sh.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Publications (10 of 69) Show all publications
Börjeson, N. & Boström, M. (2018). Towards reflexive responsibility in a textile supply chain. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(2), 230-239
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Towards reflexive responsibility in a textile supply chain
2018 (English)In: Business Strategy and the Environment, ISSN 0964-4733, E-ISSN 1099-0836, Vol. 27, no 2, p. 230-239Article in journal (Other academic) Published
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Studies; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33683 (URN)10.1002/bse.2012 (DOI)000424334000005 ()2-s2.0-85041383588 (Scopus ID)
Projects
Chemicals in textiles: Managing environmental and health risks from products with complex product chains
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies
Note

As manuscript in dissertation

Available from: 2017-11-07 Created: 2017-11-07 Last updated: 2018-02-22Bibliographically approved
Rodela, R., Udovč, A. & Boström, M. (2017). Developing Environmental NGO Power for Domestic Battles in a Multilevel Context: Lessons from a Slovenian case. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(3), 244-255
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Developing Environmental NGO Power for Domestic Battles in a Multilevel Context: Lessons from a Slovenian case
2017 (English)In: Environmental Policy and Governance, ISSN 1756-932X, E-ISSN 1756-9338, Vol. 27, no 3, p. 244-255Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Many have discussed the crucial role that environmental nongovernmental organizations (ENGOs) have played in the implementation of nature protection policies across European member states. However, there are important differences in the opportunity structures among new and old member states that influence how ENGOs can act and undertake activities. This article seeks to clarify the role of ENGO capacity building within the context of multilevel environmental governance and focuses on a case in which Slovene ENGOs mobilized against the siting of 80 windmills in a natural area suggested for protection under the EU Birds and Habitats Directive. The dispute involved ENGOs seeking to pursue nature protection objectives against state authorities who prioritized green energy infrastructural development. The article analyses the mobilization strategies pursued and the combination of material, cognitive, social and symbolic resources used. The results suggest that these resources had to be mobilized and organized along both horizontal (domestic) and vertical (international) axes, and that this combination appears key in advancing an environmental protection agenda.

Keywords
ENGOs, nature protection, multilevel, environmental governance, energy, Slovenia
National Category
Environmental Sciences Political Science
Research subject
Environmental Studies; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-31650 (URN)10.1002/eet.1735 (DOI)000406002600005 ()2-s2.0-85006513293 (Scopus ID)192/3.1.1/2013 (Local ID)192/3.1.1/2013 (Archive number)192/3.1.1/2013 (OAI)
Projects
Environmental governance in context: a study of process dynamics, contextual features and outcomes in four empirical cases
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 192/3.1.1/2013
Available from: 2017-01-10 Created: 2017-01-10 Last updated: 2018-09-13Bibliographically approved
Söderström, S., Kern, K., Boström, M. & Gilek, M. (2016). ‘Environmental Governance’ and ‘Ecosystem Management’: Avenues for Synergies between Two Approaches. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 17(1), 1-19
Open this publication in new window or tab >>‘Environmental Governance’ and ‘Ecosystem Management’: Avenues for Synergies between Two Approaches
2016 (English)In: Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, ISSN 1521-0227, E-ISSN 2042-6992, Vol. 17, no 1, p. 1-19Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Based on a literature review of over 160 journal articles and books, this paper examines the ecosystem management and environmental governance approaches, and looks for common topics and integrated research agendas. While scientific articles on environmental governance stem primarily from social science research, the ecosystem management approach is more natural-science-oriented. A review of journal articles from the ISI Web of Knowledge (Web of Science) reveals that the two research communities hardly interact. The paper discusses two thematic linkages between the two approaches: the debates dealing with the scale and level of environmental policy; and the discussions surrounding multi-stakeholder participation. Moreover, the article identifies areas with a high potential for the establishment of common ground, such as the current discussion on science-policy interfaces. We argue for more interaction, claim that the two research approaches can learn from each other, and discuss the potential for the development of interdisciplinary research agendas

Keywords
environmental governance; ecosystem management; scale; level; multi-stakeholder participation; science-policy interface
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-29629 (URN)10.1504/IER.2016.074871 (DOI)
Available from: 2016-03-01 Created: 2016-03-01 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved
Jönsson, A.-M., Boström, M., Dreyer, M. & Söderström, S. (2016). Risk Communication and the Role of the Public: Towards Inclusive Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea? (1ed.). In: Michael Gilek Mikael Karlsson Sebastian Linke Katarzyna Smolarz (Ed.), Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea: (pp. 205-227). Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Risk Communication and the Role of the Public: Towards Inclusive Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea?
2016 (English)In: Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea / [ed] Michael Gilek Mikael Karlsson Sebastian Linke Katarzyna Smolarz, Springer, 2016, 1, p. 205-227Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter focuses on forms of and challenges for risk communication within regional environmental governance, based on an analysis of five environmental risks in the Baltic Sea – marine oil transportation, chemicals, overfishing, eutrophication and alien species. We address questions about how risks are framed and communicated and also analyse the role of communication in the governance process. Our main focus is on risk communication with the public (e.g. existing institutional arrangements and procedures of risk communication), but we also relate this analysis to discussions on communication with a broad range of actors and issues of stakeholder participation and communication. In the study we have identified some examples of relatively well-working risk communication with parts of the organised public in the Baltic Sea region (BSR), such as in fisheries or eutrophication, but also a number of different barriers and obstacles. Our key result from this study is that BSR consists of many national institutions for risk communication, but that there are hardly any centralised institutions for risk communication activities relating to environmental governance in the region. Another key conclusion is that public risk communication in this array of cross-national environmental risks is restricted mainly to (one-way) information. Against this backdrop and from our empirical and theoretical knowledge of risk communication and the role of the public, we finally suggest some ways for improvement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016 Edition: 1
Series
MARE Publication Series, ISSN 2212-6260 ; 10
Keywords
Stakeholder participation, Ecosystem approach to management, Public involvement, News media, Framing
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Studies; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-29784 (URN)10.1007/978-3-319-27006-7_9 (DOI)1748/42/2008 (Local ID)978-3-319-27005-0 (ISBN)1748/42/2008 (Archive number)1748/42/2008 (OAI)
Projects
Environmental Risk Governance of the Baltic Sea (RISKGOV)
Available from: 2016-03-23 Created: 2016-03-23 Last updated: 2017-03-03Bibliographically approved
Boström, M., Grönholm, S. & Hassler, B. (2016). The Ecosystem Approach to Management in Baltic Sea Governance: Towards Increased Reflexivity? (1ed.). In: Michael Gilek, Mikael Karlsson, Sebastian Linke, Katarzyna Smolarz (Ed.), Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea: (pp. 149-172). Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Ecosystem Approach to Management in Baltic Sea Governance: Towards Increased Reflexivity?
2016 (English)In: Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea / [ed] Michael Gilek, Mikael Karlsson, Sebastian Linke, Katarzyna Smolarz, Springer, 2016, 1, p. 149-172Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter analyses the governance structures linked to the marine environment of the Baltic Sea. The purpose is to assess whether current developments of the governance structures have a potential to take into account requirements of an Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM). We use the concept of reflexive governance to understand key components and weaknesses in contemporary governance modes, as well as to elaborate on possible pathways towards a governance mode more aligned with EAM. The reflexive governance framework highlights three elements: (1) acknowledgement of uncertainty and ambiguity; (2) a holistic approach in terms of scales, sectors and actors; and (3) acknowledgement of path dependency and incremental policy-making. Our analysis is based on a comparative case study approach, including analysis of the governance in five environmental risk areas: chemical pollution, overfishing, eutrophication, invasive alien species and pollution from shipping. The chapter highlights an existing governance mode that is ill-equipped to deal with the complexity of environmental problems in a holistic manner, with systematic attention to uncertainty, plurality of values, ambiguity and limited knowledge, while also pointing at important recent cognitive and institutional developments that can favour pathways towards reflexive governance and consequently EAM.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016 Edition: 1
Series
MARE Publication Series, ISSN 2212-6260 ; 10
Keywords
Baltic Sea, Ecosystem approach to management, Holistic approach, Marine governance, Reflexive governance
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Research subject
Environmental Studies; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-29787 (URN)10.1007/978-3-319-27006-7_7 (DOI)1748/42/2008 (Local ID)978-3-319-27005-0 (ISBN)978-3-319-27006-7 (ISBN)1748/42/2008 (Archive number)1748/42/2008 (OAI)
Projects
Environmental Risk Governance of the Baltic Sea (RISKGOV)Cooperating for sustainable regional marine governance (COOP)
Funder
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 08/371EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 217246The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, A032/08
Available from: 2016-03-24 Created: 2016-03-24 Last updated: 2018-01-10Bibliographically approved
Boström, M., Rabe, L. & Rodela, R. (2015). Environmental non-governmental organizations and transnational collaboration: The Baltic Sea and Adriatic-Ionian Sea regions. Environmental Politics, 24(5), 762-787
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Environmental non-governmental organizations and transnational collaboration: The Baltic Sea and Adriatic-Ionian Sea regions
2015 (English)In: Environmental Politics, ISSN 0964-4016, E-ISSN 1743-8934, Vol. 24, no 5, p. 762-787Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous studies of environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGO) have primarily taken place within a nation-state perspective without considering multiple levels of politics and governance. Because environmental problems are usually cross-border phenomena, environmental movements must develop transnational features to play constructive roles in politics and governance. This study contributes to the theorizing and study of transnationalization of ENGOs by illuminating the different regional conditions for this process. The conditions for ENGOs to develop transnational collaboration are explored by comparing ENGOs from six countries in two macro-regions: Sweden, Germany, and Poland in the Baltic Sea region, and Italy, Slovenia, and Croatia in the Adriatic-Ionian Sea region. Grounded in the literatures on social movement theory and ENGO transnationalization, the study identifies how different national, macro-regional, and European institutional structures shape the conditions under which ENGOs develop cross-border collaborations, and demonstrate the importance of long-term and dynamic interplay between processes that occur at the domestic and transnational levels.

Keywords
environmental non-governmental organizations, environmental movement, macro-region, EU, transnational, collaboration, Adriatic Sea, Baltic Sea
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-27158 (URN)10.1080/09644016.2015.1027057 (DOI)000358414000007 ()2-s2.0-84937253302 (Scopus ID)192/3.1.1/2013 (Local ID)192/3.1.1/2013 (Archive number)192/3.1.1/2013 (OAI)
Projects
Conditions for Participatory Environmental Governance in a Regional Context: The Baltic and Adriatic Sea RegionsEnvironmental governance in context: a study of process dynamics, contextual features and outcomes in four empirical cases
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 33044601
Available from: 2015-05-01 Created: 2015-05-01 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved
Boström, M., Gilek, M., Hedenström, E. & Jönsson, A. M. (2015). How to achieve sustainable procurement for “peripheral” products with significant environmental impacts. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 11(1), 21-31
Open this publication in new window or tab >>How to achieve sustainable procurement for “peripheral” products with significant environmental impacts
2015 (English)In: Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, ISSN 1548-7733, E-ISSN 1548-7733, Vol. 11, no 1, p. 21-31Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Departing from previous theoretical and empirical studies on sustainable supply-chain management, we investigate organizational commitment (drivers and motivations) and capabilities (resources, structures, and policy instruments) in sustainable procurement of “noncore” products. By focusing on chemicals in textiles, the article explores the activi-ties of differently sized organizations and discusses the potentials and limitations of sustainable procurement measures. The study is based on a qualitative and comparative approach, with empirical findings from 26 case stud-ies of Swedish public and private procurement organizations. These organizations operate in the sectors of hotels/ conference venues, transport, cinema, interior design, and hospitals/daycare. While this work demonstrates major challenges for buyers to take into account peripheral items in sustainable procurement, it also identifies constructive measures for moving forward. A general sustainability/environmental focus can, as an effect, spill over to areas per-ceived as peripheral. © 2014 Boström et al.

Keywords
Business, Consumer protection, Environmental impact, Resource management, Social responsibility, Standards
National Category
Environmental Sciences Social and Economic Geography
Research subject
Environmental Studies; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-27475 (URN)10.1080/15487733.2015.11908136 (DOI)2-s2.0-84928992337 (Scopus ID)1744/42/2008 (Local ID)1744/42/2008 (Archive number)1744/42/2008 (OAI)
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 1744/42/2008
Available from: 2015-05-18 Created: 2015-05-18 Last updated: 2019-08-29Bibliographically approved
Boström, M., Casual Vifell, Å., Klintman, M., Soneryd, L., Hallström, K. T. & Thedvall, R. (2015). Social sustainability requires social sustainability procedural prerequisites for reaching substantive goals. Nature and Culture, 10(2), 131-156
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social sustainability requires social sustainability procedural prerequisites for reaching substantive goals
Show others...
2015 (English)In: Nature and Culture, ISSN 1558-6073, E-ISSN 1558-5468, Vol. 10, no 2, p. 131-156Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The synergies and trade-offs between the various dimensions of sustainable development are attracting a rising scholarly attention. Departing from the scholarly debate, this article focuses on internal relationships within social sustainability. Our key claim is that it is diffi cult to strengthen substantive social sustainability goals unless there are key elements of social sustainability contained in the very procedures intended to work toward sustainability. Our analysis, informed by an organizing perspective, is based on a set of case studies on multi-stakeholder transnational sustainability projects (sustainability standards). This article explores six challenges related to the achievement of such procedures that can facilitate substantive social sustainability. Three of these concern the formulation of standards and policies, and three the implementation of standards and policies. To achieve substantive social sustainability procedures must be set in motion with abilities to take hold of people's concerns, frames, resources, as well as existing relevant institutions and infrastructures. © Berghahn Journals.

Keywords
Multi-stakeholder, Participation, Procedures, Social sustainability, Standards, Sustainable development
National Category
Environmental Sciences Social and Economic Geography
Research subject
Environmental Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-28184 (URN)10.3167/nc.2015.100201 (DOI)000361515200001 ()2-s2.0-84938060281 (Scopus ID)53/42/2008 (Local ID)53/42/2008 (Archive number)53/42/2008 (OAI)
Projects
The Missing Pillar: Incorporating the Social Dimension in Transnational Sustainability Projects
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas
Available from: 2015-09-03 Created: 2015-09-03 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved
Boström, M., Jönsson, A. M., Lockie, S., Mol, A. P. & Oosterveer, P. (2015). Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 1-7
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: Challenges and opportunities
Show others...
2015 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 107, p. 1-7Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper introduces the Special Volume on sustainable and responsible supply chain governance. As globalized supply chains cross multiple regulatory borders, the firms involved in these chains come under increasing pressure from consumers, NGOs and governments to accept responsibility for social and environmental matters beyond their immediate organizational boundaries. Governance arrangements for global supply chains are therefore increasingly faced with sustainability requirements of production and consumption. Our primary objectives for this introductory paper are to explore the governance challenges that globalized supply chains and networks face in becoming sustainable and responsible, and thence to identify opportunities for promoting sustainable and responsible governance. In doing so, we draw on 16 articles published in this Special Volume of the Journal of Cleaner Production as well as upon the broader sustainable supply chain governance literature. We argue that the border-crossing nature of global supply chains comes with six major challenges (or gaps) in sustainability governance and that firms and others attempt to address these using a range of tools including eco-labels, codes of conduct, auditing procedures, product information systems, procurement guidelines, and eco-branding. However, these tools are not sufficient, by themselves, to bridge the geographical, informational, communication, compliance, power and legitimacy gaps that challenge sustainable global chains. What else is required? The articles in this Special Volume suggest that coalition and institution building on a broader scale is essential through, for example, the development of inclusive multi-stakeholder coalitions; flexibility to adapt global governance arrangements to local social and ecological contexts of production and consumption; supplementing effective monitoring and enforcement mechanisms with education and other programs to build compliance capacity; and integration of reflexive learning to improve governance arrangements over time. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords
CSR, Environment, Global production network, Globalization, Value chain
National Category
Social and Economic Geography Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-28624 (URN)10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.050 (DOI)000363071000001 ()2-s2.0-84942923125 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2015-10-23 Created: 2015-10-23 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved
Boström, M. & Rodela, R. (2014). Developing Capacities for Sustained Transnational Environmental Activism. In: Facing an unequal world: Challenges for global sociology: Book of abstracts. Paper presented at XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology:. Yokohama
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Developing Capacities for Sustained Transnational Environmental Activism
2014 (English)In: Facing an unequal world: Challenges for global sociology: Book of abstracts, Yokohama, 2014Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Most environmental problems are extremely long term and have cross-border implications. For environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) to achieve significant impact on environmental governance cross-border and sustained activities are required. The purpose of the paper is to identify key barriers and possible pathways to develop sustained and transnationalenvironmental activism among ENGOs operating in strikingly different political contexts.  

Our analysis is based on qualitative methodology and empirical analyses of ENGOs in six countries (Sweden, Germany, Poland, Italy, Slovenia and Croatia) and two regional contexts, the Baltic Sea and the Adriatic Sea regions. The study is based on document analyses and semi-structured interviews with representatives from 4-6 key ENGOs in each country. The theoretical framework departs primarily from social movement theory.

The paper reveals intriguing similarities and differences between the countries regarding ENGOs' abilities to develop sustained and cross-border activism. We pay particular attention to differences in opportunity structures for resource mobilization. The last decades, the European Union (EU) has emerged as a key opportunity structure that in various ways facilitate cross-border collaboration and capacity building among ENGOs, particularly in Central and Eastern European (CEE) Countries. However, the EU also considerably shapes the conditions for ENGOs to set independent long-term agendas. With the exception of Germany and Sweden, ENGOs rely heavily on their ability to develop a "project mind-set", which in turn requires fund-raising skills and procedures. Also ENGOs in Germany and Sweden make use of public grants. However, the fact that they historically have been able to mobilize huge number of members/supporters –which is still extremely difficult particularly in post-communist countries - have profound implications for abilities to develop transnational and sustained environmental activism. We discuss the role of (dis)trust (institutional vs. family-based trust), political culture and historical legacies to analyze these remarkably different conditions for resource mobilization.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Yokohama: , 2014
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies; Environmental Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-25728 (URN)1335/42/2010 (Local ID)1335/42/2010 (Archive number)1335/42/2010 (OAI)
Conference
XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology:
Projects
Environmental governance in context: a study of process dynamics, contextual features and outcomes in four empirical cases
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 1335/42/2010Swedish Research Council, 3044601
Available from: 2015-01-07 Created: 2015-01-07 Last updated: 2019-08-29Bibliographically approved
Projects
Environmental Risk Governance of the Baltic Sea (RISKGOV). [A032-2008_OSS]; Södertörn UniversityChemicals in textiles: managing environmental and health risks from products with complex product chains. [A035-2008_OSS]; Södertörn University; Publications
Börjeson, N. (2017). Toxic Textiles: Towards Responsibility in Complex Supply Chains. (Doctoral dissertation). Huddinge: Södertörns högskolaBoström, M., Gilek, M., Hedenström, E. & Jönsson, A. M. (2015). How to achieve sustainable procurement for “peripheral” products with significant environmental impacts. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 11(1), 21-31Boström, M., Börjeson, N., Gilek, M., Jönsson, A. M. & Karlsson, M. (2012). Responsible procurement and complex product chains: the case of chemical risks in textiles. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(1), 95-111Börjeson, N. & Karlsson, M.Green Chemistry, the REACH Regulation and Textile Companies.
Conditions for Participatory Environmental Governance in a Regional Context: The Baltic and Adriatic Sea Regions [A043-2010_OSS]; Södertörn University; Publications
Jonason, P. (2015). Conditions for Participatory Environmental Governance in the Baltic Sea Region: At the intersection of Regionalisation and Europeanisation. In: : . Paper presented at Expert meeting and Workshop on "We the People and the Environment", University of Turin, Italy, January 15, 2015. Jonason, P. (2015). Multidimensional Governance illustrated by Participatory Environmental Governance - The Baltic Sea Region example. In: Alexander Balthasar, Johannes W. Pichler (eds) (Ed.), Multilevel Governance – from local communities to a true European community: Proceedings of the Conference on European Democracy 2014 (EuDEM 2014) 5 and 6 May 2014 (Strasbourg). Wien: Klein PublishingBoström, M. & Rodela, R. (2014). Developing Capacities for Sustained Transnational Environmental Activism. In: Facing an unequal world: Challenges for global sociology: Book of abstracts. Paper presented at XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology:. YokohamaBoström, M., Rabe, L. & Rodela, R. (2013). Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations and Transnational Collaboration in Two Regional Contexts: The Baltic Sea and Adriatic Sea Region. In: : . Paper presented at ESA 11th conference: Crisis, Critique and Change, Torino, August 28-31, 2013.. Blanc-Gonnet Jonason, P. & Calland, R. (2013). Global Climate Finance, Accountable Public Policy: Addressing the Multi-Dimensional Transparency Challenge. The Georgetown Public Policy Review, 18(2), 1-16Bron Jr, M. (2013). Learning processes in environmental NGOs. In: : . Paper presented at International Workshop "Polish Civil Society through Swedish Lenses Mutual Learning in Practice", The Institute of Philosophy and Sociology at the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw Oct. 17, 2013. Bron Jr, M. (2013). Non-formal learning - similar settings, divergent cultures. : A study of two environmental organizations in four countries. In: : . Paper presented at Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE) 25th Annual Meeting. University of Milan, June 27-29, 2013. Schartau, M.-B. & Rodela, R. (2013). Political Culture, one condition for participatory governance. In: On conferensce website: . Paper presented at 25th SASE Annual meeting: States in Crisis, Università degli Studi di Milano, June 27 - 29, Milano, 2013. Schartau, M.-B. (2013). Political Culture, one condition for participatory governance: The case of Poland. In: : . Paper presented at Polish civil society through Swedish Lenses. Mutual learning and practice. Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, October 17, 2013. Jonason, P. (2013). The International Environmental Participatory Governance Legal Framework. In: On conference website: . Paper presented at Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE) 25th Annual Meeting. University of Milan, June 27-29, 2013.
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-7215-2623

Search in DiVA

Show all publications