sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Community perceptions of mangrove ecosystem services and their determinants in the Rufiji Delta, Tanzania
Stockholm University; University of Dar es Salaam, Buyu Campus, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Stockholm University.
University of Dar es Salaam, Buyu Campus, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7552-2431
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 13, no 1, p. 1-23, article id 63Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Understanding how local communities perceive and depend on mangrove ecosystem services (MES) is important for translating and incorporating their benefits, priorities, and preferences into conservation and decision-making processes. We used focus group discussions, key informant interviews, household questionnaires, and direct observations to explore how local communities in the Rufiji Delta perceive a multitude of MES and factors influencing their perceptions. Sixteen MES were identified by the respondents. Provisioning services were the most highly identified services, accounting for 67% of the overall responses, followed by regulating (53%), cultural (45%), and supporting (45%) services. Poles for building, firewood for cooking, coastal protection, and habitats for fisheries were perceived as the most important MES to sustain local livelihoods, although the perceptions differed between sites. Distance from household homes to mangroves and residence time were significant predictors of the local communities’ awareness of all identified MES. Gender of household heads and performance of local management committees also determined the local communities’ awareness of provisioning, regulating, and cultural services. We conclude that perceptions of MES are context-specific and influenced by multiple factors. We believe a deeper understanding of local stakeholders’ preferences for MES can help strengthen the link between local communities and conservation actors and can provide a basis for sustainable management of mangrove forests.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Basel: MDPI, 2021. Vol. 13, no 1, p. 1-23, article id 63
Keywords [en]
Ecosystem services, Livelihoods, Local communities, Mangroves, Rufiji delta, coastal protection, decision analysis, ecosystem service, mangrove, perception, questionnaire survey, residence time, Pwani, Tanzania, Rhizophoraceae
National Category
Environmental Sciences Social and Economic Geography
Research subject
Environmental Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-43790DOI: 10.3390/su13010063ISI: 000606353500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85099220805OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-43790DiVA, id: diva2:1522647
Available from: 2021-01-26 Created: 2021-01-26 Last updated: 2022-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Gullström, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gullström, Martin
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
Sustainability
Environmental SciencesSocial and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 159 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf