sh.sePublications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The luggage hypothesis: Comparisons of two phototrophic hosts with nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and implications for analogous life strategies for kleptoplastids/secondary symbiosis in dinoflagellates
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar.
University of Dundee.
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar.
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar.
2009 (English)In: Symbiosis, ISSN 0334-5114, Vol. 49, no 2, 61-70 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Nostoc and Richelia belong to a group of heterocystous cyanobacteria and are unique within this group in forming intracellular symbioses with phototrophic hosts, the angiosperm Gunnera and the diatoms (algae) Rhizosolenia and Hemiaulus, respectively. The function of the cyanobiont is similar in the symbioses, namely providing fixed atmospheric nitrogen to their hosts; also the cyanobionts are contained in a host compartment, the symbiosome. The evolutionary timescale for the cyanobiont-endosymbiosis formation is in both instances about a parts per thousand 90 Ma. However, the potentials for further co-evolution of host and microsymbiont, are different. Nostoc is regarded as preyed upon by its host, while in the Richelia-Rhizosolenia symbiosis example the evolution towards a new type of permanent organelle is possible. It is proposed that symbiosis is ruled by divergent host strategies. In the case of Richelia-Rhizosolenia the evolution of a permanent symbiosis is linked to diatom hosts needing to carry the cyanobiont permanently, as it is not available free-living in the oceans. However, in the case of Nostoc/Gunnera, the host exploits an abundant cyanobacterial species. A model where the relative abundance of microsymbionts determines the nature of the symbiosis comes into view: If environmental ratios of host/microsymbiont are so that hosts are the dominating party, then the host has to carry the microsymbiont as luggage (vertical transmission). Likewise, if the ratio of microsymbiont is higher than host, than the host will prey on the microsymbiont (horizontal transmission). The article also discusses the retention of secondary plastids in dinoflagellates. We show that dinoflagellates are organisms that exemplify both types of strategies that is either preying or harbouring a permanent organelle. The difference from the cyanobacterial example is that only parts of the eukaryotic microsymbionts are kept, usually only the plastid. We emphasize that the dinoflagellates can obtain their plastids from various different organisms. The luggage theory offers an explanation to why some dinoflagellate species contain kleptoplastids, while others have permanent, secondary plastids and some have tertiary plastids.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 49, no 2, 61-70 p.
National Category
Microbiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-17123DOI: 10.1007/s13199-009-0020-3ISI: 000272048600001ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84898827701OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-17123DiVA: diva2:558071
Available from: 2012-10-01 Created: 2012-10-01 Last updated: 2015-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wouters, Johanna
In the same journal
Symbiosis
Microbiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 57 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link