sh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Företagsrekonstruktion och förmånsrättsreformen: Vad är det som gick snett?
Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för ekonomi och företagande.
2008 (svensk)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 poäng / 15 hpOppgave
Abstract [en]

Sweden needs a policy that stimulates economic growth. Year 1996 the Business Reorganization Act (1996:764) came into force. The goal with this law was to savebusiness, make it profitable and avoid unnecessary bankruptcies. Shortly afterwards itturned out that the law had no positive effect. A very few numbers of companies appliedfor reconstruction and the number of applications for bankruptcies continued to increase.In 2004, in order to stabilize the situation and bring about neutrality between twoproceedings, company reorganization and bankruptcy, the government proposed thereform of priority rules. The new proposition replaced the business mortgage. Accordingthe new priority rules the floating charge was limited from 100 per cent to 55 per cent.But the effect of the new reform was negative. This caused intense debates amongpoliticians and economists. The negative effects of the reform weighted more than the positive ones and in 2007 it was proposed to increase the percentage share from 55 percent to 75 percent.

On January 2009 this will be changed to 100 per cent again.Something went wrong. Why do so many companies choose to go into bankruptcy insteadof business reorganizing? Why didn’t the new priority rules work properly?

The focus of this study is to analyze the reasons why the law of business reorganization has so weak effect, why the reform of priority rules has failed.

 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2008. , s. 54
Emneord [sv]
företagsrekonstruktion, förmånsrättsreformen
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-2223OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-2223DiVA, id: diva2:208357
Fag / kurs
Business Studies
Presentation
(engelsk)
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-03-20 Laget: 2009-03-17 Sist oppdatert: 2021-07-05bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltekst(1567 kB)917 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 1567 kBChecksum SHA-512
45224b064a490e25890219ace75577752d2a5471a253c1dc5a55ee316915feb2511207b5e83edffe129df3ff6c3ba934c14a1539b9c2ef69b111bfad75266f95
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 917 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 361 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf