sh.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 50 of 50
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1. Andersson, Staffan
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Controlling Corruption in the Public Sector2009In: Scandinavian Political Studies, ISSN 0080-6757, E-ISSN 1467-9477, Vol. 32, no 1, p. 45-70Article, review/survey (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Much of the literature on political corruption is based on indices such as the ones presented by Transparency International, but the reliability and validity of these indices are questionable. The main alternative approach – qualitative case studies – often lacks a theoretical framework allowing for systematic empirical analysis. To remedy this shortcoming, this article places qualitative case studies into the framework of principal-agent theory. The cases comprise two Swedish county councils (regional governments), both of which reorganised their administrations in similar ways in the 1990s. One experienced corruption scandals, but the other did not. In comparing them, the article links the propensity for corruption to institutional design – in particular, the mechanisms of delegation and control.

  • 2. Andersson, Therese
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Unionens byråkrater: kommissionen och de svenska statstjänstemännen2005In: EU och Sverige: ett sammanlänkat statsskick / [ed] Magnus Blomgren, Torbjörn Bergman, Stockholm: Liber , 2005, 1, p. 150-169Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 3.
    Aylott, Nicholas
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    When median-legislator theory fails: the Swedish Greens in 1998 and 20022011In: Puzzles of Government Formation: Coalition theory and deviant cases / [ed] Rudy W Andeweg, Lieven De Winter, Patrick Dumont, London: Routledge, 2011, p. 44-64Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 4.
    Aylott, Nicholas
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Södertörn University, Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES).
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Umeå universitet.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Umeå universitet.
    Political Parties in Multi-Level Polities: The Nordic Countries Compared2013 (ed. 1)Book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Political parties are essential for parliamentary democracy, the form of government that prevails in most European states. But how have parties adapted to modern society – not least a new layer of political decision-making in the EU? Should we talk of a crisis of party democracy?

    This book reports the findings of a comparative survey of parties in four Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland and Sweden, all EU member states; and Norway, which remains outside the Union. Using original data, it explores how power is exercised within party organisations and their respective parliamentary groups.

    Within an analytical framework that envisages a party as a series of delegation relationships, the book illuminates how leaders are chosen, how election candidates are selected, how manifestos are written – and how a party's various elements are co-ordinated. For all the challenges posed by multi-level governance, parties retain much of their capacity for making democracy work.

  • 5. Bale, Tim
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    A Taste of Honey Is Worse Than None at All?2006In: Party Politics, ISSN 1354-0688, E-ISSN 1460-3683, Vol. 12, no 2, p. 189-202Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Some parties support rather than join the executive, thereby operating in a grey area between opposition and office – in governance but not in government. Previous research on the New Zealand Greens’ experience as a support party has shown that this liminal position may prove a blessing or a curse – or, more likely, a mixture of both. This article compares the experience of the Swedish Greens. While the Swedish party gained more on policy, it suffered the same frustrations as its Kiwi counterpart with regard to consultation, to the media and to a government that could potentially find support elsewhere. It, too, avoided overwhelming internal tensions, but was likewise left wanting more. Neither party broke into government at the next election, but tried to put lessons learned into practice when supporting centre–left cabinets once again. That the challenges encountered were so similar suggests the possibility that they are common to support parties elsewhere.

  • 6. Bale, Tim
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Captives No Longer, but Servants Still?: Contract Parliamentarism and the New Minority Governance in Sweden and New Zealand2006In: Government and Opposition, ISSN 0017-257X, E-ISSN 1477-7053, Vol. 41, no 3, p. 422-449Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Abstract Recent years have seen the institutionalization of minority governance in Sweden and New Zealand. Large, historic social democratic labour parties enjoy comparative security of tenure thanks to smaller, newer parties with whom they have signed long-term, detailed support agreements covering both policy and process. This trend toward ‘contract parliamentarism’ owes much to party-system dynamics, but also to the accretion of experience, to cultural norms and to institutional constraints – all of which, along with electoral contingency, explain why the trend has gone slightly further in one polity than in the other. While the trend seems to favour the left in general, its implications for the support or ‘servant’ parties, and – more normatively – for democracy itself, may be less favourable.

  • 7. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Anmeldelse: Mathew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg eds ; Mixed-Member Electoral Systems2005In: Tidsskriftet GRUS, ISSN 0107-0495, no 75/76, p. 183-185Article, book review (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 8. Bergman, Torbjörn
    [Book review of] Bjørn Erik Rasch: Kampen om regjeringsmakten. Norsk parlamentarisme i europeisk perspektiv2005In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, ISSN 0040-716X, E-ISSN 1504-291X, no 3, p. 420-422Article, book review (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 9. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Demokrati på två nivåer2003In: Valutaunionen, författningsfrågan och östutvidgningen / [ed] Sverker Gustavsson, Lars Oxelheim & Nils Wahl, Stockholm: Santérus , 2003, p. 133-150Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 10.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Umeå universitet.
    Erik Oddvar Eriksen & John Erik Fossum (red): Det norske paradoks. Om Norges forhold til Den europeiske uninon. Anmeldt av Torbjörn Bergman2014In: Sosiologi i dag, ISSN 0332-6330, E-ISSN 1893-4617, Vol. 44, no 2, p. 86-90Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Internationella samarbeten och stora databaser2010In: Kontraster och nyanser: Svensk statsvetenskap i brytningstid / [ed] Magnus Jerneck & Björn Badersten, Lund: Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift , 2010, p. 645-653Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 12. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Introduction: Delegation and accountability in European Integration2000In: Journal of Legislative Studies, ISSN 1357-2334, E-ISSN 1743-9337, Vol. 6, no 1, p. 1-14Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 13. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Parlamentarism2003In: Svensk författningspolitik / [ed] Ingvar Mattson, Olof Petersson, Stockholm: SNS förlag, 2003, 1. uppl., p. 135-152Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 14. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Parliamentary Democracy in Scandinavia: Shifting Dimensions of Citizen Control2004Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 15.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    [Recension av] Pålsson, Anne-Marie, 2011. Knapptryckarkompaniet: rapport från Sveriges riksdag. Stockholm: Bokförlaget Atlantis AB: Anmälan2012In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 114, no 4, p. 585-587Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 16. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Sweden: Democratic Reforms and Partisan Decline in an Emerging Separation-of-Powers System2004In: Scandinavian Political Studies, ISSN 0080-6757, E-ISSN 1467-9477, Vol. 27, no 2, p. 203-225Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Early in the twentieth century, parliamentary democracy developed within an 1809 constitution based on separation of powers. By the mid-1970s, the last remnants of this constitution had disappeared. After that, measures such as more openness in candidate nominations, positive preference voting and more scrutiny by parliamentarians were introduced to strengthen the democratic chain. But a weakening of political parties and an increased importance of external constraints are again moving Sweden towards a de facto separation-of-powers system. There is once again a considerable discrepancy between the written constitutional framework and the ‘working constitution’. In particular, local and supranational constraints on national policy making provide reason for a reconsideration of the constitutional framework.

  • 17. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Sweden: From Separation of Power to Parliamentary Supremacy – and Back Again?2003In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary democracies / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2003, p. 594-619Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 18. Bergman, Torbjörn
    Sweden: when minority cabinets are the rule and majority coalitions the exception2000In: Coalition Governments in Western Europe / [ed] Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2000, Vol. S. [192]-230 : tab., p. 192-230Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 19. Bergman, Torbjörn
    The European Union as the next step of delegation and accountability2000In: European Journal of Political Research, ISSN 0304-4130, E-ISSN 1475-6765, Vol. 37, no 3, p. 415-429Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The Principal–Agent approach guides a comparison of the scrutiny and implementation records of the EU member states. The main argument is that there is systematic co–variation. Cross–nationally, an influential scrutiny process is associated with a strong implementation record. But because both of these variables also co–vary with the North–South dimension of EU politics, a fundamental challenge for future research is to evaluate the importance of existing between–country variation relative to the new Principal–Agent relationships that are emerging within the integration process.

  • 20.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Umeå universitet.
    Är riksdagen viktig?2013In: Statsvetenskapens frågor / [ed] Li Bennich-Björkman, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2013, p. 166-174Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 21. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Aylott, Nicholas
    Parlamentarism per kontrakt?: Blir den svenska innovationen långlivad?2003In: Riksdagens årsbok, ISSN 0346-5470, Vol. 2002/03, p. 4-7Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 22.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Bolin, Niklas
    Umeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
    Swedish democracy: crumbling political parties, a feeble riksdag, and technocratic power holders?2011In: The Madisonian turn: political parties and parliamentary democracy in Nordic Europe / [ed] Torbjörn Bergman and Kaare Strøm, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011, p. 251-293Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 23.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Umeå universitet.
    Ecker, Alejandro
    University of Vienna.
    Müller, Wolfgang C.
    University of Vienna.
    How Parties Govern: Political Parties and the Internal Organization of Government2013In: Party Governance and Party Democracy: Festschrift to Kaare Strøm / [ed] Wolfgang C Müller & Hanne Marthe Narud, New York: Springer, 2013, p. 33-50Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 24.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Umeå University.
    Ersson, Svante
    Umeå University.
    Hellström, Johan
    Umeå University.
    Government formation and breakdown in Western and Central Eastern Europe2015In: Comparative European Politics, ISSN 1472-4790, E-ISSN 1740-388X, Vol. 13, no 3, p. 345-375Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article, we use a new data set describing governments, political parties and institutions to make an explicit comparison between Western Europe (WE) and Central Eastern Europe (CEE) in the investigation of three different topical issues found in the coalition literature, namely, coalition formation (that is, which factors affect who forms the winning coalitions), the number of cabinet members (that is, what affects the number of ministers in a cabinet) and cabinet duration (that is, which factors affect how long a new government lasts). Our findings indicate that, regardless of all the discussions about how CEE is different from WE because of the post-communist heritage or the volatility of voters in the CEE region, structural attributes such as the size and number of political parties are important determinants of coalition formation and cabinet duration patterns in both the West and the East. In fact, precisely because of the unsettled nature of CEE party politics, structural attributes tend to matter even more in the East.

  • 25. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Gerber, Elisabeth R.
    Kastner, Scott
    Nyblade, Benjamin
    The Empirical Study of Cabinet Governance2008In: Cabinets and coalition bargaining: the democractic life cycle in Western Europe / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2008, p. 85-122Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 26.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political Science. Umeå universitet.
    Hellström, Johan
    Umeå universitet.
    Country-specific configurations and constants in cross-national variable analysis2014Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 27. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Larue, Thomas
    Le régime parlementaire en Suède 2004In: Vers un renouveau du parlementarisme en Europe? / [ed] Olivier Costa, Eric Kerrouche, Paul Magnette, Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles , 2004, p. 231-254Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 28. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C.
    Strøm, Kaare
    Comparative parliamentary democracy: a project report2005In: European Political Science, ISSN 1680-4333, Vol. 4, no 1, p. 42-54Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The Comparative Parliamentary Democracy project examines West European parliamentary politics from a principal-agent perspective. The project involves thirty-five scholars from Western Europe and the Americas. It has made both conceptual and empirical contributions in the fields of comparative politics, parliamentary democracy in general and coalition politics in particular. In this report, the project leaders present the project, its ᅵstructured collaborationᅵ approach and share some observations on the practice of conducting a large-scale cross-national project.

  • 29. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C.
    Strøm, Kaare
    Introduction: Parliamentary democracy and the chain of delegation2000In: European Journal of Political Research, ISSN 0304-4130, E-ISSN 1475-6765, Vol. 37, no 3, p. 255-260Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 30. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C.Strøm, Kaare
    Parliamentary democracy and the chain of delegation: special issue2000Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 31. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C
    Strøm, Kaare
    Blomgren, Magnus
    Democratic Delegation and Accountability: Cross-national Patterns2003In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary democracies. / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2003, p. 109-120Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 32. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Raunio, Tapio
    Parliaments and policy-making in the European Union2001In: European Union: Power and Policy-making / [ed] Jeremy Richardson, London: Routledge , 2001, 2, p. 115-130Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Written by some of the leading authorities in the field, this new edition has been significantly improved to provide students with even more authoritative and comprehensive coverage of how European Union policy is made.

  • 33.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Strøm, Kaare
    University of California, San Diego.
    Nordic Europe in comparative perspective2011In: The Madisonian turn: political parties and parliamentary democracy in Nordic Europe / [ed] Torbjörn Bergman and Kaare Strøm, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011, p. 35-64Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 34. Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Strøm, Kaare
    Shifting Dimensions of Citizen Control2004In: Scandinavian Political Studies, ISSN 0080-6757, E-ISSN 1467-9477, Vol. 27, no 2, p. 89-113Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    European politics is still dominated by representative and parliamentary national systems of policy making. These systems can be seen as chains of political delegation from citizens through parliamentarians and executive office holders to civil servants. In these chains, a major trend for the past thirty years, and more strongly during the second half of that period, is a strengthening of agents’ accountability to the principals. But, simultaneously, citizens’ ability to exercise accountability through parliamentary democracy is eroding because of a decline in political party cohesion. Concurrently, constraints external to both the constitutional chain and political parties are growing stronger.The changes along these three dimensions lead to a situation in which democratic principals commonly decide more about less. Thus, while reforms have strengthened the constitutional parliamentary chain of governance, there is also an ongoing de-parliamentarisation of modern politics. The main motivation for this special issue is to investigate this general phenomenon through a set of focused case studies of the Nordic (here known as ‘Scandinavian’) countries. These analyses show important differences in how these trends have been manifest. In one country, Finland, the parliamentary chain has actually grown in strength and importance in the last decade.

  • 35.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Strøm, KaareUniversity of California, San Diego.
    The Madisonian Turn: Political Parties and Parliamentary Democracy in Nordic Europe2011Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 36.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    et al.
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Strøm, Kaare
    University of California, San Diego.
    The Nordics: demanding citizens, complex polities2011In: The Madisonian turn: political parties and parliamentary democracy in Nordic Europe / [ed] Torbjörn Bergman and Kaare Strøm, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011, p. 356-387Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 37. Blomgren, Magnus
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    EU och Sverige: ett sammanlänkat statsskick2005 (ed. 1. uppl.)Book (Other academic)
  • 38. Damgaard, Erik
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Delegation and accountability in European integration: the Nordic parliamentary democracies and the European Union2000Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Analyzing the effects of the European Union on national decision-making and the chain of delegation and accountability, the authors look at Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Iceland and Norway.

  • 39. Müller, Wolfgang C
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Strøm, Kaare
    Parliamentary Democracy: Promise and Problem2003In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary democracies / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2003, p. 3-32Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 40. Müller, Wolfgang C.
    et al.
    Strøm, Kaare
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Coalition Theory and Cabinet Governance: an introduction2008In: Cabinets and coalition bargaining: the democractic life cycle in Western Europe / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2008, p. 1-50Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 41. Reniu, Josep M.
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Estrategias, objetivos y toma de decisiones de los partidos políticos españoles en la formación de gobiernos estatales = Spanish political parties’ strategies, goals and decision-making during the formation of national governments2003In: Política y Sociedad, ISSN 1130-8001, Vol. 40, no 2, p. 63-76Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The paper deals with the study of the strategies developed by spanish political parties during government formation processes at national level. Starting from the discussion on the goals pursued byparties, we analize the strategies leading to reduce costs and increase benefits in the socalled processess.Thus, we observe that the absence of coalition governments in Spain is due to strategic calculus, thatdeny the usual assumptions accepted by formal theories of political coalitions.

  • 42.
    Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    University of California, San Diego.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Political science.
    Parliamentary democracies under siege?2011In: The Madisonian turn: political parties and parliamentary democracy in Nordic Europe / [ed] Torbjörn Bergman and Kaare Strøm, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011, p. 3-34Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 43. Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Partierna och regeringsmakten2005In: Partiernas århundrade: fempartimodellens uppgång och fall i Norge och Sverige / [ed] Marie Demker & Lars Svåsand, Stockholm: Santérus , 2005, Vol. S. 279-[329], p. 279-[329]Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 44. Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Müller, Wolfgang C.
    Nyblade, Benjamin
    Conclusion: Cabinet Governance in Parliamentary Democracies2008In: Cabinets and coalition bargaining: the democractic life cycle in Western Europe / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2008, p. 403-430Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 45. Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C.Bergman, Torbjörn
    Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democractic Life Cycle in Western Europe2008Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    "Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe provides a comprehensive analysis of coalition politics in Western Europe over the post-war period. It champions a dynamic approach in which the various stages in the life of coalitions influence each other. After a review of the literature a theory chapter addresses the roles of bargaining and transaction costs in coalition governance. Eight comparative chapters address the topics of government formation (government type, formation duration), coalition agreements, portfolio allocation, conflict management, cabinet termination and duration, and the electoral consequences of coalition government. The book is based on the most comprehensive data set ever employed in coalition studies that includes both coalitional and single-party countries and governments. Each chapter first provides a comparative overview of the phenomenon under study and then moves on to state-of-the art statistical analysis. Conceptually and in the statistical analysis the study argues for an integrated approach stressing the relevance of countries, time, 'structural attributes', actors' preferences, institutions, the coalition's bargaining environment, and 'critical events'. Indeed, sufficient explanations of most phenomena under study require independent variables from several of these categories"--Jacket.

  • 46. Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Challenges to Parliamentary Democracy2003In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary democracies / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2003, p. 707-750Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 47. Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies2003Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Parliamentary democracy is the most common way of organizing delegation and accountability in contemporary democracies. Yet knowledge of this type of regime has been incomplete and often unsystematic. Aiming to provide conceptual clarity, this work shows how representation issues can be understood.

  • 48. Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C.
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    The (moral) hazards of parliamentary democracy2006In: Delegation In Contemporary Democracies, London ; New York: Routledge/ECPR , 2006, p. 27-51Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 49. Strøm, Kaare
    et al.
    Müller, Wolfgang C
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Nyblade, Benjamin
    Dimensions of Citizen Control2003In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary democracies / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2003, p. 651-706Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 50. Trantas, Georgios
    et al.
    Zagoriti, Paraskevi
    Bergman, Torbjörn
    Müller, Wolfgang C
    Strøm, Kaare
    Greece: ’Rationalizing’ Constitutional Powers in a Post-Dictatorial Country2003In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary democracies / [ed] Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, Torbjörn Bergman, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2003, p. 376-398Chapter in book (Other academic)
1 - 50 of 50
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf