sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reflektionssamtalets möjligheter och begränsningar: En undersökning om det stöttande reflektionssamtalet som skrivutvecklande metod inom Sfi-undervisning
Södertörn University College, Lärarutbildningen.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Writing is a critical element for many of the second language learners that I’ve encountered in my work as a Swedish teacher. Therefore, on the basis of Jerome Bruners theories of reflec-tion and learning, was the purpose with this study to examine the scaffolded structured reflec-tion conversation as a method for writing development. Bruner says that the knowledge be-comes deeper when we consciously reflect over it (Arfwedson 1992:110 f).

I have used a qualitative method where I let five students write a text in Swedish on the subject "application for internship". After that I held a conversation with each of the pupils. By asking them questions I wanted them to reflect on their writing process, and the language and content in their written texts. After this I let the students revise the texts, with the invita-tion to use the thoughts from the conversation.

By this I wanted to examine to which extent the five reflection conversations led to reflec-tion on the students' own writing, as well as on language and content in the texts. I also wanted to examine how the students changed their texts after the conversations and which factors can be interpreted as being significant for the outcome of the conversations.

The study has shown that the outcome of the scaffolded structured reflection conversa-tions is very much dependent on the students' respective inputs and focus of the talks. The results indicate that a person who enters the conversation with a focus on developing his/her writing in general is generally more inclined to reflect than a student who enters with a strong focus on the individual task. These results also finds support in earlier theories of reflection.

In accordance with previous research, this study also demonstrated that it is essential that the reflection is based on the individuals’ circumstances and experiences. I had before the conversations constructed a manual with questions, which I used in all conversations. The results show that only those students who during the conversation were within what Vygotskij calls the zone of proximal development, through my questions got the scaffolding that they needed to reflect.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 49 p.
Keyword [en]
reflection conversations, reflection, writing development, scaffolding
Keyword [sv]
reflektionssamtal, reflektion, skrivutveckling, stöttning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-3561OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-3561DiVA: diva2:324225
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-06-15 Created: 2010-06-14 Last updated: 2010-06-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(227 kB)245 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 227 kBChecksum SHA-512
adcdde8998035e1713909ef34a114962c68bc24cd4503ec9a3baba6607e387a1ded68d673b8e503b23705fde992aaacc899701df285b904192bfb5b5ad879e2d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Lärarutbildningen

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 245 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 299 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf