sh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biotopskydd av stenmurar: Skäl för dispens
Södertörn University College, School of Life Sciences.
2008 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 points / 15 hpStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Stone walls in agricultural land are incorporated in the general protection of biotopes. They are protected because they provide a habitat for endangered species. Therefore it is illegal to carry out proceedings in an area that is included in the protection of biotopes. In order to do that, exemption is needed which can only be granted if there are special reasons. The essay stipulates what these special reasons are.

In an exemption errand the interest for nature conservation must be weighed against a public or a private interest. Administrators have varying opinions on how the interest for nature conservation, contra individual and public interests shall be evaluated. The interest for nature conservation has a lower value if the wall lacks endangered species or if stone walls are common in the area. But a lower value, in itself, can never be considered as special reasons.

When it comes to a public interest, it must be an important one in order to bring about an exemption. Examples of important public interests are animal and health protection.

Private interests are often constituted by the desire to improve the farming profitability. This is however rarely considered as an “unforeseen situation”, and therefore - according to preparatory work - it is not judged as special reasons.

One conclusion is that the County Administrative Boards need improved guidance. Another conclusion is that exemption shall be used restrictively. Exemptions are not supposed to solve all problems due to protection of stone walls in agricultural land. They ought to be the solution when no other reasonable alternatives can be found.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Huddinge: Institutionen för livsvetenskaper , 2008. , p. 53
Keywords [sv]
Biotopskydd, miljörätt, miljöbalken, stenmur, dispens, särskilda skäl, naturvård, områdesskydd
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-1429OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-1429DiVA, id: diva2:15508
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2008-01-14 Created: 2008-01-14

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(341 kB)4245 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 341 kBChecksum SHA-1
3ff7c3cd7c643e494e1ef8e95e182f40d301763b2558afcf8c04ea3bdf6e80bc32d06e98
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Life Sciences
Law and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4247 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1029 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • harvard-anglia-ruskin-university
  • apa-old-doi-prefix.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-harvard.csl
  • sodertorns-hogskola-oxford.csl
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf