sh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating quality or lowest price: Consequences for small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement
Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, Nationalekonomi.
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Technology Transfer, ISSN 0892-9912, E-ISSN 1573-7047, Vol. 42, nr 5, s. 1143-1169Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigates the effect of evaluating the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) in public procurement rather than lowest price. According to the European Union (EU), evaluations based on MEAT, rather than lowest price, give an advantage to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in winning public procurement contracts because such firms are viewed as sources of innovation. Thus, MEAT as an evaluation criterion is recommended throughout the EU. Using procurement data from Sweden, I find no significant effect on SME participation in procurement calls for tender as a result of the use of MEAT in firm evaluations. However, large firms significantly increase their participation when MEAT is evaluated. Even more importantly, micro, small and medium-sized firms' probability of winning procurement contracts significantly decreases when MEAT rather than lowest price is used as an evaluative criterion. Thus, evaluation in terms of MEAT increases large firms' bids and success rates; hence, this policy is counterproductive. The reasons SMEs are disadvantaged as a result of evaluations based on MEAT are, however, not examined in this paper and require further research.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017. Vol. 42, nr 5, s. 1143-1169
Emneord [en]
Public procurement; SMEs; Innovation; Quality evaluation; Most economically advantageous tender
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-28621DOI: 10.1007/s10961-016-9477-4ISI: 000410897900008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84963652738OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-28621DiVA, id: diva2:862634
Merknad

Som manuskript i avhandling. As manuscript in dissertation.

Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-10-22 Laget: 2015-10-23 Sist oppdatert: 2018-04-05bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Essays on quality evaluation and bidding behavior in public procurement auctions
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Essays on quality evaluation and bidding behavior in public procurement auctions
2015 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

In this dissertation, I investigate how different aspects of the procurement process and evaluation affect bidding behavior.

In essay 1, we attempt to map public procurements in Sweden by gathering a representative sample of procurements. We find that framework agreements and multiple-contract procurements represent a very large share of total government spending. The total value procured by government authorities, municipalities and counties accounts to 215 BSEK yearly, which we believe is an underestimate due to data issues.

Essay 2 suggests a simple method for of estimating bidding costs in public procurement, and are empirically estimated to be approximately 2 percent of the procurement value using a comprehensive dataset and approximately 0.5 percent for a more homogeneous road re-pavement dataset. Our method provides reasonable estimates with, compared to other methods, relatively low data requirements.

Essay 3 investigates the effect of quality evaluation on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Contrary to common belief, SMEs’ participation does not increase when evaluating quality, and their probability to win procurements decreases compared with that of large firms.

In essay 4, the bidders’ decision to apply for a procurement review “appeal” is investigated. Contrary to procurers’ beliefs, evaluating quality is found not to have any statistically significant effect on the probability of appeals. Instead, I empirically confirm theoretical prediction of the 1st runner-up’s decision to claim the evaluation to be redone, as well as free-riding in appealing.

In essay 5, we test whether spatial econometrics can be used to test for collusion in procurement data. We apply this method on a known cartel and test during and after the period the cartel was active. Our estimates support the proposition that spatial econometrics can be used to test for collusive behavior.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Örebro: Örebro university, 2015. s. 20
Serie
Örebro Studies in Economics, ISSN 1651-8896 ; 29Södertörn doctoral dissertations, ISSN 1652-7399 ; 113
Emneord
public procurement, quality evaluation, bidding behavior, cartels, SMEs, transaction cost, litigation, spatial econometrics
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Nationalekonomi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-28617 (URN)978-91-7529-095-9 (ISBN)
Disputas
2015-11-12, MB503 Södertörns Högskola, Alfred Nobels allé 7, Flemingsberg, 10:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-10-23 Laget: 2015-10-23 Sist oppdatert: 2015-10-23bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Stake, Johan Y.

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Stake, Johan Y.
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Technology Transfer

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 193 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf