sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing conflicting goals in pig farming: farmers’ strategies and perspectives on sustainable pig farming in Sweden
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science. Södertörn University, Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES), Baltic & East European Graduate School (BEEGS).
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.
Örebro University.
2017 (English)In: International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, ISSN 1473-5903, E-ISSN 1747-762X, Vol. 5, no 6, 693-707 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Industrial meat production has several negative environmental effects. Governments’ agricultural policies aim for cost efficiency combined with high environmental and animal welfare, which puts farmers in a difficult situation trying to navigate between sometimes contradictory requirements. This paper studies how Swedish pig farmers resolve or cope with conflicting goals in pig farming. We have analysed the regulations governing EU and Swedish pig farming. We have also interviewed five Swedish pig farmers about their views of the different goals of pig farming and strategies for resolving conflicts between the goals of low environmental impact, high animal welfare and enough profitability to continue farming. The greatest divide was between the conventional farmers, who emphasized natural resource efficiency, and the organic farmers who stressed animal welfare, multifunctionality and ecosystem service delivery. We suggest four strategies to contribute to resolving some of the conflicting goals: improve communication about different types of pig farming; use public procurement as a driver towards more sustainable pork production; work towards improving the Common Agricultural Policy, perhaps by implementing payments for ecosystem services or multifunctionality; and finally, decrease the total production of pork to lower the emissions per land unit.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 5, no 6, 693-707 p.
Keyword [en]
ecosystem services, multifunctional agriculture, strategies for change, Sustainable agriculture
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33781DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2017.1399514Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85033720095OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-33781DiVA: diva2:1161692
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies
Available from: 2017-11-30 Created: 2017-11-30 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Öhlund, ErikaHammer, Monica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öhlund, ErikaHammer, Monica
By organisation
Environmental ScienceBaltic & East European Graduate School (BEEGS)
In the same journal
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf