Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Risk and functional significance of psychotic experiences among individuals with depression in 44 low- and middle-income countries
Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain / CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain.
University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, USA / Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Oakland, USA.
Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Sociology. Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, SCOHOST (Stockholm Centre on Health of Societies in Transition).
Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain / CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Psychological Medicine, ISSN 0033-2917, E-ISSN 1469-8978, Vol. 43, no 12, 2655-2665 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Background: Studies on whether the co-occurrence of psychotic experiences (PEs) and depression confers a more pronounced decrement in health status and function compared with depression alone are scarce in the general adult population. Method: Data on 195 479 adults aged ⩾18 years from the World Health Survey were analysed. Using the World Mental Health Survey version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), depression in the past 12 months was categorized into four groups: depressive episode, brief depressive episode, subsyndromal depression, and no depression. Past 12-month psychotic symptoms were assessed using four questions on positive symptoms from the CIDI. Health status across seven domains (cognition, interpersonal activities, sleep/energy, self-care, mobility, pain/discomfort, vision) and interviewer-rated presence of a mental health problem were assessed. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to assess the associations. Results: When compared with those with no depression, individuals with depression had higher odds of reporting at least one PE, and this was seen across all levels of depression severity: subsyndromal depression [odds ratio (OR) 2.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02–2.81], brief depressive episode (OR 3.84, 95% CI 3.31–4.46) and depressive episode (OR 3.75, 95% CI 3.24–4.33). Having coexisting PEs and depression was associated with a higher risk for observable illness behavior and a significant decline in health status in the cognition, interpersonal activities and sleep/energy domains, compared with those with depression alone. Conclusions: This coexistence of depression and PEs is associated with more severe social, cognitive and sleep disturbances, and more outwardly apparent illness behavior. Detecting this co-occurrence may be important for treatment planning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 43, no 12, 2655-2665 p.
Keyword [en]
Depression, epidemiology, health status, multi-country studies, psychotic experiences
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-30627DOI: 10.1017/S0033291716001422ISI: 000382567600018PubMedID: 27377628OAI: diva2:949347
Available from: 2016-07-19 Created: 2016-07-18 Last updated: 2016-10-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stickley, Andrew
By organisation
SociologySCOHOST (Stockholm Centre on Health of Societies in Transition)
In the same journal
Psychological Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 31 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link