sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
‘Environmental Governance’ and ‘Ecosystem Management’: Avenues for Synergies between Two Approaches
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8796-6216
eibniz Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning (IRS) & University of Potsdam, Germany.
Örebro universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7215-2623
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8536-373X
2016 (English)In: Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, ISSN 1521-0227, E-ISSN 2042-6992, Vol. 17, no 1, p. 1-19Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Based on a literature review of over 160 journal articles and books, this paper examines the ecosystem management and environmental governance approaches, and looks for common topics and integrated research agendas. While scientific articles on environmental governance stem primarily from social science research, the ecosystem management approach is more natural-science-oriented. A review of journal articles from the ISI Web of Knowledge (Web of Science) reveals that the two research communities hardly interact. The paper discusses two thematic linkages between the two approaches: the debates dealing with the scale and level of environmental policy; and the discussions surrounding multi-stakeholder participation. Moreover, the article identifies areas with a high potential for the establishment of common ground, such as the current discussion on science-policy interfaces. We argue for more interaction, claim that the two research approaches can learn from each other, and discuss the potential for the development of interdisciplinary research agendas

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 17, no 1, p. 1-19
Keywords [en]
environmental governance; ecosystem management; scale; level; multi-stakeholder participation; science-policy interface
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-29629DOI: 10.1504/IER.2016.074871OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-29629DiVA, id: diva2:908139
Available from: 2016-03-01 Created: 2016-03-01 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Regional Environmental Governance and Avenues for the Ecosystem Approach to management in the Baltic Sea Area
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Regional Environmental Governance and Avenues for the Ecosystem Approach to management in the Baltic Sea Area
2017 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis explores the avenues for the ecosystem approach to management in the Baltic Sea Region. This region is one of the most contaminated water bodies in the world, although the first Regional Seas Convention was created here and theregion has a long history of cooperation and environmental protection. The current environmental governance arrangements are examined with specific focuson governance structures, cross-sectoral integration and ecological boundaries.The ecosystem approach to management as both a tool and vision of holistic management of natural resources is traced through the evolution of environmental governance, as well as its manifestation in contemporary environmental policies in the region. It is found that the major EU directives, as well as HELCOM polices, promote the ecosystem approach and that its presence has increased inrecent years; it is now the major guiding principle in European marine governance. However, the governance structures impede implementation indifferent ways. The environmental problem areas in the region all require different governance arrangements, thus obstructing a holistic approach. The environmental problems per se also affect each other, necessitating far-reaching sectoral integration and cross-border cooperation, which at present is the major obstacle regarding implementation. The contemporary trends combining solid regionalisation through HELCOM with increased Europeanisation and macro regionalisation by different EU initiatives offer some promise, but the cross sectoral impediments must be resolved if the ecosystem approach is to become apractical approach and not just a policy principle.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2017. p. 61
Keywords
Regional Environmental Governance, Ecosystem Approach to Management, Baltic Sea, HELCOM, EU, Shipping
National Category
Environmental Sciences Environmental Analysis and Construction Information Technology Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-32150 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-133976 (DOI)9789176856062 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-02-17, Temcas, hus T, Campus Valla, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European StudiesEU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 217246
Available from: 2017-02-22 Created: 2017-02-22 Last updated: 2017-02-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(718 kB)377 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 718 kBChecksum SHA-512
6cff8c30851aa4062c3d57ed85d79b2ef5476bc39872085cb68d8815d678a48d0da8c1a9071f11762b819fc25679374d48041e24ee251ea1fa7b130db52e8f54
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Söderström, SaraKern, KristineBoström, MagnusGilek, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderström, SaraKern, KristineBoström, MagnusGilek, Michael
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
Interdisciplinary Environmental Review
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 505 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 804 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf