sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
”Ett enormt resursslöseri”: En innehållslig idéanalys av debatten om förslaget att införa betyg från årskurs fyra
Södertörn University, Teacher Education.
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
“A huge waste of resources” : A contextual idea analysis of the debate of the proposal to introduce grades from year four (English)
Abstract [en]

In the school political debate that is conducted in Sweden the question of grading is an ongoing topic of discussion. During the past year there has been a lively discussion about introducing grade from year four as suggested by the right wing parties. The purpose of this study is to set the teaching faculties’ view and arguments in relation to the politicians' opinion in the ongoing debate about the proposal of introducing grades from year four. Furthermore, the aim is to investigate how central the didactic arguments are in relation to other arguments in the current debate. To achieve the purpose of this study, the following questions was created:

  • How do the teaching faculty and the politicians argue around the proposal of introducing grades from year four?
  • Which beliefs about the functions of grades exist among these actors?
  • Which learning models and didactic perspectives exist in the debate and how does these relate to the beliefs about the functions of grades?

This study is based on a qualitative method in terms of a contextual idea analysis. The theoretical basis is composed of theories about the different functions of grades, didactic perspective and learning models. The focus consist of investigating how the teaching faculty and politicians discuss the proposal in different articles. The reason for choosing this focus is to highlight the teaching faculties’ point of view in the debate which commonly is overshadowed by the politicians. The results show that the teaching faculty is critical of the proposal of introducing grades from year four, whereas the opinions among the politicians varies. The main criticism is that the proposal would involve a further waste of the school's already inadequate resources. Further criticism is that grades from year four would not work beneficial to the pupils due to different reasons.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 53 p.
Keyword [en]
Grading, assessment, grade four, school debate, politicians, teaching faculty
Keyword [sv]
Betyg, bedömning, årskurs fyra, skoldebatt, politiker, lärarkår
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-27656OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-27656DiVA: diva2:817606
Subject / course
Education Studies
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-06-08 Created: 2015-06-05 Last updated: 2015-11-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(876 kB)114 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 876 kBChecksum SHA-512
a2e327c76101cca5542798db6af15d4eb75c7dc06f1dfdfd8df5ae2ef57ebf3bef4bc22121b46e85aa3b5cf82fb9beb1c8b5b60efa20e00ee70555df860d1188
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Teacher Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 114 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 418 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf