sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Förhöjd sanning. Skönhet, smink och samhällsordning, 1720-1820
Södertörn University, School of Historical and Contemporary Studies, History of Ideas.
2016 (Swedish)In: Lychnos, ISSN 0076-1648, 35-58 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article on the critique of face painting during the 18th and early 19th century, I argue that face painting was a part of the visualization of gendered social order. I conceive the critique and the growing emphasis on women’s natural ability to please men as a consequence of the growth of sociability. A main point is that the explicit critique of face painting was based on its implicit acceptance, as long as it was contained within younger women of the middling sorts, as well as within the dominant ideal of beauty, the petrarcan tradition of red and white.

I also claim that the ideal of the natural within the critique wasn’t very natural at all, which came from a reluctance to accept real naturalness, represented socially by the peasant classes and esthetically by disease and early aging. Face painting stood in a complex relation with a double physiognomy which explained two different truths: the widespread conception that the face was the window of the soul, and the likewise widespread idea that the hierarchic order of society was legible in the faces and appearances of its different members. Within the ideal of natural beauty face painting thus became a tool for disciplining young women. The new, more heterogenic social life created possibilities for women to take on public roles, which lead to an increased will to discipline them and emphasize their subordinate and complementary position through a strengthened rhetoric of natural beauty.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lärdomhistoriska sällskapet , 2016. 35-58 p.
Keyword [en]
Beauty, face-painting, cosmetics, women, eighteenth century
National Category
History of Ideas
Research subject
Historical Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-32297OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-32297DiVA: diva2:1083825
Projects
SESO: Seeing and enacting social order
Funder
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Available from: 2017-03-22 Created: 2017-03-22 Last updated: 2017-03-22

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Runefelt, Leif
By organisation
History of Ideas
In the same journal
Lychnos
History of Ideas

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf