sh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Theory of Practical Knowledge and Recognition of Prior Learning
Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och lärande, Centrum för praktisk kunskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0564-7826
2023 (Engelska)Ingår i: Exploring Practical Knowledge: Life-World Studies of Professionals in Education and Research / [ed] Carl Cederberg; Kåre Fuglseth; Edwin van der Zande, Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2023, s. 169-183Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

This chapter raises the question how theory of practical knowledge can be applied to contribute to the practice and theory of validation (i.e. recognition of prior learning). The focus of the investigation is on a problem that is at the core of validation: how can assessment for validation be, at the same time, reliable and valid. In contemporary research on validation the trustworthiness of assessment is discussed in terms of validity and reliability, two ideals drawn from the social and natural sciences. Research on the recognition of prior learning suggests that the relation between reliability and validity of assessment tends to be inversely proportional. If validity increases then reliability decreases and vice versa. This leads to a problem in the practice of validation. Why? Because it puts practitioners under pressure of satisfying both ideals at the same time. Practitioners try to increase reliability by formalizing assessment procedures, though formalization tends to render invisible and exclude informal knowledge. Using an example of validation from vocational education this chapter shows how this contradiction can be overcome, or at least be eased up, by seeing the problem from the point of view of the theory of practical knowledge.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2023. s. 169-183
Serie
Professional Practice and Education, ISSN 2542-9124 ; 3
Nationell ämneskategori
Filosofi Utbildningsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-51960DOI: 10.1163/9789004547360_011ISBN: 978-90-04-54736-0 (digital)ISBN: 978-90-04-54735-3 (tryckt)ISBN: 978-90-04-54734-6 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-51960DiVA, id: diva2:1782170
Tillgänglig från: 2023-07-12 Skapad: 2023-07-12 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-02-18Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Person

Ratkić, Adrian

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Ratkić, Adrian
Av organisationen
Centrum för praktisk kunskap
FilosofiUtbildningsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 84 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf