sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
"Jag ser det som ett smörgåsbord": En studie om två olika läs- och skrivutvecklingsmetoder
Södertörn University College, Lärarutbildningen.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
I see it as a ”smorgasbord” : A study of two different development methods of reading and writing (English)
Abstract [en]

In this study I have compared two different development methods of reading and writing. I have done this by interviewing five first grade teachers in elementary schools and it is based on qualitative research interviews. The aim of the study was to immerse myself in which methods these five teachers describe that they have used. They got to describe how they work and how they have tought the students to read and write. 

I have investigated if the teachers think that the computer is a good tool. The investigation also shows if the teachers believe that the students´ writing skills deteriorate if they can use the keyboard instead. 

I came to the conclusion that four of the teachers used Arne Trageton´s method (2005) which means that the students learn how to write by using to computer. One of the teachers mostly used Ingvar Lundberg´s method (2010) in the student´s development of reading and writing, which means that the students learn how to write. All five teachers think that there is no perfect method (instead of development methods of reading and writing). Everyone of them believes that it is up to the teacher to choose the method that every single student will learn best by. When it comes to using the computer they all agree on that the computer is a good complement to teaching. All five teachers don´t think that the students will lose their writing skills by working with the keyboard. They mean that the students still use the pencil often enough in their school work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 42 p.
Keyword [en]
Learning, interaction, IT, development of reading and writing
Keyword [sv]
Lärande, samspel, IT, läs- och skrivutveckling
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-5315OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-5315DiVA: diva2:383557
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-01-10 Created: 2011-01-05 Last updated: 2011-01-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(427 kB)642 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 427 kBChecksum SHA-512
16aeb77b6432951a56e9c929401f52cdfa40a354355ac6e3e94fa4faa55fc60671339de643bac38088a558fb966ec9d114aa2e64d875cc66634d63a3cc7053e0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Lärarutbildningen

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 642 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 490 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf