The aim of this study is to examine the market reaction when information about a company’s foreign direct investment is announced and how that affects the shareholder’s value. Also of interest is whether the market reacts differently depending on which country the investment is established in and which mode of entry is used. This will be achieved by using an event study approach. The selection that was used consisted of 206 companies registered on the Nasdaq OMX Nordic homepage, which had during a time period stretching from 1999 to 2009 established a foreign direct investment in the regions BRIC, Europe or the USA using the mode of organic growth, joint venture or acquisition. The units were submitted to a hypothesis test, this was done to determine if an abnormal return was attained during the event window. The event window consisted of eleven days, five days before the announcement and five days after, which includes the announcement day. The tests were performed on the units as a whole and divided into categories depending on mode of entry, region and country. The event study was accompanied by a questionnaire.

The result of the study show no statistically significant abnormal return related to the announcement of a foreign direct investment. There were however some indications of a deviation when the units were divided into region, most noticeably between the regions BRIC, which showed a steady negative development, and Europe, which showed a steady positive development. These results were however not significant.

The goal of this study is to examine how the market reacts when information about the exchange of a CEO becomes public. It also examines factors such as gender and whether the departure was voluntary or not, discerning if the market behaves differently concerning any of these aspects.To achieve this, the study was performed using an event study. The selection consisted of 48 companies on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, who had during the years 2005 to 2008 underwent a change in leading management. These units were submitted to hypothesis tests, to determine if an abnormal return was attained during the event window. The tests were performed on the units as a whole, and divided up after gender and whether the departure was voluntary or not.The results of the study show no statistically significant abnormal return caused by the announcement of a CEO exchange. There were however some indications of a deviation when the units were divided between voluntary and involuntary departure, though not strong enough to be considered significant. Not even when the days of the event window were divided and examined separately, did the results show any significant reaction. This can be an indication that the semi‐strong version of the Efficient Market Hypothesis is not at work.