sh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
Länk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Publikationer (10 of 25) Visa alla publikationer
Jennische, U. & Sörbom, A. (2023). Governing anticipation: UNESCO making humankind futures literate. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 12(1)
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Governing anticipation: UNESCO making humankind futures literate
2023 (Engelska)Ingår i: Journal of Organizational Ethnography, ISSN 2046-6749, E-ISSN 2046-6757, Vol. 12, nr 1Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose This paper explores practices of foresight within the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) program Futures Literacy, as a form of transnational governmentality-founded on the interests of "using the future" by "emancipating" the minds of humanity. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on ethnographic material gathered over five years within the industry of futures consultancy, including UNESCO and its network of self-recognized futurists. The material consists of written sources, participant observation in on-site and digital events and workshops, and interviews. Findings Building on Foucault's (1991) concept of governmentality, which refers to the governing of governing and how subjects politically come into being, this paper critically examines the UNESCO Futures Literacy program by answering questions on ontology, deontology, technology and utopia. It shows how the underlying rationale of the Futures Literacy program departs from an ontological premise of anticipation as a fundamental capacity of biological life, constituting an ethical substance that can be worked on and self-controlled. This rationale speaks to the mandate of UNESCO, to foster peace in our minds, but also to the governing of governing at the individual level. Originality/value In the intersection between the growing literature on anticipation and research concerning governmentality the paper adds ethnographically based knowledge to the field of transnational governance. Earlier ethnographic studies of UNESCO have mostly focused upon its role for cultural heritage, or more broadly neoliberal forms of governing.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2023
Nationell ämneskategori
Pedagogiskt arbete Sociologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-50010 (URN)10.1108/JOE-10-2021-0055 (DOI)000815260500001 ()2-s2.0-85132899526 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, NHS14-2044:1
Tillgänglig från: 2022-10-03 Skapad: 2022-10-03 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-06-13Bibliografiskt granskad
Sörbom, A. & Jezierska, K. (2023). Social capital and polarization: The case of Polish think tanks. Journal of Civil Society, 19(4), 347-365
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Social capital and polarization: The case of Polish think tanks
2023 (Engelska)Ingår i: Journal of Civil Society, ISSN 1744-8689, E-ISSN 1744-8697, Vol. 19, nr 4, s. 347-365Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article, we study polarization within civil society. While earlier research on civil society has shown that civil society organizations can be divisive, research on polarization has only paid scant attention to the role of civil society. We bring these two aspects of the literature together to develop a framework for analyzing social capital in a polarized context. The framework helps identify practices that organizations may engage in when shaping social capital and working with others: facilitating the flow of information; providing credentials for actors; influencing agents; and reinforcing identity and recognition. Importantly, while originally developed for a fundamentally positive analysis of the mechanics of social capital, this framework includes inverted practices. In our analysis, we observe a bifurcation of actions depending on what role they play in the polarization dynamic - integrating relations within the poles or separating relations between the poles. In this sense, social capital contributes to intensified polarization. Empirically, the article is based on a dataset of 30 interviews with 24 policy-oriented civil society organizations (CSOs), here termed think tanks, in Poland.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Routledge, 2023
Nyckelord
Civil society organizations, think tanks, polarization, social capital, Poland
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi
Forskningsämne
Östersjö- och Östeuropaforskning
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52278 (URN)10.1080/17448689.2023.2242517 (DOI)001050478200001 ()2-s2.0-85168349159 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Östersjöstiftelsen, 6/2019
Tillgänglig från: 2023-09-04 Skapad: 2023-09-04 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-11-24Bibliografiskt granskad
Gerhardt, K., Wolrath Söderberg, M., Lindblad, I., Diderichsen, Ö., Gullström, M., Dahlin, M., . . . Gradén, M. (2022). Nog nu, politiker – ta klimatkrisen på allvar. Aftonbladet (2022-08-25)
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Nog nu, politiker – ta klimatkrisen på allvar
Visa övriga...
2022 (Svenska)Ingår i: Aftonbladet, nr 2022-08-25Artikel i tidskrift, Dagstidning (Övrig (populärvetenskap, debatt, mm)) Published
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Aftonbladet Hierta, 2022
Nationell ämneskategori
Annan samhällsvetenskap Miljövetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-49755 (URN)
Anmärkning

Debattartikel från 1944 svenska forskare och anställda i forskarvärlden.

Tillgänglig från: 2022-08-26 Skapad: 2022-08-26 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-10-06Bibliografiskt granskad
Mellquist, J. & Sörbom, A. (2022). Policy professionals in civil society organizations: Organizational hypocrisy and the myth of member centrality. Sociologisk forskning, 59(4), 363-386
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Policy professionals in civil society organizations: Organizational hypocrisy and the myth of member centrality
2022 (Engelska)Ingår i: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, E-ISSN 2002-066X, Vol. 59, nr 4, s. 363-386Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Drawing on 24 interviews with policy professionals in 10 Swedish member-based civil society organizations (CSOs), and observations of policy professionals in three of these, we investigate CSOs from the perspective of their policy teams. This paper theoretically addresses how policy professionals relate to the members in whose name they work. This article extends the literature on civil society professionalization by conceptualizing the conflicts pertaining to policy professionals’ work in CSOs and ways of managing these conflicts. We argue that, ordinarily, CSO policy professionals working to influence public policy respond to conflicting logics and myth-like institutional demands for strong and direct influence of member interests by maintaining face and investing in the myth of member centrality. Based on how policy professionals address these issues, we suggest that organizations respond to conflicting institutional pressures and myths via decoupling strategies, discreetly avoiding member concerns while investing in the membership myth, ultimately fostering organizational hypocrisy. Conceptually, the paper contributes by connecting the literatures of civil society professionalization and new institutional theory to the burgeoning literature on policy professionals.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Sveriges Sociologförbund, 2022
Nyckelord
civil society, policy professionals, member, myth, organizational hypocrisy
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi (exklusive socialt arbete, socialpsykologi och socialantropologi)
Forskningsämne
Politik, ekonomi och samhällets organisering
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-50378 (URN)10.37062/sf.59.24464 (DOI)000959363400002 ()2-s2.0-85151496274 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Östersjöstiftelsen, 2/2016
Anmärkning

As manuscript in dissertation with title:Policy professionals in civil society organizations: The myth of active members and organizational hypocrisy

Tillgänglig från: 2022-12-15 Skapad: 2022-12-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-05-12Bibliografiskt granskad
Wennerhag, M., Kravchenko, Z. & Sörbom, A. (2022). Politikens resurser – Medborgarnas syn på ekonomiskt stöd till politiska partier, civilsamhället och andra politiska aktörer. In: Ulrika Andersson; Henrik Oscarsson; Björn Rönnerstrand; Nora (Ed.), Du sköra nya värld: SOM-undersökningen 2021 (pp. 481-496). Göteborg: SOM-institutet
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Politikens resurser – Medborgarnas syn på ekonomiskt stöd till politiska partier, civilsamhället och andra politiska aktörer
2022 (Svenska)Ingår i: Du sköra nya värld: SOM-undersökningen 2021 / [ed] Ulrika Andersson; Henrik Oscarsson; Björn Rönnerstrand; Nora, Göteborg: SOM-institutet , 2022, s. 481-496Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [sv]

Ekonomiskt stöd från det offentliga är i dag en central intäkt för såväl politiska partier som andra politiska aktörer. Sedan 2014 ska dessutom staten tillse att medborgarna har insyn i de politiska partiernas finansiering. Vad anser då medborgarna om det offentliga stödet till politiska aktörer och statens reglering av donationer till politiska partier – och på vilka sätt finansierar medborgarna själva olika politiska aktörer? Våra resultat visar på ett starkt stöd för regleringen av donationer till politiska partier och det offentliga stödet till ideella organisationer. Däremot är opinionen kring statens partistöd splittrad. Resultaten om medborgarnas egna donationer till politiska aktörer visar att drygt hälften skänkt till socialt och humanitärt inriktade organisationer och var fjärde till mer politiska organisationer i det civila samhället, men bara en av tjugo till ett politiskt parti.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Göteborg: SOM-institutet, 2022
Serie
SOM-rapport, ISSN 2004-5204 ; 81
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi (exklusive socialt arbete, socialpsykologi och socialantropologi)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-50589 (URN)9789189673526 (ISBN)
Projekt
Politikens resurser: Forskningsinitierande projekt om betydelsen av ekonomiska resurser för politisk organisering
Forskningsfinansiär
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, F18-1304:1
Tillgänglig från: 2023-01-10 Skapad: 2023-01-10 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-05-16Bibliografiskt granskad
Sörbom, A. & Jezierska, K. (2021). Bridging or Bonding?: Think Tanks in a Polarized Context. In: Swedish Political Science Association Annual Conference: . Paper presented at Swedish Political Science Association Annual Conference, Mittuniversitetet, 29 september - 1 october 2021.
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Bridging or Bonding?: Think Tanks in a Polarized Context
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Swedish Political Science Association Annual Conference, 2021Konferensbidrag, Publicerat paper (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Social capital is still often presumed as having positive consequences for societies and communities, less benign aspects are frequently overlooked. Nevertheless, scholarship distinguishes between bridging and bonding social capital to mark that social ties might have very different effects. In this paper, we study the “darker sides” of social capital, arguing that to understand the mechanisms that may propel benign and less benign formations of social capital we need to analyze these variations in context. We focus on think tanks, i.e., policy advice institutions, who are often described as organizations bridging various social fields and brokering contacts between various individuals. We argue, however, that a sharply polarized context turns think tanks to bonding, rather than bridging institutions. Our data consists of 40 interviews with representatives from Polish think tanks, collected in two waves (in 2013 and in 2020/2021), which allows us to trace changes over time. Since the radical right wing Law and Justice came to power in 2015, Polish politics and society are deeply polarized along the axis of the socio-cultural dimension (for or against liberal democracy). The analysis indicates that the networks Polish think tanks use for their activities have transformed from bridging between various groups of organizations, to bonding between similar types of organizations.

Nyckelord
Think tank Polarization Social Capital Poland
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi
Forskningsämne
Politik, ekonomi och samhällets organisering
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-47804 (URN)
Konferens
Swedish Political Science Association Annual Conference, Mittuniversitetet, 29 september - 1 october 2021
Forskningsfinansiär
Östersjöstiftelsen, 6-19
Tillgänglig från: 2021-12-13 Skapad: 2021-12-13 Senast uppdaterad: 2021-12-13Bibliografiskt granskad
Garsten, C. & Sörbom, A. (2021). Discretionary Governance: Selection, Secrecy, and Status within the World Economic Forum. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 27(4), 540-560
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Discretionary Governance: Selection, Secrecy, and Status within the World Economic Forum
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, ISSN 1075-2846, E-ISSN 1942-6720, Vol. 27, nr 4, s. 540-560Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Built on the exclusive funding of 1ooo large transnational corporations, the World Economic Forum is a not-for-profit Swiss foundation, aiming to shape the direction of globalization. Its events are characterized by low degrees of formality and transparency. Research on what this organization does is scarce. This article suggests the term discretionary governance to capture the precarious, yet existing, social order that the organization shapes. By discretionary governance, we mean a set of discreet practices based on the organization's judgement in ways that escape established democratic controls. Drawing on ethnographic data the paper demonstrates how selection, secrecy, and status form key components of this tenuous ordering. Selection processes and secrecy contribute to status elevation of the individuals and organizations chosen to participate. Upon them and the organization itself is bestowed a symbolic capital that is practical and possibly profitable in the world of global governance.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Brill Academic Publishers, 2021
Nyckelord
discretionary governance, symbolic capital, status, secrecy, selection
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-47989 (URN)10.1163/19426720-02704006 (DOI)000733604400004 ()2-s2.0-85122404739 (Scopus ID)
Tillgänglig från: 2022-01-10 Skapad: 2022-01-10 Senast uppdaterad: 2022-01-25Bibliografiskt granskad
Garsten, C. & Sörbom, A. (2021). Future by Design: Seductive Technologies of Anticipation within the Future Industry. In: Sandra Kemp; Jenny Andersson (Ed.), Futures: (pp. 501-513). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Future by Design: Seductive Technologies of Anticipation within the Future Industry
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Futures / [ed] Sandra Kemp; Jenny Andersson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, s. 501-513Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

This chapter critiques the anticipatory practices of contemporary organizations, such as think tanks and management consultancies, which offer methods and forecasts about possible and desirable futures. These organizations, the chapter argues, contribute to creating a sense of urgency with respect to the future, capitalizing on the perceived need among decision makers to grasp contemporary events, and provide tools and content by which the future can be designed. It argues that future forecast scenarios assist in the creation of a particular type of authority: one geared to the contemporary global situation and to an increasingly complex system of global governance. The chapter interrogates this particular type of authority to argue it is not singular and dominant, but instead comprises the varying interests of many different actors and is underscored by rational process, which offers the possibility of a wider shared understanding

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021
Nyckelord
future industry, modernity, design, individualization, rationalization, agency, irreversibility, evolution, disruption, artefacts
Nationell ämneskategori
Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-52556 (URN)10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198806820.013.29 (DOI)9780198806820 (ISBN)9780191898358 (ISBN)
Tillgänglig från: 2023-10-25 Skapad: 2023-10-25 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-10-25Bibliografiskt granskad
Jezierska, K. & Sörbom, A. (2021). Proximity and distance: Think tanks handling the independence paradox. Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 34(2), 395-411
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Proximity and distance: Think tanks handling the independence paradox
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, ISSN 0952-1895, E-ISSN 1468-0491, Vol. 34, nr 2, s. 395-411Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

The credibility of think tanks is grounded in their image as independent experts. In order to gain authority to act, think tanks must be seen as independent, but in order to exert influence and gain funding, think tanks are forced to compromise this independent image. We focus on how think tanks handle this independence paradox. How do think tanks use different resources to construct an independent image? The aim of the article is conceptual, as we develop a theoretical model of the independence paradox. This conceptual work is based on empirical analysis of attempts by think tanks in Poland and Sweden to create independence while maintaining influence. The two desirables central for think tanks, independence and influence, force them to make strategic choices about their relations with various actors. We conclude that the processes of keeping distance and arranging proximity are at the core of the independence paradox.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Wiley-Blackwell, 2021
Nyckelord
Think tank independence, Poland, Sweden, Distance, Proximity
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi
Forskningsämne
Östersjö- och Östeuropaforskning
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40929 (URN)10.1111/gove.12503 (DOI)000536719000001 ()2-s2.0-85085709558 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Östersjöstiftelsen, 6/2019Östersjöstiftelsen, 2/2016
Tillgänglig från: 2020-06-11 Skapad: 2020-06-11 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-07-11Bibliografiskt granskad
Jezierska, K., Krizsan, A. & Sörbom, A. (2021). Think Tanks In De-Democratizing Contexts: A Framework For Analysis. In: Workshop on Policy Advice in De-democratizing and Undemocratic Contexts: . Paper presented at Workshop on Policy Advice in De-democratizing and Undemocratic Contexts Hjortviken, Gothenburg 18-19 November 2021.
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Think Tanks In De-Democratizing Contexts: A Framework For Analysis
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Workshop on Policy Advice in De-democratizing and Undemocratic Contexts, 2021Konferensbidrag, Publicerat paper (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

The last decade is marked by tendencies of de-democratization and autocratization (Lührmann & Lindberg 2019), often characterized by polarization of politics and society, by undermining facts- and expertise-based policymaking, and by decreasing transparency and accountability of political and policy processes. As part of these democratic erosion processes, civil society has also been increasingly under attack, particularly if critical of the incumbent government.

Think tanks stand at the crossroads ofseveral ofthese tendencies, for several reasons. First, think tanks are members of civil society, and actors in this increasingly polarized political arena. Second, they are organizations that commonly contribute to policy processes with policy knowledge and expertise, which in de-democratizing and polarizing contexts appears to be increasingly troublesome. Third, think tanks are actors that traditionally claim independence beyond party and political lines in their activities. This position may be difficult to uphold in a context where governmental and specific party allegiance is of accelerating importance.

Our research aims to bring together scholarship on de-democratization and polarization seen from the vantage point of think tanks, in an attempt to improve our understanding of the specificities of political knowledge production in the context of democratic backsliding. The context for the paper is a research project funded by the Baltic Sea Foundation on policy advice in electoral regimes. In the project we are focusing on how think tanks as knowledge producers, providers of policy advice and advocacy are relating to the broader processes of de- democratization We propose to do this through a comparison of two extreme cases of de- democratizing countries in Europe: Poland (classified by https://www.v-dem.net/en/ as electoral democracy) and Hungary (classified as electoral autocracy), both of which were downgraded from relatively high and solid democracy prior to 2010 and 2015 respectively. 

Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi
Forskningsämne
Politik, ekonomi och samhällets organisering
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-47806 (URN)
Konferens
Workshop on Policy Advice in De-democratizing and Undemocratic Contexts Hjortviken, Gothenburg 18-19 November 2021
Tillgänglig från: 2021-12-13 Skapad: 2021-12-13 Senast uppdaterad: 2021-12-15Bibliografiskt granskad
Projekt
Anarchists in Eastern and Western Europe - a Comparative Study [A068-2011_OSS]; Södertörns högskola; Publikationer
Jämte, J., Lundstedt, M. & Wennerhag, M. (2023). When Do Radical Flanks Use Violence? Conditions for Violent Protest in Radical Left-Libertarian Activism in Sweden, 1997–2016. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-20Jämte, J., Lundstedt, M. & Wennerhag, M. (2020). From Radical Counterculture to Pragmatic Radicalism? The Collective Identity of Contemporary Radical Left-libertarian Activism in Sweden. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 14(1), 1-36Jämte, J. (2017). Radical anti-fascism in Scandinavia: Shifting frames in relation to the transformation of the far right. In: Magnus Wennerhag; Christian Fröhlich; Grzegorz Piotrowski (Ed.), Radical Left Movements in Europe: (pp. 248-267). Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeWennerhag, M., Fröhlich, C. & Piotrowski, G. (Eds.). (2017). Radical left movements in Europe. Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeWennerhag, M. (2017). Radical left movements in Europe: An introduction. In: Magnus Wennerhag; Christian Fröhlich; Grzegorz Piotrowski (Ed.), Radical Left Movements in Europe: (pp. 1-21). Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgePiotrowski, G. (2017). Troubles With the (Troubled) Past: Anarchists in Poland After 1989. In: Magnus Wennerhag; Christian Fröhlich; Grzegorz Piotrowski (Ed.), Radical left movements in Europe: (pp. 137-155). Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeSörbom, A. & Wennerhag, M. (2016). Begreppet extremism - en kritisk introduktion. ARKIV. Tidskrift för samhällsanalys (5), 15-37Piotrowski, G. (2016). Od post-anarchizmu do pop-anarchizmu. In: Skrycki Radosław and Michał Przyborowski (Ed.), Radosława Skryckiego (Ed.), Studia z dziejów anarchizmu (2): w dwusetlecie urodzin Michaiła Bakunina. Paper presented at Szczecin, May 29-31, 2014.. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoPolanska, D. V. & Piotrowski, G. (2016). Poland: Local differences and the importence of cohesion. Baltic Worlds, IX(1-2), 46-56Piotrowski, G. & Polanska, D. V. (2016). Radical Urban Movements in Poland: the case of squatting. Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica, 17(1), 53-69
Politics by Other Means: Policy Professionals in Comparative Perspective [2/2016_OSS]; Södertörns högskola; Publikationer
Mellquist, J. (2023). Do communicators take over?: Mediatization and conflicts in civil society. Politics and Policy, 51(2), 184-200Mellquist, J. & Sörbom, A. (2022). Policy professionals in civil society organizations: Organizational hypocrisy and the myth of member centrality. Sociologisk forskning, 59(4), 363-386Mellquist, J. (2022). Policy professionals in civil society organizations: Struggling for influence. (Doctoral dissertation). Huddinge: Södertörns högskolaMellquist, J. (2022). Role orientation and organizational strategy among policy professionals in civil society. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 11(1), 136-156Mellquist, J. (2022). The Game of Influence: Policy Professional Capital in Civil Society. Journal of Civil Society, 18(1), 105-123Jezierska, K. & Sörbom, A. (2021). Proximity and distance: Think tanks handling the independence paradox. Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 34(2), 395-411Garsten, C., Rothstein, B. & Svallfors, S. (2018). De policyprofessionella: en okänd politisk elit?. In: Eriksson, Bengt Erik; Holmqvist, Mikael & Sohl, Lena (Ed.), Eliter i Sverige: tvärvetenskapliga perspektiv på makt, status och klass (pp. 277-308). Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 77(2)Sörbom, A. (2018). Från snack till organiserade nätverk: Om tankesmedjors arbete för att värva andra för sina idéer. Sociologisk forskning, 55(2-3), 365-387Svallfors, S. (2018). Politics for Hire: Policy Professionals in the Age of Neoliberalization. In: Jenny Andersson; Olivier Godecho (Ed.), Destabilizing Orders – Understanding the Consequencesof Neoliberalism: Proceedings of the MaxPo Fifth-Anniversary ConferenceParis, January 12–13, 2018. Paper presented at MaxPo Fifth-Anniversary Conference, Paris, January 12–13, 2018. (pp. 35-40). Paris: Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies
Policy Advice in Electoral democracies – Think Tanks in Hungary and Poland [6/2019_OSS]; Södertörns högskola; Publikationer
Sörbom, A. & Jezierska, K. (2023). Social capital and polarization: The case of Polish think tanks. Journal of Civil Society, 19(4), 347-365Sörbom, A. & Jezierska, K. (2021). Bridging or Bonding?: Think Tanks in a Polarized Context. In: Swedish Political Science Association Annual Conference: . Paper presented at Swedish Political Science Association Annual Conference, Mittuniversitetet, 29 september - 1 october 2021. Jezierska, K. & Sörbom, A. (2021). Proximity and distance: Think tanks handling the independence paradox. Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 34(2), 395-411Jezierska, K., Krizsan, A. & Sörbom, A. (2021). Think Tanks In De-Democratizing Contexts: A Framework For Analysis. In: Workshop on Policy Advice in De-democratizing and Undemocratic Contexts: . Paper presented at Workshop on Policy Advice in De-democratizing and Undemocratic Contexts Hjortviken, Gothenburg 18-19 November 2021.
Klimatpolitik och icke-statlig diplomati: nordiska företagsfinansierade tankesmedjor [2022-00863_Formas]; Södertörns högskola
Organisationer
Identifikatorer
ORCID-id: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0001-6797-3892

Sök vidare i DiVA

Visa alla publikationer