sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Företagsrekonstruktion och förmånsrättsreformen: Vad är det som gick snett?
Södertörn University College, School of Business Studies.
2008 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Sweden needs a policy that stimulates economic growth. Year 1996 the Business Reorganization Act (1996:764) came into force. The goal with this law was to savebusiness, make it profitable and avoid unnecessary bankruptcies. Shortly afterwards itturned out that the law had no positive effect. A very few numbers of companies appliedfor reconstruction and the number of applications for bankruptcies continued to increase.In 2004, in order to stabilize the situation and bring about neutrality between twoproceedings, company reorganization and bankruptcy, the government proposed thereform of priority rules. The new proposition replaced the business mortgage. Accordingthe new priority rules the floating charge was limited from 100 per cent to 55 per cent.But the effect of the new reform was negative. This caused intense debates amongpoliticians and economists. The negative effects of the reform weighted more than the positive ones and in 2007 it was proposed to increase the percentage share from 55 percent to 75 percent.

On January 2009 this will be changed to 100 per cent again.Something went wrong. Why do so many companies choose to go into bankruptcy insteadof business reorganizing? Why didn’t the new priority rules work properly?

The focus of this study is to analyze the reasons why the law of business reorganization has so weak effect, why the reform of priority rules has failed.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , 54 p.
Series
Examensarbete
Keyword [sv]
företagsrekonstruktion, förmånsrättsreformen
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-2223OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-2223DiVA: diva2:208357
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok

Supervisors
Available from: 2009-03-20 Created: 2009-03-17 Last updated: 2009-03-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1567 kB)618 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1567 kBChecksum SHA-512
45224b064a490e25890219ace75577752d2a5471a253c1dc5a55ee316915feb2511207b5e83edffe129df3ff6c3ba934c14a1539b9c2ef69b111bfad75266f95
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sternina, Daria
By organisation
School of Business Studies
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 618 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 210 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf