sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Credit stacking in nutrient trading markets for the Baltic Sea
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1653-3437
2017 (English)In: Marine Policy, ISSN 0308-597X, E-ISSN 1872-9460, Vol. 79, p. 1-7Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Heavy loads of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus cause severe damage in many waters in the world. Nutrient trading markets where capped firms can buy and sell nutrient load credits have been established in several countries in order to achieve certain nutrient reduction targets at minimum costs for society. The availability of multifunctional nutrient abatement measures that simultaneously reduce loads of both nutrients, such as wetland construction, raises the issue of credit stacking, i.e. whether a firm constructing the wetland should earn credits for both nutrients. This article examines theoretically and empirically the implications of establishing alternative nutrient trading market designs (markets with and without credit stacking, a market for a bundled payment of nutrients, and separate markets for either nutrient) for total costs and achievement of stipulated nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea. The results show that the total abatement cost of achieving reduction targets of both nutrients is always lowest if a market design with credit stacking is established, that markets without credit stacking result in higher abatement cost and nutrient abatement in excess of the reduction targets, and that none of the single nutrient market systems is able to generate the required abatement of both nutrients. The application to the Baltic Sea shows that the total abatement cost can be 20% higher when credit stacking is not allowed than when it is allowed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 79, p. 1-7
Keywords [en]
Nutrient trading, Credit stacking, Market designs, Costs, Eutrophication, Baltic Sea
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-36587DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.026ISI: 000399849800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85012131870OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-36587DiVA, id: diva2:1258036
Funder
BONUS - Science for a better future of the Baltic Sea regionSwedish Environmental Protection Agency, 15/24Available from: 2018-10-23 Created: 2018-10-23 Last updated: 2018-10-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Elofsson, Katarina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elofsson, Katarina
In the same journal
Marine Policy
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf