sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Virtual colleagues, virtually colleagues: physicians’ use of Twitter: a population-based observational study
Karolinska Institutet. (Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine)
Karolinska Institutet. (Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine)
Södertörn University, School of Social Sciences, Journalism. (Journalistik)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1428-9477
Karolinska Institutet. (Stockholm Center for Healthcare Ethics, LIME)
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 3, no 7, article id e002988Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective To investigate potential violations of patient confidentiality or other breaches of medical ethics committed by physicians and medical students active on the social networking site Twitter.

Design Population-based cross-sectional observational study.

Setting The social networking site Twitter (Swedish-speaking users, n=298819).

Population Physicians and medical students (Swedish-speaking users, n=237) active on the social networking site Twitter between July 2007 and March 2012.

Main outcome measure Postings that reflect unprofessional behaviour and ethical breaches among physicians and medical students.

Results In all, 237 Twitter accounts were established as held by physicians and medical students and a total of 13 780 tweets were analysed by content. In all, 276 (1.9%) tweets were labelled as ‘unprofessional’. Among these, 26 (0.2%) tweets written by 15 (6.3%) physicians and medical students included information that could violate patient privacy. No information on the personal ID number or names was disclosed, but parts of the patient documentation or otherwise specific indicatory information on patients were found. Unprofessional tweets were more common among users writing under a pseudonym and among medical students.

Conclusions In this study of physicians and medical students on Twitter, we observed potential violations of patient privacy and other breaches of medical ethics. Our findings underline that every physician and medical student has to consider his or her presence on social networking sites. It remains to be investigated if the introduction of social networking site guidelines for medical professionals will improve awareness.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: BMJ House , 2013. Vol. 3, no 7, article id e002988
Keywords [en]
twitter physicians
National Category
Ethics
Research subject
Other research area
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-19466DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002988ISI: 000329805500055Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84883347836OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-19466DiVA, id: diva2:638088
Available from: 2013-07-25 Created: 2013-07-25 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusVirtual Colleagues, virtually colleagues

Authority records

Appelgren, Ester

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Appelgren, Ester
By organisation
Journalism
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 305 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf