sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Marine Spatial Planning and sustainability: Examining the roles of integration - Scale, policies, stakeholders and knowledge
University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal.
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science. Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Zentrum für Material-und Küstenforschung GmbH, Geesthacht, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7773-6070
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science. Södertörn University, Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8536-373X
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Ocean and Coastal Management, ISSN 0964-5691, E-ISSN 1873-524X, Vol. 191, article id 105182Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) has been heralded as the key means of achieving a more integrated approach to marine use across sectors and spatial scales. Achieving greater integration and coherence in MSP governance arrangements is seen as a way to resolve current problems of marine governance (such as fragmentation) and address future resource demands in a sustainable way. However, there is a lack of clarity and consensus in practice regarding sustainability in MSP, both in terms of MSP governance practices and sustainable resource use. For example, how are we to treat the environment in MSP? Should we conceive the environment as just another sector with interests to be negotiated, or as the very boundary condition that limits possibilities for maritime activities and developments? How do we integrate diverse views on this in MSP decision-making? This is but one example of an integration challenge in MSP important for sustainability. There are numerous others. Integration is intimately connected to the ability of MSP to deliver sustainable marine resource use at various levels and scales. The roles of integration are diverse and interconnected, including those that affect social-ecological integration or land-sea interaction, but also aspects of good governance and social sustainability. The latter include inter-sectoral decisionmaking, stakeholder engagement, cross-border interaction and knowledge pluralism. How integration is exercised in these procedural aspects of MSP is likely to substantively affect outcomes both in terms of sustainable blue growth or the ability to deliver an ecosystem-based approach. Integration as a policy and analytical problem to be addressed has also been discussed elsewhere – most saliently in the fields of sustainable development, ICZM, environmental policy integration, planning theory and socio-ecological systems. While there has been some work on integration in MSP, additional insight is needed: to better empirically ground the roles of integration in MSP, to understand the multidimensionality and interdependencies of integration dimensions and to unpack what ‘balance’ might mean for understanding and pursuing sustainability in different MSP contexts. In response, this special issue aims to explore the roles, problems and opportunities of various types of integration in relation to MSP's sustainability ambitions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 191, article id 105182
Keywords [en]
Integrated marine policy, Marine governance, Marine spatial planning
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Studies; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40459DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105182ISI: 000531888600006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85082398988OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-40459DiVA, id: diva2:1421250
Part of project
Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region – Integrating Scales, Sectors and Knowledge, The Foundation for Baltic and East European StudiesTaking Social Sustainability to the Sea: Strengthening the Social Pillar in Marine Spatial, The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies
Funder
Swedish Research Council FormasEU, European Research CouncilThe Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 27/2014_OSSThe Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 46/2018_OSSAvailable from: 2020-04-02 Created: 2020-04-02 Last updated: 2020-07-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Gee, KiraGilek, MichaelSaunders, Fred

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gee, KiraGilek, MichaelSaunders, Fred
By organisation
Environmental ScienceCentre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES)
In the same journal
Ocean and Coastal Management
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 269 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf