Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
‘Tolerance' Frame As a Hindrance to Effective Public/Authorities Feedback in Belarus
Södertörn University, Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES), Baltic & East European Graduate School (BEEGS). Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Sociology.
2014 (English)In: RC36 Alienation Theory and Research (host committee): Post-colonized Eastern Europe: Overcoming Alienation and Social Fatigue, 2014Conference paper, Abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The report is going to consider ‘tolerance’ as an ideological frame. A critical assessment will be done of tolerance on the part of Belarusian people.

It is going to be shown that a) tolerance as an invariably beneficent trait of the Belarusian people is quite mistaken, b) that the ‘tolerance’ frame interferes with democratic governance principles as accepted and practiced worldwide, c) that responses to public dissatisfaction (part and parcel of normal governance systems) in Belarus are complicated due to persistence of the ‘tolerance’ frame; and d) that for the more fortunate and sustainable democratic outcomes in Belarus a regular public/authority feedback should be restored by getting rid of ‘tolerance’ as part of the ideological apparatus.

The idea of this paper concerns ‘tolerance’ as it enters democratic governance schemes and might be leading to their malfunction. The word tolerance is widely used in liberal democracies and is ascribed a positive meaning. However, it appears that tolerance is not necessarily a virtue. The word tolerance has negative connotations as it acknowledges a problem. The danger with the ideological frame ‘tolerance’ is that it might enter democratic governance models where it can effectively block public responses to dissatisfaction. This way, the system is incapable of conveying public dissatisfaction, and the stimulus is removed for the authorities to improve their work. This might be evident in Belarus, where people have little opportunity to convey their dissatisfaction, given that they are considered as well as consider themselves ‘tolerant’. In this case, their tolerance, being mere holding on, is a potential volcano.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Keyword [en]
Religion, Belarus, Alienation, Tolerance
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-26758OAI: diva2:799164
XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology, July 13-19, 2014, Yokohama, Japan
Available from: 2015-03-30 Created: 2015-03-30 Last updated: 2015-04-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zakharov, Nikolay
By organisation
Baltic & East European Graduate School (BEEGS)Sociology
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 230 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link