sh.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 66
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Sweden: Small State, Middle Power or, Moral Superpower?2020In: Middle Powers in Asia and Europe in the 21st-Century / [ed] Giampiero Giacomello and Bertjan Verbeek, London: Lexington Books, 2020Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Demirel, Cagla
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Competitive victimhood and reconciliation: the case of Turkish–Armenian relations2019In: Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, ISSN 1070-289X, E-ISSN 1547-3384Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper argues that conflicts tend to be intractable if collective victimhood has become a component of national identity, and when conflicting communities claim to be the ‘real’ or ‘only’ victims, and that their suffering justifies crimes past and present. Turkish and Armenian narratives of competitive victimhood are analysed drawing on public opinion polls from Turkey and Armenia, and personal interviews with Turks and Armenians. The study corroborates past theory and research that competitive victimhood prevents reconciliation, particularly if it has become an essential part of national identity. The paper also shows that Turkish–Armenian relations remain at the bottom stage of the reconciliation ladder. Yet, some of our empirical observations suggest that when grass-roots level interaction between Turks and Armenians is facilitated (which has been prevented not least because of the closed border), there is room for the abandonment of competitive victimhood at least on an interpersonal level, if not on a general societal or political level. 

  • 3.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Reischl, Gunilla
    Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Worlds apart, worlds together: Converging and diverging frames in climate and energy governance2019In: Globalizations, ISSN 1474-7731, E-ISSN 1474-774X, Vol. 16, no 1, p. 67-82Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper argues that past research has overlooked how the way problems and solutions are framed contribute to a prevailing gap in the global governance of climate and energy. Empirically, this paper investigates the frames of energy and climate change as expressed in key documents from the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and International Energy Agency (IEA). Partly in contrast to past research, this paper finds (1) that there is a growing similarity in how the IPCC and IEA frame climate and energy; (2) that the IEA has gone from ignoring to acknowledging climate change and the transformation to a low-carbon energy system; and (3) that there is a prevailing difference in emphasis, whereas the IPCC only marginally discuss energy, while the IEA is still mainly talking about energy needs and fossil fuels even if climate change and renewables have entered their agenda.

  • 4.
    Newlove-Eriksson, Lindy
    et al.
    Royal Institute of Technology / Swedish Defence University.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    The Invisible Hand? Critical Information Infrastructures, Commercialisation and National Security2018In: The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, ISSN 0393-2729, E-ISSN 1751-9721, Vol. 53, no 2, p. 124-140Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Corporatisation of critical information infrastructure (CII) is rooted in the ‘privatisation wave’ of the 1980s-90s, when ground was laid for outsourcing public utilities. Despite well-known risks relating to reliability, resilience, and accountability, commitment to efficiency imperatives have driven governments to outsource key public services and infrastructures. A recent illustrative case with enormous implications is the 2017 Swedish ICT scandal, where outsourcing of CII caused major security breaches. With the transfer of the Swedish Transport Agency’s ICT system to IBM and subcontractors, classified data and protected identities were made accessible to non-vetted foreign private employees – the sensitive data could thus now be anywhere. This case clearly demonstrates accountability gaps that can arise in public-private governance of CII.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 5.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Rymdkolonier - från fantasi till verklighet?2017Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 6.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Lagerkvist, Johan
    Stockholm University.
    Cybersecurity in Sweden and China: Going on the Attack?2016In: Conflict in Cyberspace: Theoretical, Strategic and Legal Perspectives / [ed] Kristian Friis and Jens Ringsmose, London: Routledge, 2016, p. 83-94Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 7.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Forskarrollen - att bli publicerad, befordrad och få anslag2016In: Att forska: Praktiker och roller / [ed] Linus Hagström, Niklas Bremberg och Arita Holmberg, Carlsson Bokförlag, 2016, p. 183-205Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 8. Eriksson, Johan Emil
    [Review of] The Politics of Information: The Case of the European Union, edited by T. Blom and S. Vanhoonacker (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 20142016In: Journal of Common Market Studies, ISSN 0021-9886, E-ISSN 1468-5965, Vol. 54, no 1, p. 204-204Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Frontier politics: The realm of dreamers2015In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479, Vol. 1, no 4-5, p. 365-367Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 10.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Think tanks and European foreign policy: Transnational politics of expertise2015In: The SAGE Handbook of European Foreign Policy / [ed] Knud Erik Jrgensen, Åsne Kalland Aarstad, Edith Drieskens, Katie Laatikainen & Ben Tonra, Sage Publications, 2015, p. 442-457Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
    International Relations, Digital Security, and Content Analysis: A Constructivist Approach2014In: International Relations and the Global Politics of Science and Technology / [ed] Maximilian Mayer, Mariana Carpes, Ruth Knoblich, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014, p. 205-219Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The development and global diffusion of access to the Internet has—as is the case with most new and game-changing technologies—been accompanied with fears and threat perceptions. This chapter argues, on the one hand, that Constructivist IR theory is particularly suited for addressing and interpreting the threat discourses and identity issues which come in focus in cybersecurity. The ease with which cyber-culprits can hide their identity and location, operating through networks of hijacked computers across the world, makes fear-mongering threat and identity discourses a key issue in cybersecurity. On the other hand, this chapter presents content analysis—a set of quantitative methods focusing on key word searches—as a pertinent or even ubiquitous method for both the study and practice of cybersecurity. Through simple and globally accessible interfaces, the entire Web can be scrutinized using content analysis. Equipped with Constructivist theory and content analysis methods, the IR scholar stands prepared to uncover and better understand the massive discursive world of the Internet.

  • 12.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    On the Policy Relevance of Grand Theory2014In: International Studies Perspectives, ISSN 1528-3577, E-ISSN 1528-3585, Vol. 15, no 1, p. 94-108Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper challenges the commonly held perception that grand theory is irrelevant for policy. Policy, it is often argued, is in need of detailed case-oriented empirical analysis and instrumental policy recommendations rather than any sweeping generalizations or lofty ideas emanating from grand theory. Notwithstanding, this paper argues that grand theory has an underestimated relevance for policy. To be able to see and appreciate this, the notion of policy relevance must be expanded. Whereas grand theory and grand concepts such as Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism, or Marxism do not provide case-specific knowledge or recommendations, they provide general roadmaps, conceptualization of world affairs, and also have a symbolic function, legitimating or challenging established policy paradigms. Policymakers, akin to grand theorists, arguably like to make sweeping statements and generalizations. Drawing on theory and findings in public policy studies, here applied to international relations and foreign policy, this paper suggests conditions under which grand theory can be relevant for policy.

  • 13.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    University of Bologna, Italy.
    Content analysis in the digital age: Tools, functions, and implications for security2013In: The Secure Information Society: Ethical, Legal and Political Challenges / [ed] Jörg Krüger, Bertram Nickolay, Sandro Gaycken, Springer London, 2013, p. 137-148Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Content analysis is an established and effective method for research in the social science and, despite what many think, it has been around for quite some time. It has also tremendously benefited from ICT and the growth of computing power, as computers have proved to excel in the dull routine of scanning texts for keywords. But content analysis has become ubiquitous with the advent of the Internet, particularly emails and Web sites. Keyword search, a pivotal element of content analysis, is the most widespread feature of many Internet applications, from search engines to password-cracking programs. Consequently, it has become a central concern for cybersecurity. This chapter investigates some of the most important applications of content analysis on the Net and discusses its increasing essential position in many areas of cybersecurity.

  • 14.
    Newlove-Eriksson, Lindy
    et al.
    KTH och FHS.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Utrikespolitiska institutet.
    Governance Beyond the Global: Who Controls the Extraterrestrial?2013In: Globalizations, ISSN 1474-7731, E-ISSN 1474-774X, Vol. 10, no 2, p. 277-292Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    How is outer space governed? This article argues that private authority is gaining salience in space politics, even with respect to the traditionally state-centric security and military aspects of space. Further, while commercial actors have always played a role in space programs, three significant changes can be detected: transnational conglomerates and consortia as opposed to individual corporations are emerging as key partners in space politics; private partners are gaining stronger and wider responsibilities for the development and management of space programs (including manned spaceflights); and public accountability is increasingly at stake due to a widening of security in space policy. The latter development includes a blurring of key distinctions between military and civilian usage (also referred to as dual-use or dual-role application), as well as between the public and private realms.

  • 15.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Peter Håkansson's United Nations Reformed2012In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 114, no 1, p. 166-171Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 16.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Political Territories in a Global Era2011In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 37-43Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 17.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Norman, Ludvig
    Uppsala University.
    Political Utilization of Scholarly Ideas: “The Clash of Civilizations” vs. “Soft Power” in US Foreign Policy2011In: Review of International Studies, ISSN 0260-2105, E-ISSN 1469-9044, Vol. 37, no 1, p. 417-436Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article discusses how and under what conditions ideas coming from International Relations (IR) scholarship are used in foreign policy. We argue that the focus on policy relevance, which dominates the IR literature on the research-policy interface, is limited. Focusing instead on political utilisation highlights types and mechanisms of political impact, which are overlooked in studies on policy relevance. The fruitfulness of this change in focus is showed in an analysis of how Samuel Huntington's ‘clash of civilizations’ notion and Joseph Nye's ‘soft power’ concept have been used in US foreign policy. George W. Bush's explicit critique and reframing of ‘the clash’ thesis should not be interpreted as absence of impact, but as a significant symbolic utilisation, which has helped legitimate US foreign policy. Likewise, in the few instances in which the notion of ‘soft power’ has been used explicitly, it has played a conceptual and symbolical rather than instrumental role. More generally, this article argues that accessible framing and paradigm compatibility are essential for political utilisation of ideas.

  • 18.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Gilek, MichaelSödertörn University, School of Life Sciences, Environmental science.Rudén, Christina
    Regulating chemical risks: European and global challenges2010Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 19.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Karlsson, Mikael
    Södertörn University, School of Life Sciences, Environmental science.
    Reuter, Marta
    Scientific Committees and EU Policy: The Case of SCHER2010In: Regulating chemical risks: European and global challenges / [ed] Johan Eriksson, Michael Gilek, Christina Rudén, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010, p. 301-317Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Karlsson, Mikael
    Södertörn University, School of Life Sciences, Environmental science.
    Reuter, Marta
    Stockholm University.
    Technocracy, Politicization and Non-Involvement: Politics of Expertise in the European Regulation of Chemicals2010In: Review of Policy Research, ISSN 1541-132X, E-ISSN 1541-1338, Vol. 27, no 2, p. 167-185Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article addresses the relationship between scientific expertise and policy in European chemicals regulation. We argue that the role of scientific expertise in the European regulation of chemicals varies across decision-making levels, countries, and stages of the policy process. Our case study of the role of scientific expertise in the regulation of brominated flame retardants illustrates considerably different manifestations of this interconnected process across regulatory arenas, even though this case concerns a single group of substances. On the European Union level, we find a mix of technocracy and politicization; in Sweden, a clear-cut politicization; and in Poland, noninvolvement. Such differences can be explained by a combination of factors, in particular frame dominance, and mobilization of advocacy coalitions.

  • 21.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Jones, Christopher
    Security Concepts in the European North: Swedish and Finnish Security Policy in Comparative Perspective2009In: Security in the West: evolution of a concept / [ed] Giampiero Giacomello, R Craig Nation, Milano: Vita e Pensiero , 2009, p. 141-184Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 22.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Rhinard, Mark
    The Internal-External Security Nexus: Notes on an Emerging Research Agenda2009In: Cooperation and Conflict, ISSN 0010-8367, E-ISSN 1460-3691, Vol. 44, no 3, p. 243-267Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The central contention of this article holds that scholars do not adequately assess and explain the influence of transboundary security issues on government behaviour. Their assessment is not adequate because they do not fully conceptualize the relationship between internal and external security concerns. Their explanations are not adequate because existing theories cannot fully explain how and why states respond to transboundary security issues. To rectify these concerns, stimulate and structure further research, and encourage scholarly dialogue, we build an analytical framework for (a) understanding what we describe as the ‘nexus’ of internal and external security matters, and (b) explaining why that nexus may change state behaviour on transboundary security issues. The resulting framework encourages a strong focus on the nature of transboundary problems before studying their implications for changes in perceptions, policies, politics and polity.

  • 23.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Universita` di Bologna.
    Who controls the Internet?: Beyond the obstinacy or obsolescence of the state2009In: International Studies Review, ISSN 1521-9488, E-ISSN 1468-2486, Vol. 11, no 1, p. 206-230Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    With the Internet being a truly global phenomenon, understanding how this is controlled should yield observations of relevance for the study of global governance more generally. The Internet, and how it is controlled, should therefore be a concern for all students of world politics, and not only for the smaller albeit multidisciplinary community of scholars engaging in ‘‘Internet studies.’’ A first step is to acknowledge that Internet control varies across time, space, and issue-areas. To better understand such complex patterns of governance, we need to go beyond universal generalizations. In an attempt to support the middle-range theorizing, which arguably is needed, this essay introduces and briefly unpacks three analytical questions: What are the key aspects of Internet control? What actors might control what aspects of the Internet? And, finally, under what conditions are different types of actors likely to control various aspects of the Internet?

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 24.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Who Controls the Internet?: Beyond the Obstinancy or Obsolescence of the State2009In: International Studies Review, ISSN 1521-9488, E-ISSN 1468-2486, Vol. 11, no 1, p. 205-210Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 25.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Università di Bologna, Italy.
    Closing the Gap Between International Relations Theory and Studies of Digital Age Security2007In: International relations and security in the digital age / [ed] Johan Eriksson and Giampiero Giacomello, London: Routledge, 2007, p. 1-36Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 26.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Università di Bologna, Italy.
    Digital-Age Security in Theory and Practice2007In: International Relations and Security in the Digital Age / [ed] Johan Eriksson and Giampiero Giacomello, London: Routledge, 2007, p. 173-184Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 27.
    Bendrath, Ralf
    et al.
    University of Bremen, Germany.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, Giampiero
    Università di Bologna, Italy.
    From Cyberterrorism to Cyberwar, Back and Forth: How the United States Securitized Cyberspace2007In: International relations and security in the digital age / [ed] Johan Eriksson and Giampiero Giacomello, London: Routledge, 2007, p. 57-82Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 28.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University College, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Hur och när påverkar forskning utrikespolitik?2007In: Internationella Studier, ISSN 0020-952X, no 1, p. 64-76Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Hosein, Ian
    et al.
    London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), United Kingdom.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    International Policy Dynamics and the Regulation of Dataflows: Bypassing Domestic Restrictions2007In: International relations and security in the digital age / [ed] Johan Eriksson and Giampiero Giacomello, London: Routledge, 2007, p. 158-172Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 30.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science. Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
    Giacomello, GiampieroUniversity of Bologna, Italy.
    International Relations and Security in the Digital Age2007Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 31.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science. Institute of International Affairs.
    Power Disparity in the Digital Age2007In: Security strategies, power disparity and identity: the Baltic Sea region / [ed] Olav F. Knudsen, Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2007, p. 123-147Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Noreen, Erik
    Södertörn University College, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Hotbildsentreprenörens verktygslåda2006Report (Other academic)
  • 33.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Noreen, Erik
    Södertörn University College, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Hur man säljer hot2006In: Axess, ISSN 1651-0941, no 8, p. 6-7Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 34.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University College, School of Political Science, Economics and Law, Political science.
    Konstruktivism2006In: Internationella relationer / [ed] Jakob Gustavsson & Jonas Tallberg, Lund: Studentlitteratur , 2006, 1, p. 87-102Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 35.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University College, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Nationell nyhetskultur i globaliseringens tidevarv2006In: Internationella studier, ISSN 0020-952X, no 4, p. 80-83Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 36.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science. Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Giampiero, Giacomello
    Università di Bologna, Italy.
    The Information Revolution, Security and International Relations: (IR)relevant Theory?2006In: International Political Science Review, ISSN 0192-5121, E-ISSN 1460-373X, Vol. 27, no 3, p. 221-244Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The purpose of this article is twofold: to analyze the impact of the information revolution on security and to clarify what existing international relations theory can say about this challenge. These pertinent questions are initially addressed by a critical review of past research. This review shows that the concern for security issues is largely confined to a specialist literature on information warfare and cyber-security, while neither the general literature on information society nor security studies pay any serious attention to information-technology-related security issues. The specialist literature is mostly policy oriented, and only very rarely informed by theory, whether from the international relations discipline or any other field. In this article, three general international relations “schools” (realism, liberalism, and constructivism) are scrutinized with regard to what they can say about security in the digital age. It is argued that the liberal focus on pluralism, interdependence, and globalization, the constructivist emphasis on language, symbols, and images (including “virtuality”), and some elements of realist strategic studies (on information warfare) contribute to an understanding of digital-age security. Finally, it is suggested that pragmatism might help to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and overcome the dualistic, contending nature of international relations theories.

  • 37.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Political Science, Economics and Law, Political science.
    Sundelius, Bengt
    Uppsala University and Swedish National Defence College.
    Molding Minds That Form Policy: How to Make Research Useful2005In: International Studies Perspectives, ISSN 1528-3577, E-ISSN 1528-3585, Vol. 6, no 1, p. 51-71Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    How can policy-relevant ideas be effectively communicated to practitioners? While the existing literature has focused on what kind of theory and research are policy relevant, it does not say much about how this knowledge can be communicated. If you want to make a difference, you must know how to reach your target. We take note of the important, but in this context often overlooked opportunities for knowledge diffusion that are provided by the education of young minds and the training of mid-career officials and officers. This article first discusses three contending perspectives on the relationship between scholars and practitioners. It then makes a conceptual elaboration of conditions for communicating research to practitioners, drawing on a wide body of literature on the power of ideas. We conclude by summarizing pointers for how scholars may reflect and how we can act, if we wish to enrich foreign policy practice with research-based ideas.

  • 38.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Political science.
    Kampen om hotbilden: rutin och drama i svensk säkerhetspolitik2004Book (Other academic)
  • 39.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University College, Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Political science.
    [Review of] Research for Whom?: Social Science and Public Policy2004In: International Studies Review, ISSN 1521-9488, E-ISSN 1468-2486, Vol. 6, p. 333-335Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 40.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Myten om hemlandets säkerhet2003In: Internationella studier, ISSN 0020-952X, no 2, p. 3-9Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 41.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    [Review of] "The Ramparts of Nations: Institutions and Immigration Policies in France and the United States". Jeffrey M. Togman2003In: The international migration review, ISSN 0197-9183, E-ISSN 1747-7379, Vol. 37, no 3, p. 896-897Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 42.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Sweden’s Commitment Problem2003In: Foreign policy, ISSN 0015-7228, E-ISSN 1945-2276, Vol. 137, no Jul/Aug, p. 112-113Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 43. Karppi, Kristina
    et al.
    Eriksson, JohanSödertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Conflict and cooperation in the North2002Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 44.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Karppi, Kristiina
    Continuity and Change in State-Saami Relations2002In: Conflict and cooperation in the North / [ed] Kristiina Karppi & Johan Eriksson, Umeå: Kulturgräns norr , 2002, p. 361-373Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 45.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Explaining Security Agenda Setting: Beyond the Domestic Realm2002In: Cooperation or competition?: a juxtaposition of research problems regarding security in the Baltic Sea Region / [ed] Olav F Knudsen, Huddinge: Södertörns högskola , 2002, p. 81-92Conference paper (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    Explaining Security Agenda Setting: Beyond the Domestic Realm
  • 46.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Karppi, Kristiina
    Mapping State-Saami Relations?2002In: Conflict and Cooperation in the North: States and the Saami People / [ed] Kristiina Karppi & Johan Eriksson, Umeå: Kulturgräns norr , 2002, p. 23-28Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 47.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Noreen, Erik
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Setting the agenda of threats: an explanatory model2002Report (Other academic)
  • 48.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Karppi, Kristiina
    The Construction of Sápmi: Towards a Transnational Polity?2002In: Conflict and cooperation in the North / [ed] Kristiina Karppi & Johan Eriksson, Umeå: Kulturgräns norr , 2002, p. 239-250Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 49.
    Eriksson, Johan
    et al.
    Södertörn University College, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Stern, Eric K
    Sundelius, Bengt
    Uppsala University.
    Bridging theory and practice in crisis management: The Swedish experience2001In: EU civilian crisis management / [ed] Graeme Herd, Jouko Huru, Surrey: Camberley , 2001, p. 19-33Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 50.
    Eriksson, Johan
    Södertörn University, Avdelning 1, Political science.
    Cyberplagues, IT, and Security: Threat Politics in the Information Age.2001In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, ISSN 0966-0879, E-ISSN 1468-5973, Vol. 9, no 4, p. 211-222Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The swiftness and considerable political impact of the widespread conceptualisation of IT as a security problem makes it a particularly fruitful case for analysing threat politics – how and why some threat images but not others end up on the political agenda. A conceptual framework combining theories of framing, securitisation, agenda setting and policy diffusion is developed, which is applied to the case of IT security policy in Sweden. The analysis emphasises the impact of the end of the Cold War, the uncertainty following the breakthrough of the information age, the tradition of focusing on information and technological development in military affairs, the adaptability to ‘widened security thinking’ within the military-bureaucratic establishment, and the lack of opposition to the securitisation of IT.

12 1 - 50 of 66
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf