Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Management in Regional Marine Governance?: The Baltic Sea Context
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science. (RISKGOV)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5040-4917
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7215-2623
Department of Political Science, Åbo Akademi, Turku, Finland.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, ISSN 1523-908X, E-ISSN 1522-7200, Vol. 15, no 2, 225-245 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Currently, European marine governance seems to be undergoing significantchanges. From having been based largely on scientific expert knowledge, restricted riskassessments and governmental regulation, we are now witnessing a management turntowards holistic perspectives, the inclusion of stakeholders, adaptive governance, and coproductionof knowledge—the so-called ecosystem approach to management (EAM). Byusing the Baltic Sea as an example of these changes, we have taken a closer look at the2007 Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) of the Helsinki Commission and the recent organizationalchanges within the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).Informed by a Reflexive Governance perspective, the primary objective has been toanalyse the extent to which institutional preconditions for using an EAM exist in thesetwo cases. Our results show that even though the BSAP has been designed with anEAM approach as its core philosophy, existing implementation, financing, monitoring,and enforcement structures make it unlikely that actual management modes will changesignificantly in the near feature. Changes in the ICES have occurred as a result of aninternal restructuring process characterized by integrative and learning elements. It hasbeen shown that adopting a broad social science perspective and a reflexive governanceviewpoint can elucidate how factors such as inadequate institutional change, limitedcooperation over sector borders, and adjustment problems caused by path dependencycan threaten the successful turn towards the EAM in marine governance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 15, no 2, 225-245 p.
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Studies
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-18565DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.766420ISI: 000320080200005ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84878155282OAI: diva2:608672
Available from: 2013-02-28 Created: 2013-02-28 Last updated: 2016-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hassler, BjörnBoström, Magnus
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 161 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link