sh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Virtual colleagues, virtually colleagues: physicians’ use of Twitter: a population-based observational study
Karolinska Institutet. (Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine)
Karolinska Institutet. (Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine)
Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Journalistik. (Journalistik)ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1428-9477
Karolinska Institutet. (Stockholm Center for Healthcare Ethics, LIME)
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2013 (Engelska)Ingår i: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 3, nr 7, artikel-id e002988Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective To investigate potential violations of patient confidentiality or other breaches of medical ethics committed by physicians and medical students active on the social networking site Twitter.

Design Population-based cross-sectional observational study.

Setting The social networking site Twitter (Swedish-speaking users, n=298819).

Population Physicians and medical students (Swedish-speaking users, n=237) active on the social networking site Twitter between July 2007 and March 2012.

Main outcome measure Postings that reflect unprofessional behaviour and ethical breaches among physicians and medical students.

Results In all, 237 Twitter accounts were established as held by physicians and medical students and a total of 13 780 tweets were analysed by content. In all, 276 (1.9%) tweets were labelled as ‘unprofessional’. Among these, 26 (0.2%) tweets written by 15 (6.3%) physicians and medical students included information that could violate patient privacy. No information on the personal ID number or names was disclosed, but parts of the patient documentation or otherwise specific indicatory information on patients were found. Unprofessional tweets were more common among users writing under a pseudonym and among medical students.

Conclusions In this study of physicians and medical students on Twitter, we observed potential violations of patient privacy and other breaches of medical ethics. Our findings underline that every physician and medical student has to consider his or her presence on social networking sites. It remains to be investigated if the introduction of social networking site guidelines for medical professionals will improve awareness.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
London: BMJ House , 2013. Vol. 3, nr 7, artikel-id e002988
Nyckelord [en]
twitter physicians
Nationell ämneskategori
Etik
Forskningsämne
Annat forskningsområde
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-19466DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002988ISI: 000329805500055Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84883347836OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-19466DiVA, id: diva2:638088
Tillgänglig från: 2013-07-25 Skapad: 2013-07-25 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-06Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopusVirtual Colleagues, virtually colleagues

Personposter BETA

Appelgren, Ester

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Appelgren, Ester
Av organisationen
Journalistik
I samma tidskrift
BMJ Open
Etik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 222 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf