed2012Ingår i: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 114, nr 1, s. 166-171Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 26.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Political Territories in a Global Era2011Ingår i: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 12, nr 1, s. 37-43Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
  • 27.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Institute of International Affairs.
    Power Disparity in the Digital Age2007Ingår i: Security strategies, power disparity and identity: the Baltic Sea region / [ed] Olav F. Knudsen, Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2007, s. 123-147Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 28.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Resa genom säkerhetspolitiska debatter2001Ingår i: Internationella studier, ISSN 0020-952X, nr 2, s. 103-106Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 29.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Statsvetenskap.
    [Review of] Research for Whom?: Social Science and Public Policy2004Ingår i: International Studies Review, ISSN 1521-9488, E-ISSN 1468-2486, Vol. 6, s. 333-335Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 30.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    [Review of] "Security: A New Framework for Analysis": Barry Buzan, Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde:2001Ingår i: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, ISSN 0966-0879, E-ISSN 1468-5973, nr 1, s. 61-63Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 31.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    [Review of] "The Ramparts of Nations: Institutions and Immigration Policies in France and the United States". Jeffrey M. Togman2003Ingår i: The international migration review, ISSN 0197-9183, E-ISSN 1747-7379, Vol. 37, nr 3, s. 896-897Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 32.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Rymdkolonier - från fantasi till verklighet?2017Rapport (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
  • 33.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Securitizing IT2001Ingår i: Threat politics: new perspectives on security, risk and crisis management / [ed] Johan Eriksson, Aldershot: Ashgate , 2001, s. 145-163Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 34.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Umeå University, Sweden.
    Security in the Barents Region: Interpretations and Implications of the Norwegian Barents Initiative1995Ingår i: Cooperation and Conflict, ISSN 0010-8367, E-ISSN 1460-3691, Vol. 30, nr 3, s. 259-286Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    This article analyses the new Norwegian security thinking as realized in the establishment of the Barents Region. Two questions are asked: First, how can the security approach of the Barents initiative be conceptualized theoretically? Second, what are the practical implications of this approach? In answering these questions, three problems are focused on: (1) whether security is an issue or a dimension; (2) the unit problem; (3) the problem of change. `Traditionalist' and `revisionist' positions on each of these problems are elaborated and applied in an analysis of the Norwegian Barents initiative. In the Barents framework, Norway approaches security as a dimension rather than as a single issue. Furthermore, security is viewed as primarily concerning the state, but some rhetoric and potential implications indicate that also non-state communities, such as the Sámi people, can be approached as security subjects. Finally, rather than stability in the sense of the status quo, Norway seems to consider predictable change to be a basic aim of the Barents strategy.

  • 35.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Sweden: Small State, Middle Power or, Moral Superpower?2020Ingår i: Middle Powers in Asia and Europe in the 21st-Century / [ed] Giampiero Giacomello; Bertjan Verbeek, London: Lexington Books, 2020, s. 181-201Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
  • 36.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Sweden’s Commitment Problem2003Ingår i: Foreign policy, ISSN 0015-7228, E-ISSN 1945-2276, Vol. 137, nr Jul/Aug, s. 112-113Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
  • 37.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Think tanks and European foreign policy: Transnational politics of expertise2015Ingår i: The SAGE Handbook of European Foreign Policy / [ed] Knud Erik Jrgensen, Åsne Kalland Aarstad, Edith Drieskens, Katie Laatikainen & Ben Tonra, Sage Publications, 2015, s. 442-457Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 38.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Threat framing2020Ingår i: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    What is “threat framing”? It concerns how something or someone is perceived, labeled, and communicated as a threat to something or someone. The designation “threat,” notably, belongs to the wider family of negative concerns such as danger, risk, or hazard. Research on threat framing is not anchored in a single or specific field but rather is scattered across three separate and largely disconnected bodies of literature: framing theory, security studies, and crisis studies. It is noteworthy that whereas these literatures have contributed observations on how and under what consequences something is framed as a threat, none of them have sufficiently problematized the concept of threat. Crisis analysis considers the existence or perception of threat essential for a crisis to emerge, along with a perception of urgency and uncertainty, yet crisis studies focus on the meaning of “crisis” without problematizing the concept of threat. Likewise, security studies have spent a lot of ink defining “security,” typically understood as the “absence of threat,” but leave the notion of “threat” undefined. Further, framing theory is concerned with “problem definition” as a main or first function of framing but generally pays little or no attention to the meaning of “threat.” Moreover, cutting across these bodies of literature is the distinction between constructivist and rationalist approaches, both of which have contributed to the understanding of threat framing. Constructivist analyses have emphasized how threat framing can be embedded in a process of socialization and acculturation, making some frames appear normal and others highly contested. Rationalist approaches, on the other hand, have shown how threat framing can be a conscious strategic choice, intended to accomplish certain political effects such as the legitimization of extraordinary means, allocation of resources, or putting issues high on the political agenda. Although there are only a handful of studies explicitly combining insights across these fields, they have made some noteworthy observations. These studies have shown for example how different types of framing may fuel amity or enmity, cooperation, or conflict. These studies have also found that antagonistic threat frames are more likely to result in a securitizing or militarizing logic than do structural threat frames. Institutionalized threat frames are more likely to gain and maintain saliency, particularly if they are associated with policy monopolies. In the post-truth era, however, the link between evidence and saliency of frames is weakened, leaving room for a much more unpredictable politics of framing.

  • 39.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Threat politics: new perspectives on security, risk and crisis management2001Bok (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 40.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Towards a Theory of Threat Politics2001Ingår i: Threat politics: new perspectives on security, risk and crisis management / [ed] Johan Eriksson, Aldershot: Ashgate , 2001, s. 210-225Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 41.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Avdelning 1, Statsvetenskap.
    Edgren, Helena
    Hotbilder på dagordningen: om ett breddat säkerhetsbegrepp i debatt, media och politik2000Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 42. Eriksson, Johan Emil
    [Review of] The Politics of Information: The Case of the European Union, edited by T. Blom and S. Vanhoonacker (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 20142016Ingår i: Journal of Common Market Studies, ISSN 0021-9886, E-ISSN 1468-5965, Vol. 54, nr 1, s. 204-204Artikel, recension (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 43.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Università di Bologna, Italy.
    Closing the Gap Between International Relations Theory and Studies of Digital Age Security2007Ingår i: International relations and security in the digital age / [ed] Johan Eriksson and Giampiero Giacomello, London: Routledge, 2007, s. 1-36Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 44.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    University of Bologna, Italy.
    Content analysis in the digital age: Tools, functions, and implications for security2013Ingår i: The Secure Information Society: Ethical, Legal and Political Challenges / [ed] Jörg Krüger, Bertram Nickolay, Sandro Gaycken, Springer London, 2013, s. 137-148Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
    Abstract [en]

    Content analysis is an established and effective method for research in the social science and, despite what many think, it has been around for quite some time. It has also tremendously benefited from ICT and the growth of computing power, as computers have proved to excel in the dull routine of scanning texts for keywords. But content analysis has become ubiquitous with the advent of the Internet, particularly emails and Web sites. Keyword search, a pivotal element of content analysis, is the most widespread feature of many Internet applications, from search engines to password-cracking programs. Consequently, it has become a central concern for cybersecurity. This chapter investigates some of the most important applications of content analysis on the Net and discusses its increasing essential position in many areas of cybersecurity.

  • 45.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    University of Bologna, Italy.
    Cyberspace in Space: Fragmentation, Vulnerability, and Uncertainty2022Ingår i: Cyber Security Politics: Socio-Technological Transformations and Political Fragmentation / [ed] Myriam Dunn Cavelty; Andreas Wenger, London: Routledge, 2022, s. 95-107Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    What are the consequences of making cyberspace increasingly reliant on satellites and other types of space infrastructure? And what is the meaning and significance of an interplanetary cyberspace? The chapter addresses these developments specifically concerning infrastructure, militarization, and privatization. The consequences observed are summed up as fragmentation, vulnerability, and uncertainty. Cyberspace in space implies fragmentation in terms of stakeholders and governance, and ultimately in terms of power and accountability. Vulnerability increases as cyberspace becomes satellite-based (space is certainly not a safe environment, and satellites can be attacked by anti-satellite weapons as well as new forms of hacking and denial of service. Uncertainty of is tremendous particularly both in terms of what norms and principles will apply (compare the debate on Internet freedom vs. Internet sovereignty), and whether militarization or civilian and even utopian ideas will prevail.

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    Cyber Security Politics
  • 46.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Università di Bologna, Italy.
    Digital-Age Security in Theory and Practice2007Ingår i: International Relations and Security in the Digital Age / [ed] Johan Eriksson and Giampiero Giacomello, London: Routledge, 2007, s. 173-184Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 47.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, GiampieroUniversity of Bologna, Italy.
    International Relations and Security in the Digital Age2007Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
  • 48.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
    International Relations, Digital Security, and Content Analysis: A Constructivist Approach2014Ingår i: International Relations and the Global Politics of Science and Technology / [ed] Maximilian Mayer, Mariana Carpes, Ruth Knoblich, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014, s. 205-219Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    The development and global diffusion of access to the Internet has—as is the case with most new and game-changing technologies—been accompanied with fears and threat perceptions. This chapter argues, on the one hand, that Constructivist IR theory is particularly suited for addressing and interpreting the threat discourses and identity issues which come in focus in cybersecurity. The ease with which cyber-culprits can hide their identity and location, operating through networks of hijacked computers across the world, makes fear-mongering threat and identity discourses a key issue in cybersecurity. On the other hand, this chapter presents content analysis—a set of quantitative methods focusing on key word searches—as a pertinent or even ubiquitous method for both the study and practice of cybersecurity. Through simple and globally accessible interfaces, the entire Web can be scrutinized using content analysis. Equipped with Constructivist theory and content analysis methods, the IR scholar stands prepared to uncover and better understand the massive discursive world of the Internet.

  • 49.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    University of Bologna, Italy.
    Space and the New Iron Curtain2022Ingår i: Crisis Response Journal, ISSN 1745-8633, Vol. 7, nr 3, s. 84-85Artikel i tidskrift (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm))
    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 50.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Statsvetenskap. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Universita` di Bologna.
    Who controls the Internet?: Beyond the obstinacy or obsolescence of the state2009Ingår i: International Studies Review, ISSN 1521-9488, E-ISSN 1468-2486, Vol. 11, nr 1, s. 206-230Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat)
    Abstract [en]

    With the Internet being a truly global phenomenon, understanding how this is controlled should yield observations of relevance for the study of global governance more generally. The Internet, and how it is controlled, should therefore be a concern for all students of world politics, and not only for the smaller albeit multidisciplinary community of scholars engaging in ‘‘Internet studies.’’ A first step is to acknowledge that Internet control varies across time, space, and issue-areas. To better understand such complex patterns of governance, we need to go beyond universal generalizations. In an attempt to support the middle-range theorizing, which arguably is needed, this essay introduces and briefly unpacks three analytical questions: What are the key aspects of Internet control? What actors might control what aspects of the Internet? And, finally, under what conditions are different types of actors likely to control various aspects of the Internet?

    Ladda ner fulltext (pdf)
    fulltext
12 1 - 50 av 81
RefereraExporteraLänk till träfflistan
Permanent länk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf