sh.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Metaphor Features and the Influence of Individual Differences on the Comprehension of Non-Literary Metaphors
University of Niš, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Serbia.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8188-858X
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education, English language.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0121-4591
2024 (English)In: TEME: Časopis za Društvene Nauke, ISSN 0353-7919, E-ISSN 1820-7804, Vol. 48, no 2, p. 423-443Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Given that the use and comprehension of figurative language is one of the most intriguing abilities of the mind, this study extends the line of research related to the process of understanding figurative language to individual differences. The starting assumption is that individual differences affect our ability to understand figurative language, focusing on fluid and crystallized intelligence. These types of intelligence were measured in relation to the ability t1o understand metaphors, and their influence was investigated indirectly, through tests that reliably examine both types of intelligence. The research investigates non-literary metaphors in the Serbian language, normed according to the following dimensions: metaphoricity, aptness, and familiarity. This study seeks to show whether and to what extent fluid and/or crystallized intelligence influence the process of understanding non-literary metaphors normed according to different features. Through selected verbal and non-verbal tests, Raven’s progressive matrices (Raven, 1938), semantic similarities test (Stamenković, Ichien, & Holyoak, 2019a), as well as a non-literary metaphor comprehension test, it is determined in which way fluid and crystallized intelligence play roles in the process of metaphor comprehension, as well as which possible cognitive mechanism allows us to process metaphors. The results show that the comprehension of non-literary metaphors mostly relies on crystallized intelligence, while fluid intelligence seems to be employed in individual cases, only with some groups of metaphors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Niš , 2024. Vol. 48, no 2, p. 423-443
Keywords [en]
Metaphor comprehension process, Fluid intelligence, Crystallized intelligence, Metaphoricity, Aptness, Familiarity
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-54492DOI: 10.22190/TEME231002024MOAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-54492DiVA, id: diva2:1885816
Available from: 2024-07-25 Created: 2024-07-25 Last updated: 2024-08-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Stamenković, Dušan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Milenković, KatarinaStamenković, Dušan
By organisation
English language
In the same journal
TEME: Časopis za Društvene Nauke
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf