sh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Testing the ecosystem service cascade framework and QUICKScan software tool in the context of land use planning in Glenlivet Estate Scotland
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, UK.
Earth Informatics, Alterra, Wageningen-UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6074-4616
Earth Informatics, Alterra, Wageningen-UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-6553-3786
Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för naturvetenskap, miljö och teknik, Miljövetenskap. Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, ISSN 2151-3732, E-ISSN 2151-3740, Vol. 13, nr 2, s. 12-25Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The concept of ecosystem services has been extensively studied in recent decades. Most studies have focused on describing the specific aspects such as production, spatial extent, valuation of services and the trade-off between services. Few studies however assess the practitioners? views on the frameworks, models or tools developed. In this paper, we report on a multi-stakeholder workshop where two tools were tested (i) the ecosystem service cascade framework was tested as a means to frame the issues and (ii) a participatory-spatial modelling method, QUICKScan, was tested as an aid to support discussion over natural resource management and planning in a multi-use landscape. A focused group discussion was utilised to determine stakeholders? views of the cascade framework and pre- and post-workshop questionnaires quantified the stakeholders? views of the QUICKScan method. The stakeholders identified both positive and negative aspects of both tools. The diversity of views expressed were associated with (i) the past experience of the individual with the issues discussed, (ii) the technical aspects of the tools i.e. the ability with GIS and (iii) the level of new shared knowledge they reported acquiring on the day which was related to their initial knowledge of the issue and area studied.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017. Vol. 13, nr 2, s. 12-25
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Miljövetenskapliga studier
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-31888DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2016.1268648Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85024092084OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-31888DiVA, id: diva2:1069295
Prosjekter
Environmental governance in context: a study of process dynamics, contextual features and outcomes in four empirical cases
Forskningsfinansiär
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 192/3.1.1/2013Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-01-27 Laget: 2017-01-27 Sist oppdatert: 2018-04-05bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Rodela, Romina

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Verweij, PeterCarmen, EstherRodela, RominaAndrews, Christopher
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 45 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf