sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Thinking dementia differently: Dialogues between feminist scholarship and dementia studies
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education, Gender Studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5235-6111
2023 (English)In: Critical Dementia Studies: An Introduction / [ed] Richard Ward; Linn J. Sandberg, London: Routledge, 2023, p. 202-216Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter engages in critical dialogues between dementia studies and feminist scholarship. More specifically, the chapter explores how feminist studies can be useful for thinking and rethinking dementia and difference. The chapter engages with two feminist genealogies: feminist difference theory and feminist standpoint theory. Dementia has frequently been conceptualised in terms of negative difference as loss and deterioration, in particular in bio-medical discourse. More recent discourses have in contrast sought to underscore the sameness and normality of people with dementia, but this approach also functions to reinstate people with dementia into cognonormative Western modernist ideals of activity, agency and autonomy. Feminist difference theorists, however, provide ways of thinking affirmative difference. This approach to difference is neither a recourse to pathological difference nor to assimilationist sameness, but enables ways of thinking dementia as lived and embodied difference. The second approach to difference, feminist standpoint theory, concerns the different positionalities of people with dementia. In this argument, people with dementia, in particular those experiencing multiple forms of oppression, are understood as holding epistemic privilege – a particular knowledge of the oppressions of cognitive ableism. The chapter proposes a ‘“demented” standpoint’ as a way of approaching the different and unique knowledge of people with dementia and discusses further how this requires radical rethinking of methodologies in dementia studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Routledge, 2023. p. 202-216
Series
Dementia in Critical Dialogue
National Category
Gender Studies Social Work Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-51343DOI: 10.4324/9781003221982-20ISBN: 9781032118802 (print)ISBN: 9781032118833 (print)ISBN: 9781003221982 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-51343DiVA, id: diva2:1751383
Part of project
Critical dementia studies: alliances, resistances and dialogues, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Funder
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, SAB20-0045Available from: 2023-04-18 Created: 2023-04-18 Last updated: 2023-04-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Sandberg, Linn J.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandberg, Linn J.
By organisation
Gender Studies
Gender StudiesSocial WorkSocial Sciences InterdisciplinaryCultural Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 71 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf