sh.sePublications
4041424344454645 of 46
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
En undersökning av 2003 och 2015 års PISA-studier: En jämförande studie av ord och begrepp ur ett begreppshistoriskt perspektiv som förekommer i PISA-studiernas två olika tider
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education.
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Every third year a PISA study is conducted, through international measurements for member states of the OECD-organization. This aims to measure each country´s pupils by the ages of 15 years old. Its purpose is to examine how each member´s pupils perform in mathematics, reading comprehensions, sciences and problem solving. In this essay we intend to examine how the PISA studies were received as a creation of opinion and self-image.  This research follows up on selected actors in the media debate surrounding PISA as a tool of argument and means of discussion. The natural demarcation is made by actors; mostly from professional teachers, but also journalists, lectures, writers and school experts in the fields. Its purpose is to give a well-balanced and comprehensive picture of the PISA-debates. From a political standpoint the actors represent different positions of the spectrum. The study consists of a total of 10 actors. Between the years of 2004-2005 and 2016-2017 of the PISA 2003 and 2015. This paper will focus on the PISA studies that were done by the years of 2003 and 2015.

By working with different PISA studies with a long span of time between them. This is done as a conscious strategy in favor of the comparative study. In this essay the conceptual changes between these two PISA studies will be examined and studied with a conceptual analysis. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 46
Keywords [en]
Actors, PISA, OECD, Concept analysis, Koselleck, School results, International rankings, PISA-chock, Media debate
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40634OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-40634DiVA, id: diva2:1428564
Subject / course
Civics
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-05-06 Created: 2020-05-06 Last updated: 2020-05-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(454 kB)10 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 454 kBChecksum SHA-512
8d8ab808c2dd15a1f8e550215c127c52658c28a7d5187964a4b488139538e676ff7d60bc7a032ab70250c5de84b4a5a752be0a4223dc35ae377332fb4cf8e10b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Culture and Education
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 10 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
4041424344454645 of 46
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf