sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vem bestämmer över vem?: En vetenskaplig essä om makt, delaktighet och etik i rollen som fritidshemslärare.
Södertörn University, Teacher Education.
2017 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Who decides over whom? (English)
Abstract [en]

Abstract

My scientific essay is built from two dilemmas which I have encountered in my role as a leisure time teacher. I have treated these two dilemmas with help from my mentor, classmates and the literature and tried to find new answers and approaches to them. My first dilemma comes from my role as a team leader, the power that I have over my colleges and the conflicts that can arise from my choices in my staff team. My second dilemma is about how one of my colleges handled a situation with a student when that students did not want to go to the music lesson. The dilemma between the pedagogue and the student originated from the pedagogue´s will to adapt the students time in school to the rest of the class even though the student doesn’t have the abilities for it.

      My scientific essay begins with me trying to deal with the dilemmas that I have faced and if whether could have done anything different to achieve a more satisfactory result. Furthermore, I try to understand the conflicts that have emerged in my essay with help from different theoretical perspectives. Firstly, I look at how separation of powers in my dilemmas can be seen from a symmetrical relation between two equal persons. Secondly, with the premise from a concept of participation, I try to discern how positions of power can be expressed in a class of students. Thirdly, with the help of Michel Foucault´s concept of ratified normalization I will try to highlight how a school’s structure still strives to shape the students to fit the template designed by schools rather than allow the students to be themselves and trying to adapt the school around the students. Lastly, I try to focus my dilemmas on utilitarian and discursive ethics. Based on these two types of ethics I develop new approaches that in many ways have changed my thoughts and speculations regarding how an accurate procedure should have been carried out with respect to my dilemmas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , 29 p.
Keyword [sv]
Fritidshem, fritidshemslärare, makt, delaktighet, etik.
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-32544OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-32544DiVA: diva2:1095797
Subject / course
Teaching
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-05-16 Created: 2017-05-16 Last updated: 2017-05-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(580 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 580 kBChecksum SHA-512
49446f0db8cbf6ba813066076f5c16a32a805b463adb95cdb03f72c77a925917f5575f0bd012db4a17755685a24d8faaadcdb0d87f1527de90fe22d62785157b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Teacher Education
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 12 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 66 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf