sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Aesthetic perception of urban biodiversity: a review of methodologies and statistical approaches
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science. Södertörn University, Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES), Baltic & East European Graduate School (BEEGS).
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0070-6794
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0260-3978
2025 (English)In: Cogent Social Sciences, E-ISSN 2331-1886, Vol. 11, no 1, article id 2484629Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Understanding the links between biodiversity and human aesthetic perception is vital for designing favourable urban environments and aligning conservation goals with well-being agendas. Despite evidence supporting the preference for beautiful and biodiverse landscapes, inconsistencies exist. This study aims to review the empirical literature on aesthetic perception and biodiversity research in urban settings and identify key methodological challenges in that area of study. The method used is a systematic mapping. The results revealed a lack of a unified methodology for operationalizing the concepts of biodiversity and aesthetic perception, as well as a shortage of standardized, evidence-based statistical procedures. These gaps hinder the systematic analysis of the relationship between biodiversity and perception and contribute to the incompatibility of biodiversity and perception levels. We propose strategies to address these challenges. This review aims to advance the integration of aesthetics and biodiversity science at the methodological level.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025. Vol. 11, no 1, article id 2484629
Keywords [en]
Urban biodiversity, aesthetic perception, preference, methodology, systematic map, Urban Sociology - Urban Studies, Environmental Psychology, Research Methods
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-56952DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2025.2484629ISI: 001461688700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105002308388OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-56952DiVA, id: diva2:1953068
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European StudiesAvailable from: 2025-04-17 Created: 2025-04-17 Last updated: 2025-05-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Zakharova, KseniiaRodela, RominaLehtilä, Kari

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zakharova, KseniiaRodela, RominaLehtilä, Kari
By organisation
Environmental ScienceBaltic & East European Graduate School (BEEGS)
In the same journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf