sh.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (10 of 19) Show all publications
Horbyk, R. (2023). Mediatisation of War and the Military: Current State, Trends, and Challenges in the Field (1ed.). In: Katarzyna Kopecka-Piech; Göran Bolin (Ed.), Contemporary Challenges in Mediatisation Research: (pp. 111-128). London: Routledge
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Mediatisation of War and the Military: Current State, Trends, and Challenges in the Field
2023 (English)In: Contemporary Challenges in Mediatisation Research / [ed] Katarzyna Kopecka-Piech; Göran Bolin, London: Routledge, 2023, 1, p. 111-128Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter presents a comprehensive overview of studies in the subfield of mediatisation of war and military. While its beginnings can be traced back to McLuhan and Baudrillard, the concept of “mediatised war” became standard in the mid-2000s and developed during the 2010s. Key theoretical currents are preoccupied with how the military adapts to transformations of news media and how virality and connectivity challenged the military media management through the diffused war and made it morph into the arrested war. Mediatisation also informs a conceptual backdrop in many empirical war and media studies (often published in Media, War and Conflict). These can be grouped under six categories: (1) representation of war; (2) new versus legacy media in war; (3) new and social media use in war; (4) artistic mediation of war; (5) history of war mediatisation; and (6) digital war, which is also treated as a field of its own (concentrated around the eponymous journal). Despite three key deficits – of conceptual consensus and development, of dialogue with adjacent fields, and of on-the-ground studies, the field appears dynamic and capable of generating highly productive concepts and models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Routledge, 2023 Edition: 1
National Category
Media and Communications
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-51276 (URN)10.4324/9781003324591-10 (DOI)9781003324591 (ISBN)9781032346816 (ISBN)9781032349428 (ISBN)
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 7/2019
Available from: 2023-04-04 Created: 2023-04-04 Last updated: 2023-04-04Bibliographically approved
Horbyk, R., Prymachenko, Y. & Orlova, D. (2023). The transformation of propaganda: The continuities and discontinuities of information operations, from Soviet to Russian active measures. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 5(1), 68-94
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The transformation of propaganda: The continuities and discontinuities of information operations, from Soviet to Russian active measures
2023 (English)In: Nordic Journal of Media Studies, E-ISSN 2003-184X, Vol. 5, no 1, p. 68-94Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article focuses on the transformation of Soviet Cold War propaganda into the contemporary Russian information operations, bringing together two distinct periods characterised with the rise of new and sophisticated techniques. By comparing propaganda instructions in KGB manuals and the practices of the propagandists behind the 2014–2020 Secondary Infektion campaign, we find out what of the “analogue” Cold War propaganda remains in the present-day computational propaganda and how exactly Soviet propaganda techniques evolved into the new mediascape. This highlights both strong continuities of methods and techniques and certain discontinuities. Our analysis also contributes to the understanding of the very concept of propaganda, singling out such aspects as covertness, negativity, and inauthenticity as especially ingrained features of the Russian style of propaganda that are also regrettably often overlooked in generic definitions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nordicom, 2023
Keywords
propaganda, disinformation, active measures, Soviet Union, KGB, Cold War, Russia, Secondary InfektionNordic Journal ofMEDIA STUDIES
National Category
Media Studies
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52535 (URN)10.2478/njms-2023-0005 (DOI)
Available from: 2023-10-24 Created: 2023-10-24 Last updated: 2023-10-24Bibliographically approved
Boyko, K. & Horbyk, R. (2022). A Medium Is Born: Participatory Media and the Rise of Clubhouse in Russia and Ukraine During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Baltic Screen Media Review, 10(1), 8-28
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A Medium Is Born: Participatory Media and the Rise of Clubhouse in Russia and Ukraine During the Covid-19 Pandemic
2022 (English)In: Baltic Screen Media Review, E-ISSN 2346-5522, Vol. 10, no 1, p. 8-28Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Clubhouse is a social network allowing only real-time oral communication. While its 2020 worldwide launch went largely unnoticed in Eastern Europe, it took countries such as Ukraine and Russia by storm in February 2021. Users were enticed by the platform’s exclusivity (invita-tion only and limited to IOS users), unusual format, and compatibility with post-covid social life. For some time, Clubhouse was the dominant theme of discussions on other social media, mainstream news media organizations started launching daily talk shows in the app, and early adopters engaged in a plethora of participatory activities ranging from propagandist broadcasts to 24/7 rooms where bots would recite Russian classical poetry, from fervently seek-ing ways to monetise their participation to creating the somewhat unexpected genre of audial fakes. In this article we intend to analyse the turbulent arrival of the new app in Russia and Ukraine from the perspec-tives of media ecology and media archaeology. Focusing on the app’s mediality and remediation, the social media discourse about it and particular content in some of the notable rooms, we highlight the conjunction of social envi-ronment, the already existing and novel technological affordances, as well as users’ perceptions and expectations in the emergence of a new niche in the ecology of participa-tory media. Based on this, we will also try to outline some possible scenarios for the new platform in Eastern Europe’s dense mediascapes. We argue that the prompt rise of Club-house’s popularity was not thanks to its special authenticity, as some suggest, but rather because of the normalization of group long-distance conversations (e.g., via Zoom), coupled with the intentional monomedia poverty of affordances and clearly delimited boundary between the roles of broadcast-ers and listeners, which was perceived as liberating in a produsage-saturated environment. This actually limits the participatory media potential of content creators and influ-encers, increasing their power and reviving monological models of communication that suggest a passive audience.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Tallinn University, 2022
Keywords
Clubhouse, Russia, Ukraine, covid-19, participatory culture
National Category
Media Studies
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52539 (URN)10.2478/bsmr-2022-0003 (DOI)
Available from: 2023-10-24 Created: 2023-10-24 Last updated: 2023-10-24Bibliographically approved
Horbyk, R. (2022). “The war phone”: mobile communication on the frontline in Eastern Ukraine. Digital War, 3(1-3), 9-24
Open this publication in new window or tab >>“The war phone”: mobile communication on the frontline in Eastern Ukraine
2022 (English)In: Digital War, ISSN 2662-1975, Vol. 3, no 1-3, p. 9-24Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

One of the problems in the growing subfield of mediatization of war is evidence on how exactly civilian communication devices become integrated with warfare. In this article, I focus on patterns of use of mobile phones on the frontline in Eastern Ukraine. Based on qualitative in-depth interviews with Ukrainian servicemen and women, this article presents a typology for the frontline use of mobiles in the spirit of actor–network theory. The omnipresence of mobiles on the battlefield creates a set of unique participatory media practices. A variety of personal purposes, such as private communication and entertainment, are combined in the same device with wiretapping, fire targeting, minefield mapping and combat communication. Mobiles supplant old or unavailable equipment and fill gaps in military infrastructure, becoming weaponized and contributing to the hybridization of the military and the intimate, and of war and peace. These results imply the role of mobiles as a mediated extension of battlefield and question the very definition of what constitutes weapon as tool of combat.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Palgrave Macmillan, 2022
National Category
Communication Studies
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52379 (URN)10.1057/s42984-022-00049-2 (DOI)
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 7/2019
Available from: 2023-09-22 Created: 2023-09-22 Last updated: 2023-09-22Bibliographically approved
Horbyk, R., Löfgren, I., Prymachenko, Y. & Soriano, C. (2021). Fake News As Meta-Mimesis: Imitative Genres and Storytelling in The Philippines, Brazil, Russia And Ukraine. Popular Inquiry: The Journal of Kitsch, Camp and Mass Culture, 1, 30-54
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Fake News As Meta-Mimesis: Imitative Genres and Storytelling in The Philippines, Brazil, Russia And Ukraine
2021 (English)In: Popular Inquiry: The Journal of Kitsch, Camp and Mass Culture, ISSN 2489-6748, Vol. 1, p. 30-54Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We propose to consider “fake news” as a genre with its own conventions and narrative devices dependent on those of mainstream journalism. Departing from genre theory, “culture jamming” practice and Barnhurst and Nerone’s (2002) concept of journalist modernism rooted in Louis Althusser’s idea of form as the principal expression of ideology, we intend to highlight empirically how mainstream media storytelling is hacked, imitated and hijacked by “fake news” in the four countries that are known to have populist leaders and significant circulation of viral disinformation. Focused on empirical cases from Brazil under Bolsonaro, the Philippines under Duterte, Russia under Putin and Ukraine under Zelensky, this article draws significant comparisons between different cultures and traditions of journalist storytelling in the global peripheries concluding that while “fake news” can be subverting mainstream or integrating with it, even the most distant cases share the common basis of meta-mimesis, imitation of other texts. By way of distancing from the overpublicised cases of Donald Trump or Brexit, we also contribute to de-Westernizing media studies.

Keywords
memes, fake news, brazil, ukraine, russia, philippines, genre, culture jamming
National Category
Cultural Studies Communication Studies Media Studies
Research subject
Critical and Cultural Theory; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-48112 (URN)
Available from: 2022-01-14 Created: 2022-01-14 Last updated: 2022-01-17Bibliographically approved
Horbyk, R. (2019). In pursuit of Kairos: Ukrainian journalists between agency and structure during Euromaidan. Baltic Worlds, XII(1), 4-19
Open this publication in new window or tab >>In pursuit of Kairos: Ukrainian journalists between agency and structure during Euromaidan
2019 (English)In: Baltic Worlds, ISSN 2000-2955, E-ISSN 2001-7308, Vol. XII, no 1, p. 4-19Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article, I examine the role of journalists during Euromaidan in November 2013–February 2014. The conceptualization of a specific case of power, the media power (found in works by Bolin, Couldry, Curran, Hjarvard, Mancini, Zelizer, and others) basically oscillates between two extremes – that of regarding the media as heteronomous of the political field and that of arguing that the media increasingly influence other fields through processes of mediatization. What is the role of journalists in power relations? Under which conditions is the power of journalists – and their agency – likely to grow? This article presents the results of a series of interviews with Ukrainian journalists who covered the events of Euromaidan in different capacities. Validated with other evidence, their narratives suggest a positive power dynamic for the Ukrainian journalists during the protest events.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Södertörns högskola, 2019
Keywords
media, power, journalists, mediatization, Euromaidan, Ukraine
National Category
Media and Communications
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-37944 (URN)
Available from: 2019-04-03 Created: 2019-04-03 Last updated: 2020-06-05Bibliographically approved
Horbyk, R. (2019). Review of Myroslav Shkandrij. Ukrainian Nationalism: Politics, Ideology, and Literature, 1929-1956.. East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies, 6(1), 181-184
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Review of Myroslav Shkandrij. Ukrainian Nationalism: Politics, Ideology, and Literature, 1929-1956.
2019 (English)In: East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies, E-ISSN 2292-7956, Vol. 6, no 1, p. 181-184Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 2019
National Category
Cultural Studies
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52736 (URN)10.21226/ewjus483 (DOI)
Note

Book review of Myroslav Shkandrij. Ukrainian Nationalism: Politics, Ideology, and Literature, 1929-1956. Yale UP, 2015.xii, 332 pp.

Available from: 2023-11-20 Created: 2023-11-20 Last updated: 2023-11-20Bibliographically approved
Horbyk, R., Prymachenko, Y. & Yurchuk, Y. (2019). Shared history in shattered spaces: Mediatisation of historical scholarship in Ukraine and broader Eastern Europe. Ideologies and Politics, 3(14), 129-146
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Shared history in shattered spaces: Mediatisation of historical scholarship in Ukraine and broader Eastern Europe
2019 (English)In: Ideologies and Politics, ISSN 2227-6068, Vol. 3, no 14, p. 129-146Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The article focuses on the increasing adoption of media logic and the corresponding change of habitus in the field of academic history in Eastern Europe, with a particular focus on Ukraine. Departing from both mediatisation theory and memory studies, authors consider a range of relevant phenomena from across the region, before considering in more depth the case of LikBez, a grassroot initiative of Ukrainian historians, aimed at debunking historical myths spread both inside and outside Ukraine. The amalgamation of historical knowledge and multiple media platforms to convey it, it is argued, ushers in the era of mediatisation of history. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Foundation for Good Politics, 2019
Keywords
mediatization, Ukraine, Eastern Europe, historiography
National Category
History Media Studies
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies; Historical Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40320 (URN)2-s2.0-85086514289 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2020-03-05 Created: 2020-03-05 Last updated: 2024-05-02Bibliographically approved
Grant, G., Horbyk, R. & Podolian, O. (2017). [A review of] Colby Howard & Ruslan Pukhov (eds), Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine. Second Edition [Review]. Europe-Asia Studies, 69(10), 1678-1680
Open this publication in new window or tab >>[A review of] Colby Howard & Ruslan Pukhov (eds), Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine. Second Edition
2017 (English)In: Europe-Asia Studies, ISSN 0966-8136, E-ISSN 1465-3427, Vol. 69, no 10, p. 1678-1680Article, book review (Other academic) Published
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-34257 (URN)10.1080/09668136.2017.1401823 (DOI)000423279400018 ()
Available from: 2018-01-17 Created: 2018-01-17 Last updated: 2019-10-30Bibliographically approved
Horbyk, R. (2017). Mediated Europes: Discourse and Power in Ukraine, Russia and Poland During Euromaidan. (Doctoral dissertation). Huddinge: Södertörns högskola
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Mediated Europes: Discourse and Power in Ukraine, Russia and Poland During Euromaidan
2017 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This study focuses on mediated representations of Europe during Euromaidan and the subsequent Ukraine–Russia crisis, analysing empirical material from Ukraine, Poland and Russia. The material includes articles from nine newspapers, diverse in terms of political and journalistic orientation, as well as interviews with journalists, foreign policymakers and experts, drawing also on relevant policy documents as well as online and historical sources.

The material is examined from the following vantage points: Michel Foucault’s discursive theory of power, postcolonial theory, Jürgen Habermas’s theory of the public sphere, Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory, Jacques Derrida’s hauntology and Ernesto Laclau’s concept of the empty signifier. The methods of analysis include conceptual history (Reinhart Koselleck), critical linguistics and qualitative discourse analysis (a discourse-historical approach inspired by the Vienna school) and quantitative content analysis (in Klaus Krippendorff’s interpretation).

The national narratives of Europe in Ukraine, Russia and Poland are characterised by a dependence on the West. Historically, these narratives vacillated between idealising admiration, materialist pragmatics and geopolitical demonising. They have been present in each country to some extent, intertwined with their own identification.

These discourses of Europe were rekindled and developed on during Euromaidan (2013–2014). Nine major Ukrainian, Russian and Polish newspapers with diverse orientations struggled to define Europe as a continent, as the EU or as a set of values. Political orientation defined attitude; liberal publications in all three countries focused on the positives whereas conservative and business newspapers were more critical of Europe. There were, however, divergent national patterns. Coverage in Ukraine was positive mostly, in Russia more negative and the Polish perception significantly polarised.

During and after Euromaidan, Ukrainian journalists used their powerful Europe-as-values concept to actively intervene in the political field and promote it in official foreign policy. This was enabled by abandoning journalistic neutrality. By comparison, Russian and Polish journalists were more dependent on the foreign policy narratives dispensed by political elites and more constrained in their social practice.

Abstract [sv]

Denna studie undersöker hur Europa framställs i medier under Euromajdan och den efterföljande ukrainska-ryska krisen genom att analysera empiriskt material från Ukraina, Polen och Ryssland. Materialet omfattar artiklar från nio tidningar med olika politisk och journalistisk orientering samt intervjuer med journalister, diplomater och utrikespolitiska experter. I analysen ingår även relevanta politiska dokument, historiska texter och webbkällor.

Materialet studeras utifrån en kombination av olika teoriperspektiv: Michel Foucaults diskursiva maktteori, postkolonial teori, Jürgen Habermas offentlighetsteori, Pierre Bourdieus fältteori, Jacques Derridas ”hauntology” och Ernesto Laclaus begrepp ”empty signifier”. Analysmetoderna omfattar begreppshistoria (Reinhart Koselleck), kritisk lingvistik samt kvalitativ diskursanalys (diskurshistorisk metod inspirerad av Wienerskolan) och kvantitativ innehållsanalys (i Klaus Krippendorffs tolkning).

Historiskt karakteriseras Europaberättelserna i de tre länderna av det starka beroendet av Västeuropa, vilket reaktivt leder till perioder då Väst förkastas. Berättelserna rör sig mellan tre huvudpoler: idealiserande beundran, materialistisk pragmatism och geopolitisk demonisering. De är inte fast knutna till ett visst land utan har i skiftande grad varit närvarande i dem alla. Dock har svagare aktörer haft en idealiserande tendens eftersom Europa uppfattas som en källa till viktiga teknologier och moderna samhällsfunktioner. Författare i alla tre länderna hade svårigheter att definiera Europas gränser och eftersom detta problem kopplades till ländernas egna nationella identifikation brukar europeiskhet konstrueras som en våg som successivt försvagas ju vidare den sprids mot öster från sitt epicentrum någonstans i Nordvästeuropa.

Dessa berättelser har reaktiverats och vidareutvecklats under 2013–2014. I de analyserade tidningarna uppfattas Europa ofta som en kontinent (främst i Polen) eller identifieras med EU (särskilt i Ryssland och Ukraina), men det är också vanligt att använda Europa som uttryck för en uppsättning värden (mindre vanligt i Polen och mest vanligt i Ukraina). Ideologiskt fokuserar de liberala tidningarna i alla tre länderna positiva värden medan konservativa tidningar och finansblad associerar Europa med negativa vär- den. Bland de positiva värdena dominerar de humanistiska i de ukrainska tidningarna och de rationalistisk-teknokratiska i det ryska urvalet. Den ukrainska pressen har mest positiv bevakning av Europas framgångar medan den ryska pressen innehåller mest av negativ bevakning där Europa ses som fiende och förlorare. Ukrainska och ryska diskurser skiljer sig mycket åt i frågan om det egna landet bör genomföra europeiska reformer (Ukraina) eller ej (Ryssland). Den polska bevakningen polariseras mellan positiva och negativa värden.

Under och efter Euromajdan använde ukrainska journalister det kraftfulla begreppet om värdenas Europa för att intervenera i det politiska fältet och rekontextualisera denna Europaberättelse som den officiella utrikespolitikens berättelse. Detta blev paradoxalt möjligt tack vare den svaga professionaliseringen som tillät journalisterna att tillfälligt överge sin journalistiska neutralitet. I kontrast mot Ukraina begränsade Rysslands starka objektivitetsdiskurs journalisterna i deras sociala och politiska praktik. Där var det snarare den officiella politiska diskursen som övertogs och rekontextualiserades av medierna. Polska journalister var osäkra på sitt eget inflytande och arbetade i en cirkelrörelse där diskurser från mediesfären rekontextualiserades i det politiska fältet och omvänt.

Abstract [uk]

Ця студія присвячена медіярепрезентаціям Европи під час Евромайдану та дальшої українсько-російської кризи, аналізуючи емпіричний матеріял з України, Польщі й Росії. Отой матеріял охоплює статті з дев’яти розмаїтих своєю політичною і журналістською орієнтацією газет, а також інтерв’ю з журналістами, дипломатами та експертами зі зовнішньої політики, користаючи при тім із доречних політичних документів, онлайнових та історичних джерел.

Матеріял розглянуто з перспективи дискурсивної теорії влади Мішеля Фуко, постколоніяльної теорії, теорії громадськости Юрґена Габермаса, теорії полів П’єра Бурдьє, “hauntology” Жака Дерріди та поняття «порожнього означника» Ернеста Лякляу. Методи аналізу охоплюють історію понять (Райнгарт Козелек), критичну лінґвістику та якісний дискурс-аналіз (дискурсивно-історичний підхід підо впливом Віденської школи) і кількісний контент-аналіз (в інтерпретації Клявса Кріппендорфа).

Історично національним наративам Европи у цих трьох країнах притаманна залежність від Заходу, яка також стимулює періоди його відштовхування. Ті наративи вагаються між трьома головними полюсами: захопленого ідеалізму, матеріялістичного прагматизму та геополітичного очорнення. Вони не є винятково притаманними якійсь одній країні і певною мірою присутні в кожній. Проте слабші актори схильні до ідеалізації, бо Европу сприймають за джерело важливого технологічного й соціяльного інструментарію. Авторам в усіх трьох країнах трудно визначити межі Европи, і, тимчасом як ця проблема переплелася була з їхньою власною ідентифікацією, европейськість зазвичай конструйовано на кшталт хвилі, що згасає в міру руху на Схід од епіцентру, розташованого десь ото в Північно-Східній Европі.

Оці дискурси посилилися й розвинулися в 2013 – 2014 рр. В аналізованих газетах Европу асоціюють із цілим континентом (найчастіше в Польщі) або з ЕС (у Росії та в Україні), але розповсюджена й схема, де Европу використано на позначення певного набору вартостей, зрідка в Польщі, але найчастіше в Україні. Ідеологічно ліберальні видання в усіх трьох країнах зосереджені на позитивних вартостях, тоді як консервативні та бізнесові газети схиляються до неґативних. Серед позитивних якостей в українських газетах переважають гуманістичні, тоді як раціонально-технократичні типові для російської вибірки. Українська преса має найбільше позитивного висвітлення успішної Европи, а російські газети мають найбільше з усіх неґативного (Европа як ворог чи невдаха). Українські та російські дискурси найдужче різняться щодо того, чи своя країна мусить здійснювати европейські реформи (Україна) а чи ні (Росія). Польське висвітлення розривається межи позитивними а негативними вартостями.

Під час та після Евромайдану українські журналісти використали впливове поняття Европи яко гуманістичних вартостей, щоб активно втрутитися в політичне поле й реконтекстуалізувати цей наратив Европи як офіційний наратив зовнішньої політики держави. Цьому парадоксально сприяла слабка професіоналізація, що дозволяє іґнорувати вимогу неупереджености. Порівняно з цим, потужний дискурс газетярської об’єктивности в Росії стримує журналістів у репертуарі соціяльної дії, відтак то радше медії реконтекстуалізують офіційний дискурс. Польські ж газетярі, непевні щодо власного впливу, працюють у замкненому колі, де політичне поле реконтекстуалізує наративи медіясфери і навпаки.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Huddinge: Södertörns högskola, 2017. p. 404
Series
Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations, ISSN 1652-7399 ; 149
Keywords
media, discourse, power, postcolonial theory, foreign policy, journalists, politicians, Europe, Ukraine, Russia, Poland, Euromaidan, медії, дискурс, влада, зовнішня політика, журналісти, політики, Европа, Україна, Росія, Евромайдан, medier, diskurs, makt, utrikespolitik, journalister, politiker, Europa, Ukraina, Ryssland, Polen, Euromajdan
National Category
Media Studies Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) History
Research subject
Critical and Cultural Theory; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33726 (URN)978-91-88663-26-9 (ISBN)978-91-88663-27-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-12-15, MB 503, Alfred Nobels allé 7, Huddinge, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies
Available from: 2017-11-24 Created: 2017-11-21 Last updated: 2023-04-04Bibliographically approved
Projects
Connecting soldiers: Media ecologies and materialities on the East Ukrainian frontline (a postdoc project) [7/2019_OSS]; Södertörn University; Publications
Horbyk, R. (2023). Mediatisation of War and the Military: Current State, Trends, and Challenges in the Field (1ed.). In: Katarzyna Kopecka-Piech; Göran Bolin (Ed.), Contemporary Challenges in Mediatisation Research: (pp. 111-128). London: RoutledgeHorbyk, R. (2022). “The war phone”: mobile communication on the frontline in Eastern Ukraine. Digital War, 3(1-3), 9-24
Mediatisation of Propaganda: From Papers to Bots [P22-0798_RJ]; Södertörn University
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-4808-7670

Search in DiVA

Show all publications