sh.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Theory of Practical Knowledge and Recognition of Prior Learning
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education, Centre for Studies in Practical Knowledge.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0564-7826
2023 (English)In: Exploring Practical Knowledge: Life-World Studies of Professionals in Education and Research / [ed] Carl Cederberg; Kåre Fuglseth; Edwin van der Zande, Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2023, p. 169-183Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This chapter raises the question how theory of practical knowledge can be applied to contribute to the practice and theory of validation (i.e. recognition of prior learning). The focus of the investigation is on a problem that is at the core of validation: how can assessment for validation be, at the same time, reliable and valid. In contemporary research on validation the trustworthiness of assessment is discussed in terms of validity and reliability, two ideals drawn from the social and natural sciences. Research on the recognition of prior learning suggests that the relation between reliability and validity of assessment tends to be inversely proportional. If validity increases then reliability decreases and vice versa. This leads to a problem in the practice of validation. Why? Because it puts practitioners under pressure of satisfying both ideals at the same time. Practitioners try to increase reliability by formalizing assessment procedures, though formalization tends to render invisible and exclude informal knowledge. Using an example of validation from vocational education this chapter shows how this contradiction can be overcome, or at least be eased up, by seeing the problem from the point of view of the theory of practical knowledge.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2023. p. 169-183
Series
Professional Practice and Education, ISSN 2542-9124 ; 3
National Category
Philosophy Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-51960DOI: 10.1163/9789004547360_011ISBN: 978-90-04-54736-0 (electronic)ISBN: 978-90-04-54735-3 (print)ISBN: 978-90-04-54734-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-51960DiVA, id: diva2:1782170
Available from: 2023-07-12 Created: 2023-07-12 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Ratkić, Adrian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ratkić, Adrian
By organisation
Centre for Studies in Practical Knowledge
PhilosophyEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 83 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf