sh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations
Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för genus, kultur och historia, Samtidshistoriska institutet. Stockholm University.
Stockholm University.
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, ISSN 1548-7733, E-ISSN 1548-7733, Vol. 8, nr 1, s. 50-58Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The difficulties nation states face when attempting to use traditional legal means to cope with transnational phenomena such as environmental degradation, international labor conditions, and global trade have created an opportunity for the emergence of new types of regulations. These rules are often issued by organizations that produce voluntary measures such as standards and action plans to influence the behavior of individuals and institutions. These are in many cases meta-organizations that have other organizations rather than individuals as members. They are important links in the process of creating and diffusing dominant definitions in the "ideoscape" of influential policy concepts such as sustainable development. This article explores how two meta-organizations, Fairtrade International (FLO) and Organic Forum, shape the concepts of fair trade and organic food by providing ideas and content to the ideoscape of sustainable development. We argue that this process takes place by governance through bureaucrati-zation in which fair trade and organic food become formalized, precisely defined, and made visible. This in turn determines how-or even if-the social dimension of sustainability can be made into policy. Furthermore, we find explanations in these processes as to why the social dimension of sustainability tends to be the most underdeveloped. We conclude that bureaucratization is also a form of politics, although not one that is as easily recognizable as an open power struggle. © 2012 Casula Vifell & Thedvall.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2012. Vol. 8, nr 1, s. 50-58
Emneord [en]
Bureaucracy, Food industry, Globalization, Organizations, Social conditions, Standardization, Sustainable development, Ena
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-21044Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84862504660OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-21044DiVA, id: diva2:684267
Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-01-07 Laget: 2014-01-07 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-06bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Scopushttp://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol8iss1/1008-036.thedvall.html

Personposter BETA

Casula Vifell, Åsa

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Casula Vifell, Åsa
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 188 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf