sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hen - terrorist eller frihetskämpe?: En retorisk argumentationsanalys av hen-debatten i svensk storstadspress
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

When Fredrik Reinfeldt during the TV4 broadcasting of the Ice hockey World Cup final in 2013 was titled Prime Minister instead of State minister it caused a twitter storm. Denominantions are important to us because they are so closely tied to our identity. We may even get upset on behalf of others. A language reform concerning personal pronouns therefore affect many. The gender- neutral pronoun hen received much media attention in 2012. Emotions ran high among both proponents and opponents who shared their opinions on various forums.

In this study, seven debate articles that appeared in Swedish metropolitan press in 2012 are being analyzed from a rhetorical perspective. The intention is to investigate whether the debate is being conducted around the same topos, if misleading arguments occur, and to understand if proponents and opponents are trying to persuade each other and readers of their opinion. The result shows that the arguments often revolve around the same topos, but rests on such different values ​​that a comprehension between the parties does not seem likely in the current situation. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , p. 51
Keywords [en]
gender-neutral pronoun, hen, topos, gender, child rearing, languange view, misleading argumentation
National Category
Languages and Literature
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-19139OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-19139DiVA, id: diva2:628326
Subject / course
Rhetoric
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2013-06-26 Created: 2013-06-13 Last updated: 2013-06-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(549 kB)945 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 549 kBChecksum SHA-512
d1f9eba9829b405e23337c664fd0ad71ab0293568f09d4dfa0e66a9b5f4f5aef61f0a3196465ea1bed04bb13a1729051f6500a468d67b0b6e59ebff799db7b60
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Culture and Education
Languages and Literature

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 945 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1350 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf