sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Participation and deliberation in Swedish forest governance: The process of initiating a National Forest Program
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.
2016 (English)In: Forest Policy and Economics, ISSN 1389-9341, E-ISSN 1872-7050, Vol. 70, 137-146 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Over the last two decades intergovernmental organizations have supported the initiation of National Forest Programs (NFPs): forums for joint deliberation by the state, private companies and NGOs that are intended to resolve conflicts over forestry and enhance sustainability. However, NFPs do not always reconcile conflicting perspectives or produce legitimate strategies for sustainable forestry. Thus, further analysis of NFPs' organization and processes is required, including exploration of effective means to address such challenges in early stages. These are key concerns of this paper, focusing on the first process to establish a Swedish NFP. Possibilities for an NFP to constitute a new arena for deliberation and consensus-building, producing forest policy statements and action plans considered legitimate by various stakeholders, are discussed. A number of key challenges are identified through a theoretical framework based on notions regarding the input and output legitimacy of collaborative governance. Analysis of official documentation, records of public hearings and stakeholder comments from the establishment phase in 2013–2015 suggests that the process will continually face a number of challenges, including balancing production and conservation values in the new bio-economy and securing equal stakeholder participation. The paper concludes with some remarks on the future of the NFP process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 70, 137-146 p.
Keyword [en]
Bio-economy, Collaborative governance, Deliberation, Forest governance, Legitimacy, National Forest Program
National Category
Environmental Sciences Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-30625DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.001ISI: 000381534100017Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84976286769OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-30625DiVA: diva2:949528
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Available from: 2016-07-20 Created: 2016-07-18 Last updated: 2016-10-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Johansson, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Johanna
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Environmental SciencesPolitical Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 93 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf