sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can tools contribute to integration in MSP?: A comparative review of selected tools and approaches
Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Zentrum, Germany.
Coastal Research and Planning Institute, Lithuania.
Aarhus University, Denmark.
Aarhus University, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Ocean and Coastal Management, ISSN 0964-5691, E-ISSN 1873-524X, Vol. 179, p. 1-11, article id 104834Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The role of tools and approaches is currently much debated in maritime spatial planning (MSP). Past evaluation has mainly concentrated on decision support tools and the tangible outputs these can provide for MSP, but little attention has so far been been given to the soft or indirect benefits tool use can have in MSP. This paper assesses the potential benefits of tool use in the context of four common integration challenges in MSP. Drawing on case study material from the Baltic Sea region, the paper reviews the potential contribution of five selected tools and approaches to multi-level and transboundary, policy and sector, stakeholder and knowledge integration. Specific end points are defined for each integration challenge, including general desired outcomes of integrated MSP processes as a template for assessment. Our review shows that the selected tools play different roles in moving towards the various end points of MSP integration. There is an important difference between the potential of each tool, or its inherent capacity, and how it is applied, e.g. in a participative or non-participative setting. Another lesson is that some integration benefits can be achieved by the tools alone, while others – often secondary benefits - depend on how the outcomes of tool use are taken up by the subsequent MSP process. Although the nature of a tool does restrict its potential contribution to MSP integration challenges, the secondary “soft” benefits that can be achieved through certain styles of application and good links to the MSP process can add important integration benefits up and beyond the tool itself. The results presented here may also be relevant to other types of spatial planning and conservation management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 179, p. 1-11, article id 104834
Keywords [en]
Maritime spatial planning Integration challenges Tools and approaches Direct and indirect benefits
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-38343DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104834Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067180409OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-38343DiVA, id: diva2:1324636
Projects
BaltSpace
Funder
Swedish Research Council FormasBONUS - Science for a better future of the Baltic Sea region, 185Available from: 2019-06-14 Created: 2019-06-14 Last updated: 2019-06-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Can tools contribute to integration in MSP? A comparative review of selected tools and approaches(1070 kB)21 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1070 kBChecksum SHA-512
9d97e9a74ab77794cb56bdaef5ec9f13f7c692e98b4dad9db9d4dc2e14dab041f6a02e472d6330aa71f828108d81a335440880b6e86f4cc16cd1c4426771299d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Hassler, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hassler, Björn
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
Ocean and Coastal Management
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 21 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf