sh.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Gallardo Fernández, Gloria L.
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 11) Show all publications
Gallardo Fernández, G. L. & Saunders, F. (2018). Commoditization of rural lands in the semi-arid region of Chile—the case of the huentelauquén agricultural community. Agriculture, 8(2), Article ID 26.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Commoditization of rural lands in the semi-arid region of Chile—the case of the huentelauquén agricultural community
2018 (English)In: Agriculture, E-ISSN 2077-0472, Vol. 8, no 2, article id 26Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The agri-pastoralist communities of the semi-arid region of Chile, with their unusual common land ownership, have not escaped economic neo-liberalism. The general pattern of insatiable demand of land for agricultural production, mining, energy generation and real-estate development has become a challenge for these communities. How are these processes affecting the traditional practices of these localized agri-food systems, based on rain-fed-agriculture, pastoralism and the fading practice of transhumance? In this article, we look at how the Huentelauquén Agricultural Community in the Canela Commune has dealt with, reacted to, and been affected by regional economic shifts geared towards market liberalization. In particular, we analyze the structural changes in the community in regard to alienation of the commons and changes in land tenure. Qualitative interviews were conducted with key informants in this setting. To provide a richer contextual setting, this article draws on several other empirically-based works on the commons’ emergence and evolution, land commoditization and local struggles for livelihoods. Our study shows that a community can adopt different strategies when dealing with powerful sectoral development that can involve resistance as well as positioning that seeks to find favorable terms of engagement. Our findings highlight that processes affecting the traditional commons are resulting in the re-appropriation and re-occupation of the land. This is resulting in social differentiation, weakening of the community’s social bonds, depeasantization and further degradation of an already vulnerable ecosystem. In sum, these shifts are posing an existential threat to this form of traditional agri-pastoralism. 

Keywords
Adverse incorporation, Chile, Commons, Development, Dispossession, Enclosures, Neo-liberalism, Transhumance
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-34696 (URN)10.3390/agriculture8020026 (DOI)2-s2.0-85042158801 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2018-03-02 Created: 2018-03-02 Last updated: 2018-03-02Bibliographically approved
Gallardo-Fernández, G. L., Saunders, F. P., Sokolov, T., Börebäck, K., van Laerhoven, F., Kokko, S. & Tuvendal, M. (2017). We adapt … but is it good or bad? Locating the political ecology and social-ecological systems debate in reindeer herding in the Swedish Sub-Arctic: Locating the political ecology and social-ecological systems debate in reindeer herding in the Swedish Sub-Arctic. Journal of political ecology, 24, 667-691
Open this publication in new window or tab >>We adapt … but is it good or bad? Locating the political ecology and social-ecological systems debate in reindeer herding in the Swedish Sub-Arctic: Locating the political ecology and social-ecological systems debate in reindeer herding in the Swedish Sub-Arctic
Show others...
2017 (English)In: Journal of political ecology, ISSN 1073-0451, E-ISSN 1073-0451, Vol. 24, p. 667-691Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Reindeer herding (RDH) is a livelihood strategy deeply connected to Sami cultural tradition. This article explores the implications of two theoretical and methodological approaches for grasping complex socio-environmental relationships of RDH in Subarctic Sweden. Based on joint fieldwork, two teams – one that aligns itself with political ecology (PE) and the other with social-ecological systems (SES) – compared PE and SES approaches of understanding RDH. Our purpose was twofold: 1) to describe the situation of Sami RDH through the lenses of PE and SES, exploring how the two approaches interpret the same empirical data; 2) to present an analytical comparison of the ontological and epistemological assumptions of this work, also inferring different courses of action to instigate change for the sustainability of RDH. Key informants from four sameby in the Kiruna region expressed strong support for the continuation of RDH as a cultural and

economic practice. Concerns about the current situation raised by Sami representatives centered on the cumulative negative impacts on RDH from mining, forestry and tourism. PE and SES researchers offered dissimilar interpretations of the key aspects of the RDH socio-economic situation, namely: the nature and scale of RDH systems; the ubiquitous role of conflict; and conceptualizations of responses to changing socio-environmental conditions. Due to these disparities, PE and SES analyses have radically divergent socio-political implications for what ought to be done to redress the current RDH situation.

Abstract [fr]

L'élevage de rennes (RDH) est une stratégie de subsistance étroitement liée à la tradition culturelle sami. Cet article explore les implications de deux approches théoriques et méthodologiques pour saisir les relations socio-environnementales complexes de RDH dans la Suède Subarctique. Sur la base du travail sur le terrain, deux équipes - une qui s'harmonise avec l'écologie politique (PE) et l'autre avec les systèmes socio-écologiques (SES) - ont comparé les approches PE et SES pour comprendre le RDH. Notre but était double: 1) décrire la situation de Sami RDH à travers les lentilles de PE et SES, en explorant comment les deux approches interprètent les mêmes données empiriques; 2) présenter une comparaison analytique des hypothèses ontologiques et épistémologiques de ce travail, en déduisant également différentes voies d'action pour instaurer un changement pour la durabilité de RDH. Les informateurs clés de quatre sameby dans la région de Kiruna ont fortement soutenu la poursuite de RDH en tant que pratique culturelle et économique. Les préoccupations concernant la situation actuelle soulevée par les représentants de Sami ont été centrées sur les effets négatifs cumulatifs sur le RDH des activités minières, forestières et touristiques. Les chercheurs de PE et de SES ont proposé des interprétations différentes des aspects clés de la situation socioéconomique de RDH: la nature et l'échelle des systèmes RDH; Le rôle omniprésent du conflit; Et les conceptualisations des réponses à l'évolution des conditions socio-environnementales. En raison de ces disparités, les analyses PE et SES ont des implications socio-politiques radicalement divergentes pour ce qui devrait être fait pour remédier à la situation actuelle de RDH.

Abstract [es]

El pastoreo de renos es una estrategia de sustento profundamente arraigada en la tradición cultural del pueblo sami. Este artículo explora las implicancias de dos enfoques teóricos y metodológicos, para comprender las complejas relaciones socio-ambientales de esta actividad socioeconómica en el sub-ártico de Suecia. Basados en un trabajo de campo conjunto, dos equipos - uno que se alinea con la ecología política (PE) y el otro con los sistemas socio-ecológicos (SES) - realizan un estudio comparativo, con el doble propósito de: 1) describir la situación actual del pastoreo de renos, explorando como se interpretan los mismos datos empíricos desde ambos enfoques (PE y SES); 2) presentar una comparación analítica de los supuestos ontológicos y epistemológicos de este trabajo, infiriendo también diferentes cursos de acción para fomentar el cambio hacia un pastoreo de renos más sustentable. Los informantes clave de cuatro comunidades sami de la región de Kiruna expresaron su firme respaldo a la continuación del pastoreo de renos como práctica cultural y económica. Sus preocupaciones sobre la situación actual se centraron en los impactos negativos acumulados de la minería, la silvicultura y el turismo sobre esta actividad socioeconómica ancestral. Los investigadores de PE y SES ofrecieron diferentes interpretaciones de los aspectos clave de la situación del pastoreo de renos; a saber: la naturaleza y la escala del sistema; el papel omnipresente de los conflictos; y las conceptualizaciones de las respuestas a las cambiantes condiciones socio-ambientales. Debido a estas disparidades, los análisis de PE y SES tienen implicaciones sociopolíticas radicalmente divergentes sobre lo que se debería hacer para remediar la actual situación del pastoreo de renos del pueblo sami.

Keywords
Reindeer herding, political ecology, social-ecological systems, resilience, interdisciplinary, ontological assumptions, conflicts/consensus, adaptation, élevage de rennes, écologie politique, systèmes socio-écologiques, résilience, interdisciplinarité, hypothèses ontologiques, conflits/consensus, adaptation, pastoreo de renos, ecología política, sistemas socio-ecológicos, resiliencia, interdisciplinaridad, supuestos ontológicos, conflictos/consenso, adaptación
National Category
Political Science Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-32407 (URN)2-s2.0-85029696137 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Polar Research Secretariat
Available from: 2017-04-17 Created: 2017-04-17 Last updated: 2018-07-06Bibliographically approved
Wallner-Hahn, S., Molander, F., Gallardo, G., Villasante, S., Eklöf, J. S., Jiddawi, N. S. & de la Torre-Castro, M. (2016). Destructive gear use in a tropical fishery: Institutional factors influencing the willingness- and capacity to change. Marine Policy, 72, 199-210
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Destructive gear use in a tropical fishery: Institutional factors influencing the willingness- and capacity to change
Show others...
2016 (English)In: Marine Policy, ISSN 0308-597X, E-ISSN 1872-9460, Vol. 72, p. 199-210Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to empirically assess institutional aspects shaping fishers’ behavior leading to unsustainable resource use, by using the example of destructive drag-net fishing in Zanzibar, Tanzania. A broad institutional approach was used to specifically assess institutional factors influencing the fishers’ reasons for the current use of destructive drag-nets as well as their willingness- and economic capacity to change to less destructive gears. Different regulative, normative, cultural-cognitive and economic factors (tradition, group-belonging, social acceptance, common practice, identity of drag-net users and weak economic capacity) were identified as critical elements influencing the current use of destructive gears, as well as obstructing changes to other gears. Hence, the importance of addressing all of these factors, matching to the different contexts, rather than focusing on fast-moving regulative measures, is emphasized to increase chances of management success. More promising approaches would be resource allocations to more sustainable fishing gears, well-managed gear exchange programs, as well as alterations of slow-moving normative and cultural factors, e.g. awareness raising on the advantages of more sustainable fishing gears, their traditional and cultural values, information on the actual income they generate, as well as education and an exchange of traditional knowledge on how to use them.

Keywords
destructive fishing gear, institutions, small-scale fisheries, gear exchange, fisheries management
National Category
Other Social Sciences Other Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33304 (URN)10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.001 (DOI)000383821500021 ()2-s2.0-84979582241 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilSida - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, 344-2011-5448]
Available from: 2016-08-16 Created: 2017-09-04 Last updated: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Saunders, F. P., Gallardo-Fernández, G. L., Van Tuyen, T., Raemaekers, S., Marciniak, B. & Dıaz Pla, R. (2016). Transformation of small-scale fisheries: critical transdisciplinary challenges and possibilities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20(June), 26-31
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Transformation of small-scale fisheries: critical transdisciplinary challenges and possibilities
Show others...
2016 (English)In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, ISSN 1877-3435, E-ISSN 1877-3443, Vol. 20, no June, p. 26-31Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

One way to confront the global marginalisation of small-scale fisheries (SSF) is to support a sustainable transformation of these coastal communities. In 2014/15, a network of researchers and SSF communities from four countries cooperated in a transdisciplinary research approach to examine governance shifts, fish stock collapses, power structures, future visions and transformation strategies. We combined a political ecology approach with transformation theory to: (i) consider how local context is affected by structural changes and (ii) identify place-based transformational strategies for each case. The global emergence of large-scale fisheries and associated free markets appeared as key factors negatively affecting SSF and coastal sustainability. Through envisioning exercises and context dependent analysis, SSF communities articulated possible and actual strategies towards sustainability that will require ongoing support.

Keywords
transformation, small-scale fisheries, sustainability
National Category
Environmental Sciences Political Science
Research subject
Environmental Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-30084 (URN)10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.005 (DOI)000389513300006 ()2-s2.0-84969903065 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2016-05-31 Created: 2016-05-31 Last updated: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Hauck, M. & Gallardo-Fernández, G. L. (2013). Crises in the South African abalone and Chilean loco fisheries: Shared challenges and prospects. Maritime Studies, 12(1), 1-20, Article ID 3.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Crises in the South African abalone and Chilean loco fisheries: Shared challenges and prospects
2013 (English)In: Maritime Studies, ISSN 1872-7859, E-ISSN 2212-9790, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 1-20, article id 3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Worldwide there is an increasing realisation that there is an inextricable link between the natural and human systems, and there is a need to integrate these into the governance of small-scale fisheries. The critical importance of adopting such an approach is argued in this paper by exploring the challenge of resource over-exploitation in the abalone fishery in South Africa and the loco fishery in Chile, both of which faced unsuccessful fishery closures and the implementation of Territorial Use Rights in Fisheries (TURFs). By exploring similarities and differences in fisheries context and approaches, these case studies highlight that although management strategies have been progressive on paper, they are compromised, to different degrees, by a lack of understanding of the socio-economic and political factors that are influencing the fisheries system. We argue that unless a more integrated approach is adopted to understand the social-ecological system as a whole, few long-term benefits will be secured for both the resources and the livelihoods of fishers.

Keywords
Small-scale fisheries, South Africa, Chile, Loco, Abalone, Governance
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33295 (URN)10.1186/2212-9790-12-3 (DOI)2-s2.0-84876903641 (Scopus ID)
Projects
Beyond private and public property. TURFs as sustainable solution to manage threaten sedentary marine resources. The Chilean case
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 211-2006-2207
Available from: 2017-09-04 Created: 2017-09-04 Last updated: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Aburto, J., Gallardo Fernández, G. L., Stotz, W., Cerda, C., Mondaca-Schachermayer, C. & Vera, K. (2013). Territorial user rights for artisanal fisheries in Chile: intended and unintended outcomes. Ocean and Coastal Management, 71, 284-295
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Territorial user rights for artisanal fisheries in Chile: intended and unintended outcomes
Show others...
2013 (English)In: Ocean and Coastal Management, ISSN 0964-5691, E-ISSN 1873-524X, Vol. 71, p. 284-295Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Granting property property rights in fisheries is assumed to provide incentives for sustainable resource exploitation. These rights might also open other income options for fishers, including some that go beyond the original objectives intended by authorities establishing the right. The opportunity for alternative uses is especially high if the details of these rights are not clearly identified. In Chile, a de novo TURF (Territorial User Rights for Fishery) system, called Management Exploitation Areas for Benthic Resources (Areas de Manejo y Explotacion de Recursos Bentonicos-AMERB) was created to achieve sustainable exploitation of benthic resources. This study compares two small-scale fishing communities in Chile, Guayacan and Huentelauquen, representing two typical contrasting settings, regarding geographical contexts and surroundings, origin, history, location, social embeddedness, main fisheries activities as well as the motivation and the process through which they acquired their AMERB. While in Guayacan the main fishing activity outside the AMERB is the giant squid and finfish fishery, in Huentelauquen the main and traditional activity has been diving for benthic resources. The objectives to acquire their AMERBs were different in both cases. Huentelauquen applied the AMERB for their traditional activity, the fishery of Concholepas concholepas ("loco"), thus in accordance with the official objective of the AMERB. Due to reduced catches of loco, fishers also added the collection of kelps, using their AMERB to control access to the entire coast surrounding their fishing community, beyond the limits of their AMERB. In Guayacan the AMERB, applied for the management of scallops and a species of red algae, began to be used for sea squirt aquaculture. Within the framework of sustainable fisheries implied by the AMERBs, there was in both cases a clear expectation to gain new sources of income. However with time both AMERBs are being used as a tool for territorial exclusion of other fishers beyond the limits of their respective AMERBs. In Huentelauquen fishers mention mostly negative aspects about the performance of their AMERB, given the poor economic results, being unsatisfied with the AMERB system in general, because they feel that the system disrupted their traditional migration along the coast. In Guayacan, fishers mentioned mostly positive aspects for their AMERB, as it was an opportunity to add new activities. Both examples show that rights-based management approaches are very attractive; they could promote new uses or developments, whose sustainability nevertheless needs to be analyzed further. The analyzed case studies show that, contrary to how the system was developed in Chile, a more bottom-up implementation of new management arrangements may make it easier to agree on common objectives, and/or leave more freedom for fishers to adjust and arrange their livelihood. Considering the importance the AMERBs have acquired for fishers, these kinds of systems need flexible regulations in order that fishers can adapt the system to local traditions, uses or needs and also to their learning and adapting capacities.

National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33278 (URN)10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.09.015 (DOI)000314076300030 ()2-s2.0-84870672254 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2013-03-04 Created: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Gallardo Fernández, G. L. & Eva, F. (2012). Küstennahe Commons in Chile: Kompetente Menschen, starke Institutionen, reiche Natur. In: Silke Helfrich and the Heinrich Boell Foundation (Ed.), Commons: Für eine neue Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat (pp. 313-320). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Küstennahe Commons in Chile: Kompetente Menschen, starke Institutionen, reiche Natur
2012 (German)In: Commons: Für eine neue Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat / [ed] Silke Helfrich and the Heinrich Boell Foundation, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2012, p. 313-320Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [de]

Als mit der Einführung der neoliberalen Wirtschaftspolitik in Chile Mitte der 1970er-Jahre die Ausfuhren der chilenischen Meeresschnecke Loco – der auf dem Markt begehrtesten Art – stark anstiegen, waren die Fischer rasch Teil des globalen Marktes geworden. Die »Anlandungen« bzw. Fangmengen der Loco (concholepas concholepas) erreichten rasch Rekordmengen, nur um bald darauf wieder stark einzubrechen – ein Zeichen für die exzessive Ausbeutung der Vorkommen. Daraufhin erließ der Staat Anfang der 1980er-Jahre eine Reihe von Schutzmaßnahmen – saisonale Sperrungen von Fanggebieten, nationale Fangquoten und Fangverbote –, die die Fischer wirtschaftlich schwer trafen. Zehn Jahre später, 1991, wurde schließlich ein neues Fischereigesetz erlassen, mit dem ein System »gebietsbezogener Nutzungsrechte in der Fischerei« (Territorial Use Rights in Fisheries, kurz: TURFs) eingeführt wurde. Die auf sogenannte »Bewirtschaftungszonen« aufgeteilten chilenischen TURFs sind in ein Verwaltungssystem eingebettet, in dem staatliche Regulationen und die von den Fischern selbst festgelegten Regeln zusammenkommen. Durch TURF können die Fischer ausschließliche, nicht übertragbare und erneuerbare Zugangs- und Nutzungsrechte zu bestimmten benthalen (meeresbodennahen) Ressourcen innerhalb des zugewiesenen Areals erhalten. Die Rechte werden ausschließlich an Fischervereinigungen vergeben. Mit einer Größe von 250 bis 600 Hektar liegen die Bewirtschaftungszonen in den für die Fischer reservierten ertragreichsten Fischgründen innerhalb der fünf Seemeilen breiten Küstenzone. Seit 1997 hat die Zahl der TURFs entlang der chilenischen Küste beständig zugenommen, im Jahr 2011 sind über 30.000 Fischer in Bewirtschaftungszonen zusammengeschlossen. Die Fischer landen nahezu den gesamten zum Verzehr bestimmten Fang in Chile an, während hochwertige Arten gewöhnlich in den Export gehen. Die Fischer sind nach sogenannten »Caletas« organisiert, rund 440 kleinen Fischerhäfen, die sich auf privatem, Staats- oder Gemeindeland befinden. In einigen ländlichen Gebieten befinden sich diese Caletas in den Fischerdörfern selbst, in anderen leben die Fischer in einiger Entfernung zu den Häfen. Eine Caleta besteht normalerweise aus einem Pier und einer Bootswerft sowie Hütten oder Schuppen, in denen die Fischer 314 K  a p i t e l   I I I  — Commo n i n g  —  s o z i a l e   I n n o v a t i o n e n  w e l tw e i t übernachten, bzw. den Häusern der Fischer in ihrer Gemeinde. In vielen ländlichen Caletas gibt es keinen Strom, kein fließendes Wasser, keine Kanalisation und auch keine befestigten Straßen. Seit Inkrafttreten des neuen Fischereigesetzes müssen die Fischer an festgelegten Orten fischen, die Küste abzufahren ist nicht mehr erlaubt. Das ist eine Einschränkung, die vielen Fischern gegen den Strich geht. V o  n   R i  v a l i t  ä t   z u   k o  l l e k  t  i  v e m   H a n d e l n Die Beantragung von Fischereirechten für ein Managementgebiet ist müh

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2012
Keywords
Küstennahe commons, Chile, kompetente leiter, starke institutionen
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33290 (URN)978-3-8376-2036-8 (ISBN)
Available from: 2012-05-04 Created: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Gallardo Fernández, G. L., Rodriguez Osuna, A. & Ueyonahara, J. (2012). Monetary stabilisation policies and militarisation: The effects on social and class structure in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (1950-1985). Uppsala: CSD Uppsala
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Monetary stabilisation policies and militarisation: The effects on social and class structure in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (1950-1985)
2012 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This paper analyses the origins of neoliberalism in the Southern Cone; a process that has its origin in the period 1955-65 with the implementation of monetary stabilization policies, followed later by the structural adjustment programs. Both the monetary stabilization and the structural adjustment policies were global macroeconomic mechanisms to restructure the dynamic of capital accumulation and economic power relations. By promoting a freer flow of capital, the economic stabilisation policies facilitated the entry of foreign capital into the economies of the Southern Cone, predisposing the economies of the Southern Cone to the process of internationalisation of production and financial capital, which began to take shape after World War II more rigorously.This process can be understood within a double transformation of capital as 1) the destruction of the domestic bourgeoisie; a process of relative concentration of capital; and 2) the internationalization of finance capital; a process of absolute concentration or centralization of capital. Military rule was a necessary conditions for the project and process of ‘peripheral privatization’ through which capital was accumulated, but not mainly through the productive circuit of capital (M-C-M+). This process thus took place within a global transformation in the process of concentration of capital characterised by a shift in the domain that provided the productive sphere towards the financial and commercial spheres as mean to secure the valorization of capital, requiring the liberalization of international credits and financial markets, thus setting the bases for the expansion of neoliberalism as an accumulation regime, globally and within Latin America. Therefore neoliberalism and globalization found their grounds in Latin America’s ephemeral ‘national developmentalism’ promoted by ECLAC (United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: CSD Uppsala, 2012. p. 27
Keywords
monetary stabilization policies, structural adjustment programs, neoliberalism, Latin America, military coups, accumulation patterns, internationalization of productive and financial capital
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33292 (URN)
Available from: 2017-09-04 Created: 2017-09-04 Last updated: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Gallardo Fernández, G. L. & Eva, F. (2011). New marine commons along the Chilean coast: The Management areas (MAs) of Peñuelas and Chigualoco. Paper presented at 2010 NA-IASC International Association for the Study of the Commons, Arizona State University – Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Tempe. September 30 - October 2. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), 433-458
Open this publication in new window or tab >>New marine commons along the Chilean coast: The Management areas (MAs) of Peñuelas and Chigualoco
2011 (English)In: International Journal of the Commons, ISSN 1875-0281, E-ISSN 1875-0281, Vol. 5, no 2, p. 433-458Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To halt degradation of benthic resources in Chile, management areas (MAs) were set up under the Territorial Use Rights in Fisheries (TURFs) framework in the late 1990s. Integrated into the global market, MAs have since expanded along the Chilean coast, involving thousands of small-scale artisanal fishers. This paper analyses how economic criteria relates to social and ecological performance of Chilean MAs, by applying TURFs, commons and co-management theory to two cases: MAs Peñuelas and Chigualoco. To collect and analyse data Participatory Rural Appraisal tools, interviews and official statistics and reports were used. Our results show that MAs’ economic benefits are connected to fluctuations on the global market. Adapting to changing world market prices then becomes paramount. TURFs’ main goal is ecological conservation, but achieving this seems to depend on meeting fishers’ livelihoods; failure to do so likely results in failure to meet conservation objectives. A serious weakness of the Chilean TURFs system is that it does not pay enough attention to fishers’ livelihoods or to the global market context. Furthermore, there is a strong relationship between good economic benefits and social sustainability. But irrespective of economic performance, fisher organizations have been empowered and gained increased resource control with the TURFs system. At policy level, a differentiated and more flexible system could be more suitable for existing heterogeneous MAs and their particular economic, social and ecological challenges. For improved economic sustainability and resource conservation, a system with multiple-species managing MAs could be promoted as well. Finally, to enhance theory of commons, co-management and TURFs, we argue for greater acknowledgement of TURFs’ social benefits in addition to economic assessments. More attention should also be paid to global market conditions of which MAs are dependent and in which they are embedded: macrostructures that are seldom considered in the analyses.

Keywords
Collective action; commons; economic benefits; empowerment; MAs; management and co-management; organization; PRA; social and ecological sustainability; socio-economic context; TURFs
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33342 (URN)10.18352/ijc.284 (DOI)000208878600014 ()2-s2.0-80053600000 (Scopus ID)
Conference
2010 NA-IASC International Association for the Study of the Commons, Arizona State University – Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Tempe. September 30 - October 2
Projects
Swedish Research Council (VR) financed project (2008–2011) called ‘Sustainable Global Patterns of Production and Consumption
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2012-05-04 Created: 2017-09-08 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved
Gallardo Fernández, G. L. & Friman, E. (2010). The Politicized Nature of Global Trade: The Continuous Commoditization of Land and Marine Resources, and Struggles for Livelihoods in Chile. In: Eva Friman and Gloria L. Gallardo Fernández (Ed.), Politicized Nature: Global Exchange, Resources and Power (pp. 49-71). Uppsala: Centre for Environment and Development Studies (Cemus)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Politicized Nature of Global Trade: The Continuous Commoditization of Land and Marine Resources, and Struggles for Livelihoods in Chile
2010 (English)In: Politicized Nature: Global Exchange, Resources and Power / [ed] Eva Friman and Gloria L. Gallardo Fernández, Uppsala: Centre for Environment and Development Studies (Cemus) , 2010, p. 49-71Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Centre for Environment and Development Studies (Cemus), 2010
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33344 (URN)978-91-633-0201-5 (ISBN)
Available from: 2010-10-12 Created: 2017-09-08 Last updated: 2017-09-08Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications